Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 12-17

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 12...
... development of appropriate resistance factors for use in LRFD that account for metal loss caused by corrosion. Calibration of the resistance factors uses load factors from the AASHTO LRFD specifications C H A P T E R 2 Research Approach
From page 13...
... In particular, resistance factors for design of MSE walls are recommended that take into account the estimated metal loss over the service life of the installation. Metal loss parameters will be updated as appropriate for galvanized and plain steel reinforcements, while taking into consideration different backfill characteristics.
From page 14...
... assessed the load bias for metallic MSE reinforcements using the simplified and coherent gravity methods of analysis, respectively. We have used the load bias from these references to calibrate resistance factors for LRFD.
From page 15...
... of lognormal load bias. Strip Grid Parameter Simplified Method1 Coherent Gravity Method2 Simplified Method1 Coherent Gravity Method2 0.973 1.294 0.973 1.084 0.449 0.499 0.449 0.737 1Allen et al.
From page 16...
... 16 Figure 5. Monte Carlo simulation example showing input and output reports.
From page 17...
... If the metal loss is assumed to be deterministic, the only variable (i.e., not a constant) describing the tensile strength remaining at the end of service condition corresponds to yield strength, Fy.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.