Ruggedness Testing of the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number Tests with the Simple Performance Tester (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

39 1. Witczak, M.W., Kaloush, K.E., Pellinen, T.K., El-Basyouny, M., and Von Quintus, H., NCHRP Report 465: Simple Performance Test for Superpave Mix Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. 2. ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division Guide for Mechanistic- Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Final Report Prepared for the National Cooperative Highway Re- search Program, March 2004. 3. Dougan, C., Stephens, J., Mahoney, J., and Hansen, G., “E∗- Dynamic Modulus Test Protocol – Problems and Solutions,” Report Number: CT-SPR-0003084-F03-3, Connecticut DOT and Federal Highway Administration, 2003. 4. Pellinen, T. K., “Investigation of the Use of Dynamic Modulus as an Indicator of Hot-Mix Asphalt Performance,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, 2001. 5. Witczak, M.W., Bonaquist, R., Von Quintus, H., and Kaloush, K.E., “Specimen Geometry and Aggregate Size Effects in Uniaxial Com- pression and Constant Height Shear Tests, Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 69, 2000, pp. 733–793. 6. Christensen, D.W., Pellinen, T.K., and Bonaquist, R.F., “Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 72, 2003. 7. Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC, “NCHRP Project 9-33 Mix Design Manual for Hot-Mix Asphalt, Unpublished First Draft,” Sterling, VA, June 2007. 8. Federal Highway Administration, “LTPPBind Version 2.1 (Software), FHWA, McLean, VA, July 1999. 9. Kaloush, K.E., “Simple Performance Test for Permanent Defor- mation of Asphalt Mixtures,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, 2001. 10. Witczak, M.W., “Superpave Support and Performance Models Man- agement,” NCHRP Project 9-19, Original Study Tasks C, F, and G, Unpublished Quarterly Report, July-September 2002. 11. Bonaquist, R.F., Christensen, D.W., and Stump, W., NCHRP Report 513: Simple Performance Tester for Superpave Mix Design: First Article Development and Evaluation, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. 12. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Prop- erties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), AASHTO Designation: T315-06,” AASHTO Standard Specifica- tion for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, Part 2B: Tests, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 26th Edition, 2006. 13. Ott, L., An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA, 1977. 14. Biligiri, K., Kaloush, K.E., Mamlouk, M.S., and Witczak, M.W., “Rational Modeling of Tertiary Flow for Asphalt Mixtures,” Trans- portation Research Record 2001, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 63–72. References