Skip to main content

Remediation of Buried Chemical Warfare Materiel (2012) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix D: Review of Regulatory Programs
Pages 112-118

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 112...
... , example, although EPA did not identify chemical agents as i ncluding those containing chemical warfare materiel hazardous waste, most of the stockpile states have specifi(CWM) , would be assessed, investigated, characterized, and cally listed chemical agents as hazardous waste under their cleaned up: the corrective action program under the Resource RCRA programs.
Read the entire page →
From page 113...
... For example, if a CAMU when conventional and chemical munitions become subject is established at Redstone Arsenal, pending regulatory to RCRA requirements. Although the MR provided many approval, remediation waste generated at Camp Sibert could clarifications regarding classification of military munitions 367 4http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/rcra/RCRAAdministrativeOrders.
Read the entire page →
From page 114...
... Most notably, if a site is and Liability Act not listed on the NPL, DOD and other federal land managers CERCLA is implemented through the National Oil and must conduct removal and remedial actions in accordance Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) with state laws and requirements.
Read the entire page →
From page 115...
... . Although most of the treaty OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATORY PROGRAMS requirements pertain to destruction of chemical-weapons stockpiles in nations that stockpiled these materials, there Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol are treaty requirements that apply to non-stockpile materials, including RCWM.
Read the entire page →
From page 116...
... If an active installation with CERCLA units is also an RCRA-permitted BRAC installations are similar to active installations with facility or is closing under RCRA, RCRA corrective action respect to RCRA corrective action vs CERCLA requireand CERCLA requirements apply to the same MRS at the ments. Some MRSs at BRAC sites will be addressed under same time.
Read the entire page →
From page 117...
... It may and location of the site, the site may become a FUDS. The also be used at BRAC sites or at non-BRAC closures, such Spring Valley site in Washington, D.C., was initiated as an as Rocky Mountain Arsenal, where a federal land manager emergency response in 1993 and has become one of the retains control over future land use.
Read the entire page →
From page 118...
... 1990. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency of contamination, CAMUs used for storage and treatment, Plan ("National Contingency Plan")
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • rcra corrective
  • remediation waste
  • operational ranges
  • active installations
  • munitions response

  • hazardous waste
  • chemical warfare
  • military munitions
  • warfare materiel
  • emergency response

  • hazardous substances
  • buried cwm
  • remedial investigation
  • rcra facilities
  • cercla cleanup

  • response action
  • federal land
  • remediation wastes
  • interim guidance
  • remedial actions

  • rcra requirements
  • munitions rule
  • corrective actions
  • waste management
  • pollution contingency

  • substances pollution
  • treaty requirements
  • management units
  • regulatory programs
  • brac sites


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.