Transportation Improvement Program Revision Process (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

23 REFERENCES 1. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23 USC Parts 450.324 and 450.326. 2. Poorman, J., “Conflict or Confluence? MPO and State DOT Programming Responsibilities, from Key Issues in Transportation Programming: Summary of a Confer- ence,” Transportation Research Board Conference Pro- ceedings 43, Nov. 12–14, 2006, p. 14. 3. Johnson, A., Summary Report: MPO Peer Workshop on Addressing Financial Uncertainty & Year of Expenditure Requirements, RSG, Inc., prepared for the Transportation Research Board. Jan. 2008, p. 9. 4. Howard, C., “A Regional Perspective, from Key Issues in Transportation Programming: Summary of a Confer- ence,” Transportation Research Board Conference Pro- ceedings 43, Nov. 12–14, 2006, p. 7. 5. Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations, ARRA Information Survey Results, Dec. 2009. 6. Trabold, T., Summary Report: MPO Peer Workshop on Addressing Financial Uncertainty & Year of Expenditure Requirements, RSG, Inc. prepared for the Transportation Research Board. Jan. 2008, p. 10. 7. RSG, Inc., Summary Report: MPO Peer Workshop on Addressing Financial Uncertainty & Year of Expenditure Requirements, prepared for the Transportation Research Board, Jan. 2008, p. 15.