Competition Requirements of the Design/Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Public-Private Partnership Contracts—Seven Case Studies (2012) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 12-16
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 12... ...
No one was found at fault, so BART bore the $1 million delay cost.20 Further, the excavation operations were slowed by tough site conditions; soils encountered were so rigid and hard that sheet pilings were bent during installation.21 The design-builder had to implement overtime and weekend work to speed up the project. Substantial change orders were issued, but no formal claims were filed by the contractor or BART officials.
|
From page 13... ...
• Final Design Submittal. • Contract Documents.
|
From page 14... ...
DART Green Line Evaluation Criteria Item Points Project Approach 300 Project Personnel 200 Team Composition/Subcontracting Opportunities 200 Firm/Team Experience 200 Oral Presentations (If Required) 100 Proposal Risk Assessment 100 Total 1,100 Table 2 briefly describes the subcriteria and the points considered for the criteria project approach through firm/team experience.
|
From page 15... ...
DART Green Line Proposal Risk Assessment Risk Rating Definition High (0–49 points) Likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance.
|
From page 16... ...
Dispute Resolution A DRB was established to assist in the resolution of disputes, including claims and other controversies, arising out of the work of this contract. This provision describes the purpose, procedure, function, and key features of the DRB.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.