National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 9 - Path Forward
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14014.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2007. Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14014.
×
Page 97

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

96 Akinci, Burcu, and Martin Fischer (1998). “Factors Affecting Contrac- tors’ Risk of Cost Overburden,” Journal of Management in Engi- neering, Vol. 14, No. 1, American Society of Civil Engineers. Anderson, Stuart D., and Byron C. Blaschke (2004). NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 331: Statewide Highway Letting Program Manage- ment, Transportation Research Board. http://trb.org/news/blurb_ detail.asp?id=4200. Arditi, David, Gunzin Tarim Akan, and Sam Gurdamar (1985). “Cost Overruns in Public Projects,” Project Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd. Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) Inter- national (1997). AACE International Recommended Practice No. 17R-97: Cost Estimate Classification System. Booz Allen & Hamilton, Inc., and DRI/McGraw-Hill (1995). The Transit Capital Cost Index Study, Federal Transit Administration. http://www.fta.dot.gov/printer_friendly/publications_4855.html. Bruzelius, Nils, Bert Flyvbjerg, and Werner Rothengatter (2002). “Big Decisions, Big Risk: Improving Accountability in Mega Projects,” Transport Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2. Callahan, Joel T. (1998). TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 28: Managing Transit Construction Contract Claims, Transportation Research Board. http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2433. Carr, Robert I. (1989). “Cost-Estimating Principles,” Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, Vol. 115, No. 4, ASCE. Chang, Andrew Shing-Tao (2002). “Reasons for Cost and Schedule Increases for Engineering Design Projects,” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, January. Committee for Review of the Project Management Practices Employed on the Boston Central Artery/Tunnel (“Big Dig”) Project (2003). Completing the “Big Dig”: Managing the Final Stages of Boston’s Cen- tral Artery/Tunnel Project, National Academies Press. http://www. nap.edu/catalog/10629.html. Condon, E., and F. Harman (2004). “Playing Games,” 2004 AACE Inter- national Transactions, PM.14.1-6. Cost/Schedule Controls Task force (1986). Scope Definition Control, the Construction Industry Institute, Publication 6-2, Bureau of Engi- neering Research, University of Texas at Austin. Daniels, B. (1998). “A Legacy of Conflict: Utah’s Growth and the Legacy Highway,” Hinckly Journal of Politics, University of Utah, Autumn. Flyvbjerg, B., M. S. Holm, and S. Buhl (2002). “Understanding Costs in Public Works Projects: Error of Lie?” Journal of the American Plan- ning Association, Vol. 68, No. 3. Hall, Peter (1980). Great Planning Disasters, University of California Press. Harbuck, R. H. (2004). “Competitive Bidding for Highway Construc- tion Projects,” 2004 AACE International Transactions, EST.09.1-4. Hudachko, T. (2004). Legacy Parkway SEIS Moving Forward, Shared Solutions, Utah Transit Authority and Utah Department of Transportation. Hufschmidt, Maynard M., and Jacques Gerin (1970). “Systematic Errors in Cost Estimates for Public Investment Projects,” The Analysis of Public Output, J. Margolis (ed.), Columbia University Press. Mackie, Peter, and John Preston (1998). Twenty-One Sources of Error and Bias in Transportation Project Appraisal, Transport Policy, Vol. 5, No. 1, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, United Kingdom, 1–7. Maryland DOT (March 1, 2002). “Summary of Independent Review Committee Findings Regarding the Woodrow Wilson Bridge Super- structure Contract.” Massachusetts Highway Department (MassHighway) and the American Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC) (1998). Measuring Design Quality. Merrow, Edward W. (1986). A Quantitative Assessment of R&D Require- ments for Solids Processing Technology Process Plants, Rand Corpo- ration. http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3216. Merrow, Edward W. (1988). Understanding the Outcomes of Mega- Projects: A Quantitative Analysis of Very Large Civilian Projects, Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3560. Merrow, Edward W., Kenneth K. Phillips, and Christopher W. Myers (1981). Understanding Cost Growth and Performance Shortfalls in Pioneer Process Plants, Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/ reports/R2569. Neuman, Timothy R., Marcy Schwartz, Leofwin Clark, and James Bednar (2002). NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for Achiev- ing Context Sensitive Solutions, Transportation Research Board. http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=1373. New Jersey DOT (1999). Modified Design/Build Program: Progress Report #6. Noor, I., and R. I. Tichacek (2004). “Contingency Misuse and Other Risk Management Pitfalls,” 2004 AACE International Transactions, RICK.04.1-7. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. (2002). Final Draft: Design- Build Practice Report, New York State Department of Transporta- tion. http://www.dot.state.ny.us/design/designbuild/dbprarep.pdf. Pearl, R. (2004). “The Effect of Market Conditions on Tendering and Forecasting,” AACE Transactions, Association for the Advance- ment of Cost Engineering International. References

