Skip to main content

Strengthening Peer Review in Federal Agencies That Support Education Research (2004) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

References
Pages 78-80

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 78...
... Précis for paper to be presented at the Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications, National Research Council, Washington, DC, February 25-26. Précis can be found at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/Core/PeerRevNatAcadSci 2-26-03.pdf.
Read the entire page →
From page 79...
... Paper prepared for the Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications, National Research Council, Washington, DC, February 25-26. Paper can be found at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/HacketChubin_ peer_review_paper.pdf.
Read the entire page →
From page 80...
... . Peer review practices at federal science agencies vary.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • educational research
  • educational researcher
  • review practices
  • research grant
  • information quality

  • grant applications
  • research partnership
  • scientifically based
  • quantitative impact
  • bad herrenalb

  • evaluating federal
  • scientific culture
  • revised information
  • strategic education
  • disastrous master

  • federal science
  • treacherous servant
  • paper prepared
  • akademie baden
  • research imperatives

  • rater training
  • scientific principles
  • invisible hand
  • performance appraisal
  • education reseearch

  • cancer research
  • policy evaluation
  • review program
  • oeri peer
  • priorities board


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.