Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 5-15

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 5...
... The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2007) , however, limit the yield strength of reinforcing steel to 75 ksi for most applications.
From page 6...
... 1.2 Objectives of NCHRP Project 12-77 The objective of the study presented in this report is to evaluate existing AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications relevant to the use of high-strength reinforcing steel and other grades of reinforcing steel having no discernable yield plateau. The focus of the experimental phase of this study is the use of ASTM A1035 (2009)
From page 7...
... Representative Stress-Strain Curves for A1035 and A615 Reinforcing Steel.
From page 8...
... Mast et al. studied the behavior of concrete beams subject to flexural and axial loads at service level and nominal strength and determined the section behavior using a cracked section analysis that satisfied equilibrium and compatibility.
From page 9...
... . 1.3.4 Shear Reinforcement The shear behavior of reinforced-concrete beams is not well understood and calculation of the shear strength is based on semi-empirical relationships.
From page 10...
... . Strength and deformability of concrete are known to be inversely proportional; therefore, more confinement is required in order for high-strength concrete columns to reach levels of deformation expected of well-detailed normal-strength concrete columns.
From page 11...
... (2009) assessed the present empirical development length equations prescribed by ACI 318 (2008)
From page 12...
... approach of directly assessing cracking behavior of concrete beams was dropped by ACI 318 in 1999 and by AASHTO in 2005 in favor of a simplified version of the alternative approach proposed by Frosch (1999 and 2001) that prescribed spacing limits for longitudinal reinforcing steel thereby indirectly controlling crack width.
From page 13...
... In the commentary to §5.7.3.4, AASHTO describes the use of the γd term to calibrate Equation 5 for any desired crack width limitation. It is well established that crack control is improved by using a larger number of well-distributed, smaller diameter bars to make up the required area of flexural reinforcing steel.
From page 14...
... A summary of corrosion performance of reinforcing steel is presented in Appendix A and provides quantitative data available in the literature. 1.4 Survey of Use of High-Strength Steel Reinforcement in Bridge Structures A written survey intended to assess the current practice and the use of high-strength reinforcing steel was disseminated in June 2007.
From page 15...
... 1.4.2 Reported Use of A1035 Reinforcing Steel in Highway Bridge Infrastructure MMFX Inc., the only supplier of A1035 reinforcing steel, reports 25 U.S. and 4 Canadian jurisdictions that have used A1035 reinforcing steel in at least one bridge project as of December 2009.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.