Skip to main content

Principles and Operational Strategies for Staged Repository Systems Progress Report (2002) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Attachment B: Examples of Stakeholder Input in Repository Development
Pages 18-19

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 18...
... Finland: The Finnish staging process for siting a deep geologic repository is an example of balance between geologic and societal criteria through maximum community involvement and public confidence. Staging of the siting process in Finland started in the early '8Os.
Read the entire page →
From page 19...
... Do Madam Emu March PO, 2002 Page 19 ~ not possible to decay compare radloactve waste management programs in different counthes because of the different geology polecat economy, cuRurat demography and regulatory contexts.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • staging process
  • spent nuclear
  • deep geologic
  • geologic repository
  • achieving public

  • finnish staging
  • completely irreversible
  • community involvement
  • county board
  • decision sequence

  • public involvement
  • effective public
  • maximum community
  • swedish power
  • allows stakeholder

  • affected communities
  • public acceptance
  • societal criteria
  • technical challenges
  • power companies

  • stakeholder involvement
  • final disposal
  • concerns demand
  • intensively discussed
  • continuing societal

  • safety concerns
  • nuclear fuel
  • main actors
  • affected county
  • impact assessment


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.