Review of the U.S. CLIVAR Project Office (2004) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix A: Questionnaire Results
Appendix A: Questionnaire Results
Pages 23-28
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 23... ...
The committee received over 160 anonymous responses in that twoweek period; they are summarized below. DEMOGRAPHICS Question Response Percentage of Total Responses Q1: Please describe your educational High school/GED 0% background by selecting the box that Some college 0% indicates your highest completed education.
|
From page 24... ...
b Atlantic Implementation Panel 9% Pan American Implementation Panel 13% SIMAP 2% U.S. PAGES/CLIVAR Working Group 2% Asian-Australian Monsoon Working Group 7% CLIVAR-SEARCH Working Group 4% Q6: Please indicate if you had or International CLIVAR 30% currently have a formal role (i.e., GEWEX 17% steering groups, project offices, science panels)
|
From page 25... ...
96% 4% 161 CLIVAR Project Office. Q10: I receive or have received the CLIVAR 78% 22% 160 newsletters and/or email newsgrams
|
From page 26... ...
to communicate information about CLIVAR. Q13: The USCPO is 25% 42% 28% 5% 0% 153 communicating information about CLIVAR activities in a timely manner.
|
From page 27... ...
Q19: The USCPO 27% 37% 33% 4% 0% 83 adequately supports the U.S. Scientific Steering Committee and its various panels.
|
From page 28... ...
Q25: The USCPO is 13% 34% 34% 17% 2% 122 effective at facilitating interagency climate research and joint funding. Q26: There are 8% 22% 55% 14% 1% 103 structural impediments that prevent the USCPO from being more effective.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.