Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Air-Pollutant Distribution and Trends
Pages 29-46

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 29...
... The highest NO emission density is over the states north of the Ohio and east of the Mississippi rivers. There are substantial differences in the emission trends of smaller regions within eastern North America.
From page 30...
... la' lb. Emission densities, g/m2/yr for the year 1977-78 of man-made SOx and NOx over North America (Husar and Holloway, 1983)
From page 31...
... 2. Sulfur emission density, g/m2/yr for regions north and south of the Ohio River (Husar, 1985~.
From page 32...
... north of the Ohio River compared to the south. WET DEPOSITION DATA FOR SULFATE, NITRATE, AND AMMONIA Motivated by increasing concern about "acid rain," at least five major precipitation chemistry networks have operated over North America since 1978.
From page 33...
... 4. Maps of sulfate wet deposition rate, (g/m2/yr)
From page 34...
... As for sulfate wet deposition, the "background" nitrate deposition would account for 20-40% of the measured nitrate deposition in precipitation. Over eastern North America, the corresponding background contribution would be 10-25% of the total measured wet deposition.
From page 35...
... in Europe (EMEP network average)
From page 36...
... ammonia emission from the above "known" sources is estimated at 3.4 Tg N/yr with the highest emission density in the corn belt region exceeding 1 g N/m2/yr. There is a rough coincidence of the area of high measured deposition rate and estimated emission density, both extending through the corn belt region.
From page 37...
... 6. Maps of nitrate wet deposition rate (g/m2/yr)
From page 38...
... 8. Estimated emission density of ammonia emissions for the U.S.
From page 39...
... in Europe (EMEP network average)
From page 40...
... VISIBILITY Atmospheric optical data are much more abundant on a continental scale than chemical composition data, with the exception of the water vapor content. Hence, if a reasonably well defined relationship can be established between, for example, the visual range or turbidity and the fine particle content of the atmosphere, then the extensive meteorological observations by human observers inherent in the interpretation of the visibility data obtained by routine meteorological observation networks.
From page 41...
... 10. Mean diurnal maximum ozone concentration isopleths for August 19781981 (Vukovich et al., 1985~.
From page 42...
... to ~ ~ 1 a, 42 Levi ' :11:~ 'a , Cot c, a C)
From page 43...
... states will exhibit trends in fine particle concentration consistent with their own emission trends. In other words, the long-term haze data base confirms the most revealing conclusion of the European OECD project, namely that-every source region impacts on itself more than on any other region.
From page 44...
... The trend lines indicate mean and arithmetic standard deviation among the stations within each region, b.-d. Trends of extinction coefficient by yearly quarters for New England southeastern sun belt, and the Smoky Mountain region (Husar et al.,
From page 45...
... 1985. Manmade SOX and NOX emission and trends of Eastern North America.
From page 46...
... The trend lines indicate mean and arithmetic standard deviation among the stations within each region; b.-d. Trends of extinction coefficient by yearly quarters for New England, southeastern sun belt, and the Smoky Mountain region (Husar et al., 1979~.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.