National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Section 11 - Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research
Page 146
Suggested Citation:"Section 12 - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14323.
×
Page 146
Page 147
Suggested Citation:"Section 12 - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14323.
×
Page 147
Page 148
Suggested Citation:"Section 12 - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14323.
×
Page 148
Page 149
Suggested Citation:"Section 12 - References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14323.
×
Page 149

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

147 S E C T I O N 1 2 1. Griffith, M. S., Safety Evaluation of Rolled-in Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways, In Transportation Research Record, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. 2. Patel, R. B., F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith, Estimating the Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota: An Empirical Bayes Observational Before-After Study, Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2007. 3. Carrasco, O., J. McFadden, P. Chandhok, and R. Patel, Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Rural Multi- lane Divided Highways in Minnesota, Presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C., January 2004. 4. Persaud, B. N., R. A. Retting, and C. A. Lyon, Crash Reduction Following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two- lane Roads. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA, September 2003. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/safety/ rumble/IIHS_report.pdf. Accessed November 2005. 5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Traffic Safety Facts 2005: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates Sys- tem, Report HS-808 707. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. 6. Neuman, T. R., R. Pfefer, K. L. Slack, K. K. Hardy, F. Council, H. McGee, L. Prothe, and K. Eccles, NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 6: A Guide for Addressing Run-Off-Road Collisions, Trans- portation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2003. 7. Neuman, T. R., R. Pfefer, K. L. Slack, K. K. Hardy, H. McGee, L. Prothe, K. Eccles, and F. Council, NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 4: A Guide for Addressing Head-On Collisions, Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. 8. Alexander, H. B., and P. A. Pisano, “An Investigation of Passing Accidents on Two-Lane, Two-Way Roads,” Public Roads, Vol- ume 56, Issue 1, 1992. 9. Mohamedsha, Y. M., “Investigation of Passing Accidents Using the HSIS Data Base,” Public Roads, Volume 56, Issue 2, 1992. 10. National Sleep Foundation, 2002 Sleep in America Poll, Washington, D.C., 2002. 11. Beirness, D. J., H. M. Simpson, and K. Desmond, The Road Safety Monitor 2004. Drowsy Driving, Traffic Injury Research Founda- tion (TIRF), Ottawa, Ontario, 2005. 12. Vanlaar, W., H. Simpson, D. Mayhew, and R. Robertson, Fatigued and Drowsy Driving: Attitudes, Concern, and Practices of Ontario Drivers, Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF), Ottawa, Ontario, 2007. 13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Drowsy Driving and Automobile Crashes, Report HS-810 631. U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1998. 14. Bucko, T. R., and A. Khorashadi, Evaluation of Milled-In Rumble Strips, Rolled-In Rumble Strips and Audible Edge Stripe, Office of Transportation Safety and Research, California Department of Transportation, April 2001. 15. Harwood, D. W., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 191: Use of Rumble Strips to Enhance Safety, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993. 16. Ligon, C. M., E. C. Carter, D. B. Joost, and W. F. Wolman, Effects of Shoulder Textured Treatments on Safety, Report No. FHWA/RD-85/ 027, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1985. 17. Chaudoin, J. H., and G. Nelson, Interstate Routes 15 and 40 Shoul- der Rumble Strips, Report Caltrans-08-85-1. California Department of Transportation, August 1985. 18. Annino, J. M., Rumble Strips In Connecticut: A Before/After Analy- sis of Safety Benefits, Connecticut Department of Transportation, 2003. 19. Stutts, J. C., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 287: Sleep Deprivation Countermeasures for Motorists Safety, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 20. Gårder, P., and J. Alexander, Continued Research on Continuous Rumble Strips. Final Report, Technical Report 94-4. Maine Depart- ment of Transportation, December 1995. 21. Morena, D. A., The Nature and Severity of Drift-Off Road Crashes On Michigan Freeways, and the Effectiveness of Various Shoulder Rumble Strip Designs. Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. 22. Marvin, R. R., and D. J. Clark, An Evaluation of Shoulder Rumble Strips In Montana, Montana Department of Transportation, 2003. 23. Perrillo, K., The Effectiveness and Use of Continuous Shoulder Rum- ble Strips, Federal Highway Administration, Albany, NY, 1998. 24. Hickey, J. J., Jr., “Shoulder Rumble Strip Effectiveness, Drift-Off- Road Accident Reductions on the Pennsylvania Turnpike.” In Transportation Research Record 1573. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 105–109. 25. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Statewide Installation of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Tennessee’s Interstates. http://www.tdot. state.tn.us/rumble/release.htm. Accessed September 2005. References

