Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 Current Technology Surprise Problems
Pages 9-16

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 9...
... While discussions were not restricted to the questions provided, the moderators used those questions to focus the two independent discussions around common issues and to address the symposium goal of elucidating trends that could be used to improve the DOD's technology warning capability. This chapter summarizes discussion topics from the first panel session that emphasized understanding current issues related to technology surprise from the perspective of COCOMs and other key S&TI consumer communities as well as S&TI producers.
From page 10...
... In the IC, there is a need for more scientists and technologists who understand the intelligence community culture and can help to both craft focused collection requirements and provide scientific data and insight on a continuing basis. It was acknowledged that even individuals with deep technical expertise may be poorly equipped to translate that knowledge into discrete indicators that would focus intelligence collection assets.
From page 11...
... As an example, a description of raw technical capabilities is not particularly useful to consumers out side the defense R&D community. S&TI information must be provided together with sufficient operational context to help consumers understand the potential impact if the capability is used against the United States on the battlefield.
From page 12...
... government agencies outside the IC. Participants again identified the need for the S&TI community to develop a stronger understanding of S&T advances in the United States, as well as worldwide, and to build networks with these communities.
From page 13...
... Sources of Future Technology Surprise Threats span a spectrum from individuals to small groups to nation-states. Rapid advancement of technologies and increasingly easy access to these technologies provides sophisticated capabilities to nation-states, non-state actors, and   or F additional information on ITAR and how it affects the exchange of unclassified, scientific information, please see the NRC report Beyond Fortress America: National Security Controls on Science and Technology in a Globalized World.
From page 14...
... The challenge of technology warning is further complicated by differing approaches stemming from strategic versus tactical actors. While nation-states generally implement longer-term strategies that leverage technological advances, individual adversaries (and insurgents)
From page 15...
... There was a general view that the 5- to 10-year time frame is very important, and that ignoring it leaves the United States very vulnerable to technology surprise. -- Longer-term forecasts are also important when considering initiation of major procurement efforts.
From page 16...
... Wide availability of increasing computational capabilities will continue and will enable more surprises. Participants described this phenomenon in terms of "lego blocks": today the United States invests great resources in creating technology that very soon will be packaged into plug-andplay components for use by the general public, including future adversaries.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.