Preservation Approaches for High-Traffic-Volume Roadways (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 76-78
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 76... ...
One of the most significant barriers that can be expected is the resistance to allowing the use of preservation treatments traditionally linked to lower-volume roadways, such as microsurfacing and chip seals, on higher-volume roads. There will certainly be skepticism that certain preservation treatments are not durable enough for use on high-volume roads, particularly those in severe climates.
|
From page 77... ...
Pavement preservation engineers should be able to explain the value of preservation treatments now, compared with the cost of major repairs later. Also, since preservation activities do entail work zones that disrupt traffic and present safety hazards, preservation engineers must also be able to document and communicate the tradeoffs between shorter work zone durations now versus much longer ones in the future.
|
From page 78... ...
These activities will give the treatment the best possible chance of performing successfully and reducing the likelihood of premature failure. Issue 6: Heightened Battles for Dedicated Funding As is often the case with the development of pavement preservation programs, gaining the commitment of top-level management is vital to the successful implementation of preservation guidelines for high-traffic-volume roads.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.