97 Pickrell, Don H. (1990). Urban Rail Transit Projects: Forecast Versus Actual Ridership and Costs, report DOT-T-91-04, U.S. Department of Transportation. Pickrell, Don H. (1992). “A Desire Named Streetcar: Fantasy and Facts in Rail Transit Promotions and Evaluation,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 58, No. 2. Ripley, P. W. (2004). “Contingency! Who Owns and Manages It!” 2004 AACE International Transactions, CSC.08.1-4. SAIC (2002). 2002 Survey by SAIC for Illinois DOT on the Current Use of Design-Build, Federal Highway Administration, www.fhwa.dot. gov/programadmin/contracts/survey02.cfm. Sawyer, John E. (1951–1952). “Entrepreneurial Error and Economic Growth,” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 199–204, 1951–52. Schexnayder, Cliff J., Sandra L. Weber, and Christine Fiori (2003). Proj- ect Cost Estimating: A Synthesis of Highway Practice. Report for NCHRP Project 20-07/Task 152. http://cms.transportation.org/ sites/design/docs/Project%20Cost%20Estimating%20Report.pdf. Schroeder, D. V. (2000). “Comments on Legacy Highway Final Environ- mental Impact Statement,” Sierra Club. http://utah.sierraclub.org/ ogden/legacycom.html. Semple, Cheryl, Francis T. Hartman, and George Jergeas (1994). “Con- struction Claims and Disputes: Causes and Cost/Time Over- runs.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 4. State of Alaska (1994). Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Highway Design Cost and Quality Comparison, Division of Legislative Audit. www.legaudit.state.ak.us/pages/audits/1995/pdf/4472.pdf. Tilley, P. A., A. Wyatt, and S. Mohamed (1997). “Indicators of Design and Documentation Deficiency,” Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construc- tion, 16–17 July, Australia, 137–148. Touran, Ali, and Paul J. Bolster (1994). Risk Assessment in Fixed Guide- way Transit System Construction, Federal Transit Administration. U.S. General Accounting Office (1997). Transportation Infrastructure: Managing the Costs of Large-Dollar Highway Projects, report GAO/ RCED-97-47. http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/5000/5900/5978/rc97047.pdf. U.S. General Accounting Office (1999). Transportation Infrastructure: Impacts of Utility Relocations on Highway and Bridge Projects, report GAO/RCED-99-131. U.S. General Accounting Office (1999a). Mass Transit: Status of New Starts Transit Projects with Full Funding Grant Agreements, report GAO/RCED-99-240. www.gao.gov/archive/1999/rc99240.pdf. U.S. General Accounting Office (2002). Transportation Infrastructure Cost and Oversight Issues on Major Highway and Bridge Projects, report GAO-02-702T. www.gao.gov/new.items/d02702t.pdf. U.S. General Accounting Office (2003). Federal-Aid Highways: Cost and Oversight of Major Highway and Bridge Projects—Issues and Options, report GAO-03-764T. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03764t.pdf. Utah Department of Transportation (2004). “Legacy Parkway Project History.” www.udot.utah.gov/index.php/m=c/tid=1056. Weiss, Lawrence L. (2000). “Design/Build—Lessons Learned to Date (Design/Build Initial Report),” South Dakota Department of Transportation. Werkmeister, Raymond F., Jr., and Donn E. Hancher (2001). “Paris- Lexington Road Project: Project Report,” Transportation Research Record 1761: Construction 2001, Transportation Research Board. Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project (February 29, 2002). Bridge Super- structure Contract (BR-3): Review of the Engineer’s Estimate vs. the Single Bid.

Next: Appendix A - Tools »
Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction Get This Book
×
 Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 574: Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction explores approaches to cost estimation and management designed to overcome the root causes of cost escalation and to support the development of consistent and accurate project estimates through all phases of the development process, from long-range planning, through priority programming, and through project design.

NCHRP Web-Only Document 98 details the steps followed by the research team in the development of NCHRP Report 574.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!