Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 78-83

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 78...
... 15.1 Summary of Current Practices Current practices and research needs were determined based upon the results of a literature review and a survey of State and Canadian Provincial transportation agencies. A literature review on the repair and maintenance of longitudinal barriers revealed the following: • There appears to be no scientific basis for the existing national guardrail repair guidelines.
From page 79...
... Depending on individual conditions at a specific site, however, the probability of a second impact to a previously damaged longitudinal barrier will vary considerably. The determination of the risk of a second collision is beyond the scope of this document but should be another factor that 79 Damage Mode Pendulum Tests Full-Scale Crash Tests Finite Element Modeling Rail / Post Deflection x x x Vertical Tear x Horizontal Tear x Twisted Blockout x Missing Blockout x Splice Damage x Hole in Rail x Missing Posts x Post-Rail Separation x Rail Flattening x Generic End Terminal Damage Table 29.
From page 80...
... . 15.3.3 Guidance for Substantial Barrier Damage National guidance regarding the repair of w-beam barriers is provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
From page 81...
... Summary of W-Beam barrier repair threshold guidelines. (continued on next page)
From page 82...
... B 2 or fewer posts are broken or separated from the rail element.
From page 83...
... The finite element modeling was applied to only some of the damage types, and if extended to other damage modes could yield further insight into the crash performance of damaged barriers. • Conduct additional full-scale crash tests of damaged longitudinal barriers both as a means to evaluate the crash performance of these systems, and to provide an additional source of finite element model validation data.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.