National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"Abbreviations and Acronyms." National Research Council. 1999. An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6366.
×

Abbreviations and Acronyms


ALARA

as low as reasonably achievable


CERCLA

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations


DOE

U.S. Department of Energy


EDTA

ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid

EIS

environmental impact statement

EM

Office of Environmental Management

EMSP

Environmental Management Science Program


FR

Federal Regulation


HTI

Hanford Tank Initiative

HLW

high-level waste


INEEL

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory


LAW

low-activity waste

LLW

low-level waste


MUST

miscellaneous underground storage tanks (at Hanford Site)


ORNL

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

OST

Office of Science and Technology (EM-50)


PRA

probabilistic risk assessment


RCRA

Resource, Conservation, and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended

ROD

record of decision


STCG

Site Technology Coordination Group


TFA

Tank Focus Area

TPA

Tri-Party Agreement (at Hanford Site)

TRU

transuranic

TWRS

Tank Waste Remediation System (at Hanford Site)


USAEC

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission

USEPA

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

USNRC

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Suggested Citation:"Abbreviations and Acronyms." National Research Council. 1999. An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6366.
×
Page 71
Next: Glossary »
An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks Get This Book
×
 An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks
Buy Paperback | $39.00 Buy Ebook | $31.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

A major issue in the cleanup of this country's nuclear weapons complex is how to dispose of the radioactive waste resulting primarily from the chemical processing operations for the recovery of plutonium and other defense strategic nuclear materials. The wastes are stored in hundreds of large underground tanks at four U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites throughout the United States. The tanks contain hundreds of thousands of cubic meters of radioactive and hazardous waste. Most of it is high-level waste (HLW), some of it is transuranic (TRU) or low- level waste (LLW), and essentially all containing significant amounts of chemicals deemed hazardous. Of the 278 tanks involved, about 70 are known or assumed to have leaked some of their contents to the environment. The remediation of the tanks and their contents requires the development of new technologies to enable cleanup and minimize costs while meeting various health, safety, and environmental objectives.

While DOE has a process based on stakeholder participation for screening and formulating technology needs, it lacks transparency (in terms of being apparent to all concerned decision makers and other interested parties) and a systematic basis (in terms of identifying end states for the contaminants and developing pathways to these states from the present conditions). An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks describes an approach for identifying technology development needs that is both systematic and transparent to enhance the cleanup and remediation of the tank contents and their sites. The authoring committee believes that the recommended end state based approach can be applied to DOE waste management in general, not just to waste in tanks. The approach is illustrated through an example based on the tanks at the DOE Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, the location of some 60 percent by volume of the tank waste residues.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!