Inertial Profiler Certification for Evaluation of International Roughness Index (2018)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

92 AASHTO Standard R 57-14. Standard Practice for Operating Inertial Profiling Systems. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing and AASHTO Provisional Standards. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2017A. AASHTO Standard M 328-14. Standard Specification for Inertial Profiler. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing and AASHTO Provisional Standards. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2017B. AASHTO Standard R 56-14. Standard Practice for Certification of Inertial Profiling Systems. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing and AASHTO Provisional Standards. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2017C. AASHTO Standard R 43-13. Standard Practice for Quantifying Roughness of Pavements. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing and AASHTO Provisional Standards. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2017D. ASTM Standard E1926-08. Standard Practice for Computing International Roughness Index of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, Pa., 2017A. ASTM Standard E867-06. Standard Terminology Relating to Vehicle-Pavement Systems. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, Pa., 2017B. ASTM Standard E950-09. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling Reference. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, Pa., 2017C. ASTM Standard E1364-95. Standard Test Method for Measuring Road Roughness by Static Level Method. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, Pa., 2017D. Austroads Test Method AG:AM/T002. Validation of an Inertial Profilometer for Measuring Pavement Roughness (Reference Device Method), 2016A. https://www.onlinepublications.austroads.com.au/items/AGAM-T002-16. Accessed Mar. 15, 2017. Austroads Test Method AG:AM/T003. Validation of an Inertial Profilometer for Measuring Pavement Roughness (Loop Method), 2016B. https://www.onlinepublications.austroads.com.au/items/AGAM-T003-16. Accessed Mar. 15, 2017. Bendant, J. S., and A. G. Piersol. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971. Briggs, R. Selcom RoLine 1140 Wide Spot Laser Evaluation. Dynatest Internal Report. Dynatest Consulting, Starke, Fla., 2009. Brown, E. E., and L. A. Cooley. NCHRP Report 425: Designing Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures for Rut-Resistant Pavements. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ nchrp/nchrp_rpt_425.pdf. California DOT. Method of Test for Operation, Calibration, and Operator Certification of Inertial Profilers, 2017. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/ctms/pdf/CTM_387_03-14-14.pdf. Accessed Apr. 10, 2017. de León Izeppi, E. Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Smart Road Profiler Certification Results. Presented at 25th Annual Road Profiler User Group Meeting, San Antonio, Tex., 2013. http://www.rpug.org/download/ 2013/6-3-Edgar%20de%20León%20Izeppi.pdf. Accessed Apr. 10, 2017. Evans, L. D., and A. Eltahan. LTPP Profile Variability. Report FHWA-RD-00-113. FHWA, 2000. Federal Register. National Performance Management Measures: Assessing Pavement Condition for the National Highway Performance Program and Bridge Condition for the National Highway Performance Program. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2017. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-18/pdf/2017-00550.pdf. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. References

