Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

6.3 Overview Hearing: Balance of Funding at NASA
Pages 130-133

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 130...
... I am dealing here with the traditional space science disciplines: astrophysics, planetary exploration, heliophysics, and Earth science. Second, I want to discuss what I perceive is the future of human exploration and, finally, I will consider the balance of funding at NASA between space and Earth science and human space exploration.
From page 131...
... In space and Earth science, we have a similar measure of discipline health. In the decadal survey process, the community proposes missions that the survey evaluates, recommending funding only for the very best that fit in a funding model that is consistent with the expected funding for that discipline within NASA.
From page 132...
... It too was underfunded, which forced technical decisions that resulted in a vehicle that although capable was less reliable and far more costly to operate than initially anticipated. Under the adage that something is worth doing only if it is worth doing well, I suggest that we are at a major decision point in the human exploration program to return to the Moon.
From page 133...
... It is interesting to note that had space and Earth science in NASA received the same percentage increases as the NSF in FY2007 it would have followed its historical rate of growth in funding. There is an important policy decision to make.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.