Extending the Spectrum of Precompetitive Collaboration in Oncology Research Workshop Summary (2010) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix B: Polling Results
Appendix B: Polling Results
Pages 95-98
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 95... ...
biased toward seeing the value to collaborations, so the results featured below, though of interest, are by no means scientific or representative of the community of biomedical researchers. Responses Questions Percentage Count What organization do you represent?
|
From page 96... ...
Bioinformatics/software development 4 1 Data generation/collection efforts 35 8 Basic research 17 4 Translational/disease-focused research 35 8 Product-oriented research 9 2 What do you see as the biggest hurdle to precompetitive collaboration in biomedicine? Individualist/competitive culture among academics 30 6 Proprietary culture of industry 25 5 Intellectual property issues 25 5 Academic promotion/tenure process 15 3 Publications 0 0 Patient privacy concerns 5 1 How relevant/applicable are industry collaborations, such as SEMATECH, to biomedical research?
|
From page 97... ...
APPENDIX B Responses Questions Percentage Count How relevant/applicable are True Open Source Collaborations, such as Linux, to biomedical research? Not at all important 0 0 Somewhat important 26 5 Important 26 5 Very important 21 4 Critical 26 5
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.