References 93 Fernando, E., and G. Harrison. Construction of New Profiler Certification Tracks. Report No. FHWA/TX-1315- 9047-1-1. Texas A&M Transportation Research Institute, College Station, 2013. Fernando, E. G., and R. S. Walker. Impact of Changes in Profile Measurement Technology on QA Testing of Pavement Smoothness. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6610-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, 2013. FHWA. Highway Statistics. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2015A. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinforma- tion/statistics.cfm. Accessed Apr. 10, 2017. FHWA. Status of Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2015B. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2015cpr/. Accessed Apr. 10, 2017. FHWA. Highway Performance Monitoring System Field Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/hpms/fieldmanual/hpms_field_manual_dec2016.pdf. Accessed Apr. 10, 2017. Gransberg, D., and D. M. B. James. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 342: Chip Seal Best Practices. Transpor- tation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005. Huber, G. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 284: Performance Survey on Open-Graded Friction Course Mixes. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/ nchrp_syn_284.pdf. Karamihas, S. M., T. D. Gillespie, R. W. Perera, and S. D. Kohn. NCHRP Report 434: Guidelines for Longitudinal Pavement Profile Measurement. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. Karamihas, S. M., and T. D. Gillespie. Assessment of Profiler Performance for Construction Quality Control: Phase I. Report No. UMTRI-2003-1, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2003. Karamihas, S.M. Use of Cross-Correlation for Objective Profile Comparison, Presented at the Expert Technical Group in Smoothness Meeting, Eastern Federal Lands, Virginia, 2003. Karamihas, S. M. Development of Cross-Correlation for Objective Comparison of Profiles. International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 36, Nos. 2/3, 2004, pp. 173–193. Karamihas, S. M. Critical Profiler Accuracy Requirements. Report UMTRI-2005-24. University of Michigan Trans- portation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2005. Karamihas, S. M. Benchmark Test Evaluation Report. FHWA Project Improving the Quality of Pavement Profile Measurements. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2011. www.pooledfund.org/ Document/Download/3140. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. Karamihas, S. M., and R. W. Perera. Evaluation of Potential Pavement Profile Reference Devices: 2013 Reference Profiler Benchmark Test Evaluation. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Report UMTRI-2014-31, 2014. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/109438?show=full. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. Michigan DOT. Manual for the Michigan Test Methods, 2015. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot_ MTM_CombinedManual_83501_7.pdf. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. Ministry of Transportation, Ontario. Test Method LS-296. Method of Test for Calibrating, Correlating, and Conducting Surface Smoothness Measurements Using an Inertial Profiler, Laboratory Testing Manual, 2017. https://www.raqsa.mto.gov.on.ca/RAQS_Contractor/RAQSCont.nsf/viewContractorBulletinQualifiedLabs/ 8F813018DDFE7AAD852572CE006B7CDA?OpenDocument. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. Minnesota DOT. MnDOT Inertial Profiler Certification Program, 2017. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/ smoothnessdocs/Certification_procedures_2017.pdf. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. NHI. Pavement Smoothness: Use of Inertial Profiler Measurements for Construction Quality Control, 2017. https://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/training/course_search.aspx?sf=0&course_no=131100. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. Perera, R. W., and S. D. Kohn. LTPP Data Analysis: Factors Affecting Pavement Smoothness. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w40-a.pdf. Accessed Mar. 15, 2017. Perera, R. W., S. D. Kohn, and C. R. Byrum. Smoothness Criteria for Concrete Pavements. FHWA, 2009. Perera, R. W., and S. M. Karamihas. Smoothness Criteria for Asphalt Concrete Pavements. FHWA, 2010. Perera, R. W. Study for Establishing Regional Certification Centers for Inertial Profilers, FHWA, 2014. http://www. pooledfund.org/Details/Study/280. Accessed July 24, 2017. Perera, R. W. and S. M. Karamihas. Evaluation of Potential Pavement Profile Reference Devices, 2015 Reference Profiler Evaluation. FHWA, 2017. Pierce, L. M., G. McGovern, and K. A. Zimmerman. Practical Guide for Quality Management of Pavement Condition Data Collection. Federal Highway Administration, 2013. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/ management/qm/data_qm_guide.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2017. ProVAL. View and Analyze Pavement Profiles. http://www.roadprofile.com/. Accessed Mar. 15, 2017. Sayers, M. W., T. D. Gillespie, and C. A. V. Queiroz. International Experiment to Establish Correlations and Standard Calibration Methods for Road Roughness Measurements. Technical Paper Number 45, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1986.

94 Inertial Profiler Certification for Evaluation of International Roughness Index Sayers, M. W. On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile. Transportation Research Record, No. 1501, 1995, pp. 1–12. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1995/1501/1501-001.pdf. Sayers, M. W., and S. M. Karamihas. The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information About Measuring and Inter- preting Road Profiles. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 1998. Smith, K. L., K. D. Smith, L. D. Evans, T. E. Hoerner, M. I. Darter, and J. H. Woodstrom. Smoothness Specifications for Pavements. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1997. https://www.nap.edu/read/6337/ chapter/1. Accessed Mar. 15, 2017. Texas DOT. Test Procedure for Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles, 2017. ftp://ftp.dot. state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cst/TMS/1000-S_series/pdfs/spe1001.pdf. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. UK Roads Board. Scanner Surveys for Local Roads, Use Guide and Specification, Volume 5, Technical Requirements for SCANNER Survey Parameters and Accreditation. Department of Transport, 2009. http://www.ukroads liaisongroup.org/en/utilities/document-summary.cfm?docid=EF0EDA49-AAA8-456A-8523547902CFA57F. Accessed Apr. 15, 2017. Winkler, C. B., S. M. Karamihas, M. E. Gilbert, and M. R. Hagan. Benchmark Profiler Field Manual, Version 2.7. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2016.