Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 29-32

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 29...
... The primary basis for its claims rested on adverse weather, although LGS also argued that it was delayed by delays in utility relocation and WMATA's failure to obtain right-of-way access. WMATA initially disputed LGS's argument that the delays it experienced were excusable delays that impacted activities on the critical path.
From page 30...
... The Portland Mall Light Rail Extension Project and the I-205 Light Rail Extension Project together form the I-205/Portland Mall Light Rail Extension Project, which is the first phase of the South Corridor Project. Phase 1 was proposed to bring the MAX Green Line service to I205 between Clackamas Town Center and Gateway, where it would then use the existing MAX Blue and Red line tracks to downtown Portland, and then run on new tracks along the Portland Mall to Portland State University.
From page 31...
... Selection and Award Criteria The EC evaluated the submitted written proposals on the basis of certain predetermined criteria and set a score for each criterion, totaling to a maximum of 150 points. Each criterion was further divided into subcriteria with scores associated with them.
From page 32...
... Group Criterion 3: Price. -- The proposing firms had to provide a not-to-exceed price based on the units and scope of the project as identified in the RFP. In addition, the firms were required to provide their "fixed fee" for construction services as a firm, lump-sum price, inclusive of all the services mentioned in the RFP.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.