A Guidebook for Successful Communication, Cooperation, and Coordination Strategies Between Transportation Agencies and Tribal Communities (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 14-17
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 14... ...
The relationship between federal and tribal governments has been widely codified by the U.S. Constitution, legislation, executive orders, and Supreme Court cases.
|
From page 15... ...
Finally, efforts initiated in Arizona that may result in the establishment of a formal intergovernmental network are discussed. 3.4.1 Minnesota On April 1, 2002, at a tribal/state transportation summit, the state of Minnesota, the 11 tribes within the state, and the FHWA signed the Government-to-Government Transportation Accord for improved cooperation as partners in transportation planning and programs (27)
|
From page 16... ...
3.4.2 North Dakota In North Dakota, the establishment of both tribal consultation and an intergovernmental network were enacted through the Programmatic Agreement that was signed on November 28, 2006, by the North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT) , the FHWA and the consulting tribes of North Dakota – including tribes in South Dakota, Minnesota and Montana that retain historical and cultural ties to the state (28)
|
From page 17... ...
. These summits resulted in tribal leaders in Arizona expressing the need for a guide to be used by all state agencies when consulting with tribal governments in order to facilitate the government-to-government relationships between the state and the tribes.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.