Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix C: Performance Measures Used by Other Agencies and Organizations
Pages 165-176

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 165...
... and the U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board (SAB)
From page 166...
... Scores are normalized across the different directorates (Selden 1998~. PERFORMANCE MEASURES USED TO EVALUATE STATE-LEVEL PROGRAMS Many states have developed science and technology performance metrics to evaluate whether and how research programs are encouraging economic development.
From page 167...
... Texas The primary research effort in Texas is known as the Advanced Reevaluation efforts for ARP/ATP are coordinated by the Texas Higher Edu
From page 168...
... 168 The Measure of STAR
From page 169...
... Appendix C 169 cation Coordinating Board. Progress reports and final reports are used to track the impact of research projects.
From page 170...
... Kansas The Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation is responsible for managing grant programs for applied research and for equipment used in science and technology skill training. Examples of metrics used to evaluate programs are ranking of importance of commonly accepted economic development goals (such as, job creation, encouraging technologic innovation and entrepreneurial spirit, and literature review)
From page 171...
... Appendix C 171 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEASURES IN ACADEME Program evaluation is also used widely in academe, particularly in programs that involve improving educational opportunities and academic
From page 172...
... 172 The Measure of STAR
From page 173...
... The Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research EPSCOR is designed to improve the R&D competitiveness of states that have traditionally received smaller amounts of federal research and development funding based on a per capita comparison. The program requires a commitment on the part of the states to improve the quality of science and engineering research and training at colleges and universities.
From page 174...
... Benchmarks typically include questions about the quality ofthe peer-review process, detailed information about the strategic planning process, measures to determine the quality of program management, ability ofthe program to develop private-sector matching funds, the number of published peer-reviewed papers in relation to the size ofthe research program, and questions to gauge the social, economic, and scientific contributions of program research (NOAA, unpublished material, 1998~. CONCLUSIONS Federal research programs tend to focus more on the collection of product metrics than process metrics.
From page 175...
... Optional Worksheet for Organizing Data. Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, U.S.
From page 176...
... Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, and U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, Appendix III.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.