National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 4 - Conclusions and Suggested Research
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14249.
×
Page 36
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14249.
×
Page 37

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

36 ABAQUS/CAE User’s Manual, version 6.7. Dassault Systemes, Providence, RI, 2007. ACPA. Understanding Sawed Joints and Dowel Bar Alignment. Concrete Pavement Progress, Vol. 40, No. 4. American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, September 2004. AASHTO. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice. Interim Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, July 2008. Burnham, T. A Field Study of PCC Joint Misalignment near Fergus Falls, Minnesota, Report No. MN/RC-1999-29. Minnesota DOT, Maplewood, MN, 1999. Buch, N., L. Khazanovich, and A. Gotlif. Evaluation of Alignment Tolerances for Dowel Bars and their Effects on Joint Performance. Pavement Research Center of Excellence, 2001. Crovetti, J.A. Evaluation of Jointed Concrete Pavement Systems Incorpo- rating Open-Graded Permeable Bases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1994. Davids, B. EVERFE Theory Manual. http://www.civil.umaine.edu/EverFE, 2003. Fowler, G., and W. Gulden. Investigation of Location of Dowel Bars Placed by Mechanical Implantation, Georgia Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA/RD-82/153. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1983. FHWA. Technical Advisory 5040.30, Concrete Pavement Joints. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1990. FHWA. Use of Magnetic Tomography to Evaluate Dowel Bar Placement. TechBrief. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2005. FHWA. Best Practices for Dowel Placement Tolerances. TechBrief. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2007. Guo, H., J.A. Sherwood, and M.B. Snyder. Component Dowel-Bar Model for Load-Transfer Systems in PCC Pavements. Journal of Transporta- tion Engineering, Vol. 121, 1996, pp. 289–298. Hoerner, T.E., M.I. Darter, L. Khazanovich, L. Titus-Glover, and K.L. Smith. Improved Prediction Models for PCC Pavement Performance- Related Specifications, Volume I: Final Report, Report No. FHWA- RD-00-130. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, 2000. Hossain, S., and M.K. Elfino. Field Demonstration of Magnetic Tomog- raphy Technology for Determination of Dowel Bar Position in Concrete Pavement, VTRC 06-R40. Virginia Transportation Research Council, June 2006. Khazanovich, L., and A. Gotlif. Evaluation of Joint and Crack Load Transfer, Report No. FHWA-RD-02-088. Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, DC, 2002. Khazanovich, L., M. Darter, and R. Bartlett. Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing PCC Pavements, Report No. FHWA- RD-97-131. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1998. Khazanovich, L., M. Darter, and T. Yu. Mechanistic-Empirical Model to Predict Transverse Joint Faulting. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1896. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, DC, 2004, pp. 34–45. Khazanovich, L., H.T. Yu, S. Rao, K. Galasova, E. Shats, and R. Jones. ISLAB2000—Finite Element Analysis Program for Rigid and Com- posite Pavements, User’s Guide. ERES Consultants, Champaign, IL, 2000. Khazanovich, L., N. Buch, and A. Gotlif. “Mechanistic Evaluation of Vertical Misalignment of Dowel Bars and their Effect on Joint Performance,” Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Con- crete Pavement. Lake Buena Vista, FL, 2001, pp. 525–538. Khazanovich, L., H.T. Yu, and R. Stubstad. Nondestructive Dowel Bar Detection in Existing Rigid Concrete Pavement Slabs. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003. Khazanovich, L., I. Yut, D. Tompkins, and A. Schultz. The Second Gen- eration of Minnesota Accelerated Loading Facility—Minne-ALF-2. Proceedings, 8th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. Colorado Springs, CO, 2005. Lechner, B. Joint Design and Joint Performance of Plain Concrete Pavements (JPCP)—Investigations and Experiences in Germany. Proceedings, 8th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. Colorado Springs, CO, 2005. Leong, P. Analysis of Effect of Dowel Bar Misalignment on the Performance of Concrete Pavement Joints. Thesis for the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2006. McGhee, K.H. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 211: Design, Construction, and Maintenance of PCC Pavement Joints. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1995. Midwest Concrete Consortium (MCC) State Representative Reports. Madison, WI, April 2004. Miller, J. S., and W. Y. Bellinger. Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program (Fourth Revised Edition), Report No. FHWA-RD-03-031. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2003. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. Construction Specification for Concrete Pavement and Concrete Base, O.P.S.S. 350, 2007. References

37 NCHRP. Synthesis Report of Highway Practice 56: Joint-Related Distress in PCC Pavement: Cause, Prevention, and Rehabilitation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1979. Odden, T.R., M.B. Snyder, and A.E. Schultz. Performance Testing of Experimental Dowel Bar Retrofit Designs: Part 1 – Initial Testing, Final Report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, 2003. Owusu-Antwi, E.B., L. Titus-Glover, L. Khazanovich, and J.R. Roesler. Development and Calibration of Mechanistic-Empirical Distress Models for Cost Allocation, Final Report. Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, DC, 1997. PCA. Concrete Paving – 100 Years of Progress Through Innovation. Concrete in Highway Transportation, No. 10, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 1991. Prabhu, M., N. Buch, A.H. Varma, and D. Thandaveswara. Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Dowel Misalignment on Joint Opening Behavior in Rigid Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1947, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2006, pp. 15–27. Tayabji, S.D. Dowel Placement Tolerances for Concrete Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1062, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1986, pp. 47–54. Tayabji, S.D., and P.A. Okamoto. Field Evaluation of Dowel Placement in Concrete Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 110, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1987, pp. 101–109. Yu, H.T. Dowel Bar Alignments of Typical In-Service Pavements, R&D Serial No. 2894. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2005. Yu, H.T., K.D. Smith, M.I. Darter, J. Jiang, and L. Khazanovich. Per- formance of Concrete Pavements, Volume III: Improving Concrete Pavement Performance, Report No. FHWA-RD-95-111. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1998.

Next: Attachment A - Recommended Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements »
Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements Get This Book
×
 Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 637: Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements examines the effects of dowel misalignment on concrete pavement performance, and highlights measures for reducing misalignment and its adverse effect.

Appendixes A through D to NCHRP Report 637 are available online and provide detailed information on the literature review, laboratory and field test results, and finite element analysis.

Appendix A: Review of Literature and Other Relevant Information

Appendix B: Field Testing Results

Appendix C: Laboratory Testing Results

Appendix D: Finite Element Analysis

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!