Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 3-8

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 3...
... Still, public-sector experience in the use of such delivery systems remains immature, and public agencies are generally unprepared to execute workable arrangements with the private sector. Despite the recent resurgence of alternative project delivery methods, many within the construction industry continue to misunderstand the characteristics and implications of each system.
From page 4...
... By 1994, a group of major trade and professional associations formed the Design and Construction Procurement Coalition to promote the adoption of legislation allowing federal agencies to have broader discretion to consider DB. Among the specific goals of the coalition was to codify a shortlist procedure through the use of a two-phase procurement process.
From page 5...
... Likewise, the National Conference on State Legislatures regularly publishes annual updates of legislation affecting the transportation sector. An update from 2010 can be found at http://www.ncsl.org/documents/transportation/PPPTOOLKITAppendE.pdf.
From page 6...
... • Colorado: SB 108 authorized PPPs for transportation projects on state and local projects; DB is permitted as the project delivery method. (Colorado Revised Statutes Sections 43-1-1404.)
From page 7...
... The process for selecting a design-builder will depend on whether the CTC authorizes the procuring agency to use competitive bidding or a best-value process. For procurements involving competitive bidding, bidders would be required to provide sealed bids including lump sum prices, and award would be made to the lowest responsible bidder amongst the prequalified bidders.
From page 8...
... As noted above, Arizona has one of the most progressive alternative project delivery statutes in the United States. As is the case with DB, Arizona law allows an agency to use CMAR to procure construction services on a qualifications basis, with price not a factor.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.