Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards Summary of Meetings (2006) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
5 Areas Needing Further Study
5 Areas Needing Further Study
Pages 17-20
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 17... ...
In the adversarial process scientific data generally are interpreted by expert witnesses employed by the plaintiffs or the defendants with no assurance of their scientific neutrality or the merit of their testimony (Hulka et al., 2000)
|
From page 18... ...
As a result academic scientists have been hesitant to testify as expert witnesses because they are concerned about the potential for bias and loss of their own credibility. Many scientists believe that being used by one side or the other in litigation could impugn their scientific integrity.
|
From page 19... ...
· What should students in law schools, graduate schools, and professional schools know about the law and the use of science in litigation? · What types of curricula could be developed to encour age understanding of multidisciplinary issues in law, graduate, and professional schools?
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.