Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

5 Recommendations for Future NARSTO Assessments
Pages 51-52

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 51...
... As discussed previously in this review, the committee finds that the current draft of the PM assessment falls short in the process and methods used to elicit information needs from decisionmakers and in communicating the policy implications of the science to them. The committee strongly recommends that social scientists with expertise in elicitation of information be engaged in developing policy guidance for future assessments.
From page 52...
... Without such strengthened cross-disciplinary links, NARSTO runs the risk of reducing the relevance of its science assessments to the larger air-quality management activity. The committee recommends that, in preparation for future assessments, NARSTO augment its activities to encompass a broader array of researchers in issues pertaining to air quality, such as human health, ecosystems, and economics and other social sciences.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.