Geometric Design Practices for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

33 REFERENCES 1. Special Report 214: Designing Safer Roads: Practices for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987. 2. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of High- ways and Streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004. 3. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT ≤ 400), AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001. 4. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Geometric Design Guide for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation (RRR) of Highways and Streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1977. 5. RRR Alternative Evaluations for Non-Interstate Rural Arterial and Collector Systems, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1980. 6. Design Standards for Highways: Resurfacing, Restora- tion, and Rehabilitation of Streets and Highways Other Than Freeways, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., June 1982. 7. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of High- ways and Streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004. 8. Geometric Design Criteria and Processes for Nonfree- way RRR Projects, Technical Advisory T 5040.21, Fed- eral Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Oct. 17, 1988. 9. Developing Geometric Design Criteria for Nonfreeway RRR Projects, Technical Advisory T 5040.28, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Apr. 4, 1983. 10. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Roadside Design Guide, AASHTO, Wash- ington, D.C., 2005. 11. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Volumes 1 through 19, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., (various dates). [Online]. Available: safety.transportation.org/guides.aspx. 12. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials. Highway Safety Manual, AASHTO, Wash- ington, D.C., 2010 [Online]. Available: www.highwaysafetymanual.org. 13. Mahoney, K.M., F. Julian, and H.W. Taylor, Jr., Good Practices: Incorporating Safety into Resurfacing and Restoration Projects, Report No. FHWA-SA-07-001, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2006. 14. Donnell, E., Speed Concepts: Informational Guide, Report FHWA-SA-10-001, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2009 [Online]. Avail- able: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmtg/ref_mats/ fhwasa10001/. 15. Gross, F., P. Jovanis, and K. Eccles, Safety Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Width Combinations on Rural, Two-Lane, Undivided Roads, Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Jan. 11–15, 2009. 16. Bonneson, J., D. Lord, K. Zimmerman, K. Fitzpatrick, and M. Pratt, Development of Tools for Evaluating the Safety Implications of Highway Design Decisions, Report 0-4703-4, prepared for Texas Department of Transporta- tion, Austin, 2007.