Guidelines for Analysis of Investments in Bicycle Facilities (2006) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix I: Field Testing
Appendix I: Field Testing
Pages 104-108
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 104... ...
• An article in the April 22, 2005, edition of Centerlines, the newsletter of the National Center for Bicycling and Walking To augment this "public" field testing track, the research team extended personal invitations to the following select group of bicycle planners and advocates to test and offer comments on the guidelines: Planners • Josh Lehman, Massachusetts State Bicycle Coordinator • Randy Thoreson of the National Parks Service Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program, St. Paul • Tom Huber, State of Wisconsin Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator • Charlotte Claybrooke, State of Washington Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator • Drusilla van Hengel, Mobility Coordinator, City of Santa Barbara • Paul Magarey, Chair, Australian Bicycle Council Advocates • Chuck Ayers, Cascade Bicycle Club • Louise McGrody, Bicycle Alliance of Washington • Peg Staeheli, SVR Design Company • Emily Allen, Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board These individuals were selected on the basis of referrals or because they represented geographic areas or communities that would likely have good use for the tool.
|
From page 105... ...
and part of the University of North Carolina School of Public Health in Chapel Hill. As part of their aim, ALBD is providing $200,000 grants to community-oriented partnerships to develop and implement strategies that increase opportunities for and remove barriers to routine physical activity.
|
From page 106... ...
Paul • Tom Huber, State of Wisconsin Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator • Josh Lehman, Massachusetts State Bicycle Coordinator • Charlotte Claybrooke, State of Washington Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator • Drusilla van Hengel, Mobility Coordinator, City of Santa Barbara Responses from General Announcements • Jennifer Toole, Toole Design Group • Anne Lusk, Harvard School of Public Health • Jim Coppock, City of Cincinnati • Heath Maddox, Associate Transportation Planner, City of Berkeley • Andriana McMullen, Capital Regional District, British Columbia Internal Research Team • David Loutzenheiser, Planners Collaborative • Don Kidston, Planners Collaborative • Bill Hunter, UNC Highway Safety Research Center • Libby Thomas, UNC Highway Safety Research Center • Gary Barnes, Active Communities Transportation (ACT) Research Group, University of Minnesota • Gavin Poindexter, Active Communities Transportation (ACT)
|
From page 107... ...
Finally, I-4 a number of respondents offered broad methodological comments that could be incorporated into future research. The following outlines the range of comments that the research team was able to address through changes to the guidelines.
|
From page 108... ...
Future Research Possibilities (outside scope of immediate project) In addition to issues that were impractical to address because of resource constraints, other comments offered ideas that were beyond the research scope of this project but should be considered for future study: • Costs and benefits should include information about safety in terms of crashes.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.