26. Cheng, E. Y. C., E. Gonzalez, and M. O. Christensen, Application and Evaluation of Rumble Strips on Highways, Utah Department of Transportation, Compendium of Technical Papers, 64th ITE Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, 1994. 27. Chen, C., E. O. Darko, and T. N. Richardson, Optimal Continu- ous Shoulder Rumble Strips and the Effects on Highway Safety and the Economy, ITE Journal, Vol. 73, No. 5, May 2003. 28. Harkey, D. L., R. Srinivasan, J. Baek, F. M. Council, K. Eccles, N. Lefler, F. Gross, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, E. Hauer, and J. Bonneson, NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engi- neering and ITS Improvements, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008. 29. Fitzpatrick, K., K. Balke, D. W. Harwood, and I. B. Anderson, NCHRP Report 440: Accident Mitigation Guide for Congested Rural Two-Lane Highways, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 30. Outcalt, W., Centerline Rumble Strips, Report No. CDOT-DTD- R-2001-8. Colorado Department of Transportation, August 2001. 31. Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT). CRS: The Delaware Experience. http://www.deldot.net/static/projects/ rumblestrip/handout.pdf. Accessed November 2005. 32. Noyce, D. A., and V. V. Elango, Safety Evaluation of Centerline Rumble Strips: A Crash and Driver Behavior Analysis, In Trans- portation Research Record, No. 1862, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. 33. Briese, M., Safety Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips in Minnesota, Capstone Project for Infrastructure Systems Engineering Program, University of Minnesota, December 2006. 34. Missouri Department of Transportation, unpublished results provided to the research team. 35. Nebraska Department of Roads, unpublished results provided to the research team. 36. Russell, E. R., and M. J. Rys, NCHRP Synthesis 339: Centerline Rum- ble Strips. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005. 37. Porter, R. J., E. T. Donnell, and K. M. Mahoney, Evaluation of Centerline Rumble Strips Effects on Lateral Placement and Speed. In Transportation Research Record, No. 1862, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. 38. Miles, J. D., P. J. Carlson, M. P. Pratt, and T. D. Thompson, Traf- fic Operational Impacts of Transverse, Centerline, and Edgeline Rumble Strips, Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4472-2. Texas Department of Transportation, March 2005. 39. Räsänen, M., Effects of a Rumble Strip Barrier Line on Lane Keep- ing in a Curve, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 3, May 2005. 40. Touvinen, P., and A. Enberg, Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Finland, Presented at the 5th Inter- national Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Ser- vice, Yokohama, Japan, 2006. 41. Harder, K., J. Carmody, and J. Bloomfield. The Effect of Centerline Treatments on Driving Performance, Report No. MN/RC-2002-35. Minnesota Department of Transportation, March 2002. 42. Hirasawa, M., K. Saito, and M. Asano, Study on Development and Practical Use of Rumble Strips as a New Measure for Highway Safety, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp 3697–3712, 2005. http://www.easts.info/on-line/ journal_06/3697.pdf. 43. Gardner, L. W., M. J. Rys, and E. Russell, Comparison of Football Shaped Rumble Strips versus Rectangular Rumble Strips, Final Report K-Tran: KSU 5-34050. Kansas Department of Transporta- tion, May 2006. 44. Outcalt, W., Bicycle-Friendly Rumble Strips., Report No. CDOT- DTD-R-2001-4. Colorado Department of Transportation. May 2001. 45. Elefteriadou, L., M. El-Gindy, D. Torbic, P. Garvey, A. Homan, Z. Jiang, B. Pecheux, and R. Tallon, Bicycle-Tolerable Shoulder Rum- ble Strip, Report Number: PTI 2K15. The Pennsylvania State Uni- versity, The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, March 2000. 46. Russell, E. R., M. J. Rys, and T. S. Brin, U.S. Experience with Centerline Rumbles Strips on Two-lane Roads: Pattern Research and North American Usage. Mid-continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, IA, 2003. http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/pubs/ midcon2003/RussellRumble.pdf. 47. Brin, T. S., Reducing Crossover Accidents on Kansas Highways Using Milled Centerline Rumble Strips, M.S. thesis, Kansas State University, 2001. 48. Chen, C. S., A Study of Effectiveness of Various Rumble Strips on Highway Safety, Traffic Engineering Division, Virginia Department of Transportation, November 1994. 