Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix C: Supplement to Chapter 3: Descriptions of Additional Organizational CP&A Processes and Tools
Pages 113-128

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 113...
... elements, 1Further information on MDA's testing and capabilities analysis process is available through the MDA web site: "Supporting Efforts: Ballistic Missile Defense Testing." Available at http://www.mda. mil/system/testing.html.
From page 114...
... strategy FIGURE C-1 The Missile Defense Agency's (MDA's) Warfighter Involvement Process.
From page 115...
... The MDA is exempt from the JCIDS process, which streamlines decision time lines somewhat and has fostered the development of a set of analysis tools that continue to evolve. OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE OFFICE The Operationally Responsive Space (ORS)
From page 116...
... STRATCOM ESTABLISH DEFINE ORS Office NEED APPROACH Partners w/ JFCCs Needs/Ideas ORS ACQUIRE Concepts & CAPABILITY Solutions Partners Solve with ORS Existing Acquisition Systems DEPLOY Solve Solve with New with Capability & EMPLOY Existing Partners Systems STRATCOM w/ JFCCs Needed capabilities employed to produce requested effects for JFC FIGURE C-2 The Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) Office process provides three tiers of re sponse.
From page 117...
... Here, requirements are defined, prioritized, and validated; then a solu tions analysis process follows, which is ultimately presented to CDRUSSTRATCOM and the EA for Space. In addition to using subject-matter experts, the ORS Office uses several tools that fall into five categories, described briefly below.
From page 118...
... . The key is getting the purpose analysis and problem framing done right up-front, by converting the Statement of Need from the requesting Joint Force Commander or Joint Functional Component Commander into the Capabilities Requirements Document (CRD)
From page 119...
... Observation and Attributes The ORS process is streamlined in that it takes typically well-defined, "urgent" requirements from Joint Force Commanders, develops alternative solutions, and presents recommendations directly to CDRUSSTRATCOM and the DoD EA for Space, substantially reducing the time line for decisions. The process takes into consideration ISR capabilities across the enterprise.
From page 120...
... SOURCE: Maj Gen Susan Mashiko, Deputy Director, National Reconnaissance Office. "Briefing to C-5.eps the Committee on Examination of the Air Force ISR CP&A Process." Presentation to the committee, December 8, 2011.
From page 121...
... RAND CORPORATION The RAND Corporation uses two main systems engineering tools: the Systems and CONOPS Operational Effectiveness Model (SCOPEM) developed by RAND and the SEAS Modeling Environment maintained and developed by ExoAnalytic Solutions for the Air Force Space Command, Space and Missile Systems Center, Directorate of Development Planning (SMC/XR)
From page 122...
... "The Systems and CONOPS Operational Effectiveness Model (SCOPEM) and Systems Effectiveness Analysis Simulation (SEAS)
From page 123...
... military networks.5 USCYBERCOM plans, coordinates, integrates, synchronizes, and conducts activities to direct the operations and defense of specified DoD in formation networks; and to prepare to and, when directed, conduct full-spectrum military cyberspace operations in order to enable actions in all domains, to ensure U.S./Allied freedom of action in cyberspace, and to deny the same to adversaries. The command is charged with pulling together existing cyberspace resources, creating synergy and synchronizing warfighting effects to defend the information security environment.6 USCYBERCOM is tasked with centralizing the command of cyberspace operations, strengthening DoD cyberspace capabilities, and integrating and bolstering DoD's cyber expertise.
From page 124...
... Rollins, Deputy Director of the Joint Intelligence Operations Center, USCYBERCOM, Directorate of Intelligence (J2)
From page 125...
... . This layered analysis process is used to conduct rapid, system-of-systems capabilities-based analysis of air- and space based ISR systems to identify effective force mix options for DoD and IC needs.15 NGC-described attributes of this process include agility, visibility, flexibility and 10Michele Weslander-Quade, Chief Technology Officer, Google, Inc.
From page 126...
... and is currently being used in support of the Operationally Responsive Space Office and the Missile Defense Agency for capabil 16Kurt Dittmer, Advanced Programs and Technology, Advanced Projects Director, Northrop Grum man Corporation. "Layered ISR Architecture Analysis, Collection Capability Discussion." Presentation to the committee, January 5, 2012.
From page 127...
... optimized orbit locations based on unique system-of-systems solution and platform CONOPS. In summary, the NGC physics-based analysis layered ISR tool suite was created to improve decision making.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.