Skip to main content

Testing of Body Armor Materials Phase III (2012) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix B Committee Meetings
Pages 264-267

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 264...
... Working, Ageing, and Temperature Effects on Roma Plastina #1 William Perciballi, Armor Works Development of a Standard Ballistics Testing Clay Isaac Peng, Chavant Pragmatics of Body Armor Testing -- Manufacturer Views Dave Reed, Ceradyne Commercial Body Armor Testing Perspectives Donn Dunn, H.P. White Laboratory Future Handling and Processing of Clay Christian Action, Action International Phenomenology and Material Response to High Velocity Impact Yogendra Gupta, Phase III Committee Member Pluses and Minuses of Clay and Future Alternatives James Zheng, PEO Soldier Gelatin as Future Testing Alternative Robert Kinsler, Army Research Laboratory (ARL)
Read the entire page →
From page 265...
... Marine Corps, PM-Infantry Combat Environment ARL/SOCOM Alternative Head Forms for Helmet Testing Robert Kinsler, ARL Dixie Hisley, ARL Biokinetic Head Form and Traumatic Brain Injury James Zheng, PEO Soldier Commercial Helmet Testing Perspectives Jim Martin, Chesapeake Labs Prather Study Findings Russell Prather, Phase III committee member Experimental Study of Behind-Armor or Blunt Thoracic Trauma in High-Rate Loading Conditions and Follow-on Studies Dale Bass, Phase III committee member BABTA and Other Recent Approaches to Blunt Trauma Measurement Michael Leggieri, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Center PEO Perspective on Blunt Trauma Research James Zheng, PEO Soldier Analysis of Blunt Trauma Casualties Edward Mazuchowski, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Perspectives on Electronic Sensors as a Future Alternative to Clay Adam Fournier, ATC Andrew Merkle, Johns Hopkins University -265
Read the entire page →
From page 266...
... SECOND COMMITTEE MEETING, OCTOBER 13-15, 2010 WASHINGTON, D.C. Summary of Instrumentation Working Group Site Visits Larry Lehowicz, committee chair Summary of Statistics Working Group Pentagon Discussions Larry Lehowicz, committee chair Alyson Wilson, committee member Ronald Fricker, Jr., committee member Update on Clay Experimentation and Specification Activities Shane Esola, ATC Differences in BFD Measurement Standards Richard Sayre, DOT&E Improvements in Helmet Measurement Robert Kinzler, ARL DATA-GATHERING SESSION, OCTOBER 18-19, 2010 KECK CENTER, WASHINGTON, D.C.
Read the entire page →
From page 267...
... PREPUBLICATION DRAFT -- SUBJECT TO EDITORIAL CORRECTION Committee members on the methodology working group conducted a datagathering session at the Keck Center. Questions on prospective post-Prather testing methodologies were posed via telephone to Dixie Hisley, ARL; Andrew Merkle, Johns Hopkins University; Stephen Vatner, New Jersey Medical School; and Weixin Shen, L-3/TRACOR.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • iii committee
  • james zheng
  • peo soldier
  • phase iii
  • dixie hisley

  • blunt trauma
  • larry lehowicz
  • maj william
  • william lash
  • testing perspectives

  • andrew merkle
  • robert kinsler
  • shane esola
  • testing alternative
  • commercial body

  • body armor
  • atc road
  • arl nist
  • findings russell
  • traumatic brain

  • alternatives james
  • visits larry
  • chesapeake labs
  • pentagon discussions
  • testing linda

  • atc statistics
  • perspectives jim
  • demonstration maj
  • brain injury
  • dale bass


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.