49. Tye, E. J., Devices to Prevent Run-Off-Road Accidents, Report No. CA-DOT-TR-1269-1-76-01. California Department of Transportation, Office of Traffic, February 1976. 50. O’Hanlon, J. F., and G. R. Kelley, A Psychophysiological Evaluation of Devices for Preventing Lane Drift and Run-Off-Road Accidents, California Department of Transportation, September 1974. 51. Wikipedia, A-Weighting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-weighting. Accessed April 2008. 52. Okanagan Audio Lab. http://www.okaudiolab.com/faqs.htm. Accessed April 2008. 53. Miller, K. W., Effects of Center-Line Rumble Strips on Non- Conventional Vehicles, Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2008. 54. Torbic, D. J., Comfort and Controllability of Bicycles as a Function of Rumble Strip Design, Ph.D. thesis in Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, August 2001. 55. International Organization of Standardization, Mechanical Vibra- tion and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements, ISO 2631, International Organization of Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. 56. Bahar, G. J., and M. Parkhill, Synthesis of Practices for the Imple- mentation of Centerline Rumble Strips, Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), July 2005. 57. Bahar, G., J. Wales, and L. Longtin-Nobel, Synthesis of Best Prac- tices for the Implementation of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips, Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), 2001. 58. Turochy, R. E., Shoulder Rumble Strips: Evolution, Current Practice, and Research Needs. Presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2004. 59. Elefteriadou, L., D. Torbic, M. El-Gindy, S. Stoffels, and M. Adolini, Rumble Strips for Lower Volume Roads with Narrow or Non-Existent Shoulders, Report Number: PTI 2002-11. The Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, October 2001. 60. Isackson, C., Continuous Milled Shoulder Rumble Strips, Nationwide Survey, Minnesota Department of Transportation, February 2000. 61. Federal Highway Administration, Survey Summary Results–Use of Shoulder Treatments to Reduce Run Off Road Crashes, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, 1998. 62. Morgan, R. L., and D. E. McAuliffe, Effectiveness of Shoulder Rumble Strips: A Survey of Current Practice, Report FHWA/NY/ 148

SR-97/127, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Special Report 127, Transportation Research and Development Bureau, New York State Department of Transportation, September 1997. 63. Federal Highway Administration, Synthesis of Shoulder Rumble Strip Practices and Policies, Executive Summary, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/ research/exec_summary.htm. Accessed November 2005. 64. ———. Technical Advisory: Roadway Shoulder Rumble Strips, U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2001. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/techadvs/t504035.htm. 65. Bahar, G. J., M. P. Parkhill, E. Tan, C. Philp, N. Morris, S. Naylor, T. White, E. Hauer, F. M. Council, B. Persaud, C. Zegeer, R. Elvik, A. Smiley, and B. Scott, NCHRP Project 17-27: “Development of Parts I and II of a Highway Safety Manual, Inclusion Process and Literature Review Procedure for Part II,” June 2007. 66. Zegeer, C. V., R. Stewart, F. Council, and T. R. Neuman, “Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads.” In Trans- portation Research Record 1195, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988. 67. Harwood, D. W., F. M. Council, E. Hauer, W. E. Hughes, and A. Vogt. Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways, FHWA-RD-99-207, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000. 68. SafetyAnalyst: Software Tools for Safety Management of Specific Highway Sites, www.safetyanalyst.org. 69. Harwood, D. W., K. M. Bauer, K. R. Richard, and D. J. Torbic, Overview of SafetyAnalyst Capabilities for Module 4–Countermeasure Evaluation Using SafetyAnalyst, 2009. 70. Hauer, E. Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety. Perg- amon Press, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, England, 1997. 71. Hauer, E., D. W. Harwood, F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith, Esti- mating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial. In Transportation Research Record, No. 1784, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002. 72. Lord, D., and B. N. Persaud, Accident Prediction Models with and without Trend: Application of the Generalized Estimating Equa- tion Procedure. In Transportation Research Record, No. 1717, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 73. Stokes, M. E., C. S. Davis, and G. G. Koch. Categorical Data Analy- sis using the SAS® System, Second Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC: 2000. 74. SAS Institute Inc., SAS/Stat® 9.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC, 2004. 75. Chen, C. S., and B. H. Cottrell, Jr., Guidelines for Using Centerline Rumble Strips in Virginia, Report No. VTRC 05-R30. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Virginia Department of Trans- portation, June 2005. 76. Watts, G. R. The Development of Rumble Areas as a Driver-alerting Device, Supplementary Report 291. Transportation and Road Research Laboratory, 1977. 77. Anund, A., M. Hjälmdahl, H. Sehammar, G. Palmqvist, and B. Thorslund, Placement and Design of Milled Rumble Strips on Centre Line and Shoulder, VTI Report 523A, Swedish Road Administration, 2005. 78. Stanley, L. M., Haptic and Auditory Interfaces as a Collision Avoid- ance Technique during Roadway Departures and Driver Perception of These Modalities, Federal Highway Administration, Research, and Innovative Technology Administration Report. Western Transportation Institute, College of Engineering, Montana State University, 2006. 79. Nave, R. Hyperphysics: Sound and hearing, 2005. http://hyper physics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/sound/db.html. 80. Sanfilipo, M., Human hearing: Amplitude sensitivity Part 1, 2005. http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/roomacoustics/Human HearingAmplitude.php. 81. Higgins, J. S., and W. Barbel, Rumble Strip Noise. In Transportation Research Record 983, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984. 82. Backus, J. The Acoustical Foundations of Music, 2nd Ed, WW Norton, New York, 1977 in Nave, R. (2005). Hyperphysics: Sound and hearing. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/ sound/db.html. 83. Myer, E., and S. Walton, Preformed rumble strips, Midwest Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative Pooled Fund Study, 2002. http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/smartwz/reports/MwSWZDI-2002- Meyer-Preformed_Rumble_Strips.pdf#search=′perception%20 rumble%20strips. 84. Spring, G. S., Shoulder rumble strips in Missouri, RDT 03-007. Missouri Department of Transportation, 2003. 85. Masayuki, H., T. Tetsuya, A. Motoki, and S. Kazuo, Developing Optimal Centerline Rumble Strips and Evaluating Their Safety Benefits on National Highways in Hokkaido, Japan. Presented at the 85th Annual Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2006. 86. Lipscomb, D. M., Auditory Perceptual Factors Influencing the Ability of Train Horns, Third International Symposium on Railroad- Highway Grade Crossing Research and Safety, 1995. 87. Green, P., W. Levison, G. Paelke, and C. Serafin, Suggested Human Factors Design Guidelines for Driver Information Systems, Technical Report UMTRI-93-21, FHWA-RD-94-087. 1994. 88. Berson, B. L. (Letter to the editor), Human Factors Society Bulletin, 33(1), p. 12,: The Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, January 1990, pp. 120. 89. Boff, K. R., and J. E. Lincoln, Engineering Data Compendium: Human Perception and Performance, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH. U.S. Air Force, Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1988, pp. 2388–2389. 90. Boucek, G. P., Jr., J. E. Veitengrubber, and W. D. Smith, Aircraft Alerting Systems Criteria Study. Volume II, Human Factors Guidelines for Aircraft Alerting Systems, FAA-RD-76-222-2. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., May 1977. 91. Patterson, R. D., Guidelines for Auditory Warning Systems in Civil Aircraft, CAA paper 82017. London, UK, Civil Aviation Authority, 1982. 92. Doll, T. J., and D. J. Folds, Auditory Signals in Military Aircraft: Ergonomics Principles versus Practice, Applied Ergonomics, 17, 1986, pp. 257–264. 93. Zineddin, A. Z., P. M. Garvey, D. J. Torbic, and L. Elefteriadou, Development and Testing of Shoulder Rumble Strips Using Bi- cyclists’ Perspectives. Presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. 94. Bajdek, C. J., J. C. Ross, and L. H. Chan, A Case Study on the Effects of Rumble Strip Noise in a Community, Paper No. 03-3817 (CD-ROM), Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2003. 95. Potter, R. C., S. A. Fidell, M. M. Myles, and D. N. Keast, Effective- ness of Audible Warning Devices on Emergency Vehicles, Report DOT-TSC-OST-77-38, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1977. 96. Mak, K. K., and D. L. Sicking, NCHRP Report 492: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP)—Engineer’s Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. 149

97. Khan, A. M., and A. Bacchus, Economic Feasibility and Related Issues of Highway Shoulder Rumble Strips. In Transportation Research Record 1498, TRB, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1995. 98. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- cials (AASHTO), Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, Washington, D.C., 1999. 99. Moeur, R. C., Rumble Strip Gap Study. Final Report, Arizona Department of Transportation, May 1999. http://safety.fhwa.dot. gov/roadway_dept/docs/gapstudy.pdf. 100. Smith, E. B., Evaluation of Safety Benefits and Potential Crash Migration Due to Shoulder Rumble Strip Installation on Connecti- cut Freeways, Masters thesis, University of Connecticut, 2004. 101. Kirk, A., Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Pavement Rumble Strips, Research Report KTC-08-04/SPR319-06-1F. Kentucky Trans- portation Center, University of Kentucky, College of Engineering, January 2008. 102. Gårder, P., and J. Alexander, Shoulder Rumble Strips for Improving Safety on Rural Interstates Year One. Final Report, Technical Paper 94-4. Maine Department of Transportation, December 1994. 103. Nambisan, S. S., M. R. Dangeti, V. K. Vanapalli, and A. K. Singh, “Effectiveness of Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips in Reducing Single-Vehicle Ran-Off-Roadway Crashes in Nevada,” Proceedings of the 2007 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, Iowa, August 2007. 104. Wood, N. E., Shoulder Rumble Strips: A Method to Alert “Drifting” Drivers, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, January 1994. 105. Miles, J. D., M. P. Pratt, and P. J. Carlson, Evaluation of Erratic Maneuvers Associated with Installation of Rumble Strips. In Transportation Research Record 1973, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp 73–79. 106. Finley, M. D., and J. D. Miles, Exterior Noise Created by Vehicles Traveling over Rumble Strips, Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., January 2007. 107. Miles, J. D., and M. D. Finley, Evaluation of Factors that Impact the Effectiveness of Rumble Strip Design, Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton D.C., January 2007. 108. Franke, K. A., Evaluation of Rumble Strips, Virginia Highway & Transportation Research Council, November 1974. 109. Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), Painted Rumble Strips on Michigan Freeways: Driver and Community Perceptions, Survey conducted by Public Sector Consultants Inc., May 2006. 110. Young, T., Bicycle Use on Highways with Rumble Strips, Test Report U.S. 191/Hoback Canyon, Teton County, Wyoming, 1997. 111. Gårder, P., Rumble Strips or Not Along Wide Shoulders Designated for Bicycle Traffic? In Transportation Research Record No. 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995. 112. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- cials (AASHTO), Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, Washington, D.C., July 2004. 113. DiGiovine, C. P., Analysis of Whole-Body Vibration during Man- ual Wheelchair Propulsion: A Comparison of Seat Cushions and Back Supports. 2001. http://www.wheelchairnet.org/WCN_WCU/ SlideLectures/2001resna/digio_vib2.html. 114. VanSickle, D. P., R. A. Cooper, M. L. Boninger, and C. P. DiGiovine, Analysis of Vibrations Induced during Wheelchair Propulsion, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 38, No. 4, July/August 2001. http://www.vard.org/jour/ 01/38/4/vansi384.html. 115. Federal Highway Administration, Rumble Strip Website. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/pavement/rumble_strips. Accessed December 2005. 116. Lemire, R., Preparation of Rumble Strips Prior to Overlayment– Research Project No. 13733V. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, July 2005. 117. Boisvert, D., and R. Lemire, Preparation of Rumble Strips Prior to Overlayment–Research Project No. 13733V: Test Site Inspection— July 21, 2005. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, July 2005. 118. Boisvert, D., Preparation of Rumble Strips Prior to Overlayment— Research Project No. 13733V: Test Site Inspection—April 27, 2006. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, April 2006. 119. Boisvert, D., Preparation of Rumble Strips Prior to Overlayment— Research Project No. 13733V: Test Site Inspection—June 8, 2007. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, June 2007. 120. Gupta, J., Development of Criteria for Design, Placement and Spac- ing of Rumble Strips, Report FHWA/OH-93/022. Ohio Department of Transportation, 1993. 121. Filcek, M. J., V. Oulevski, J. G. Morena, D. C. Long, and T. L. Maleck, Development of a Profiled Pavement Marking System. Investigation of the Dry/Wet-Night Retroreflectivity and Durability of Pavement Markings Placed in Milled Rumble Strips. Presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2004. 122. North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT), Evalua- tion of “Rumble Stripes,” Report MR 2004-3. Materials and Research Division, Bismarck, North Dakota, 2004. 123. Pike, A. M., P. J. Carlson, and H. G. Hawkins, Jr., Evaluation of the Visibility of Pavement Markings in Wet-Night Rainy Conditions and the Appropriateness of Associated Measurement Techniques, Pre- sented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2007. 124. Lindly, J. K., and A. Narci, Evaluation of Rumble Stripe Markings, Final Report, Alabama DOT Project No. 930-506R. November 2006. 125. Fechner, G. T., Elements of Psychophysics (Sections VII and XVI), Trans. H. S. Langfeld, 1912. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Fechner/. 150

Next: Acronyms »
Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips Get This Book
×
 Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips explores the design and application of shoulder and centerline rumble strips as a crash reduction measure, while minimizing adverse effects for motorcyclists, bicyclists, and nearby residents.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!