Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 The Committee's Framework
Pages 23-34

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 23...
... For example, the framework does not framework should address safer chemical select the factors to be used to determine substitution. Therefore, the committee's whether an alternative is safer than the chemical alternatives assessment framework represents a of concern because this decision is context structured approach for comparing human dependent and based on value judgments.
From page 24...
... It could following: also include reducing exposure potential, such as by replacing an aquatic toxicant with another  The goal of chemical alternatives assessments chemical that has some aquatic toxicity, but conducted using the committee's framework is breaks down quickly or has low solubility. The to identify safer alternatives that can be used to definition of "lower overall negative impact to replace chemicals of concern in products or human health and the environment" is context processes, thereby protecting and enhancing dependent and based on value judgments; human health and the environment.10 It is therefore, the selection of hazard end points for understood that the safer alternatives would comparison and their relative importance are also meet other requirements, such as cost and left to the discretion of the entity conducting performance.
From page 25...
... This step should determine appropriate initiation of chemical alternatives assessments stakeholder engagement; identify goals, principles, for innovative green chemistry alternatives and and decision rules that will guide the assessment; sustainable designs, instead of only conducting gather information on the chemical of concern; and chemical alternatives assessments when there is determine assessment methods that will be used. a chemical of interest to replace.
From page 26...
... 26 A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives FIGURE 3-1 Framework developed by the committee.
From page 27...
... A effects of the original substance also helps in more complete discussion of goals, principles, and establishing human health and ecological goals decision rules and their impacts on alternatives for the alternatives. A more complete assessments can be found in Chapters 4 and 9.
From page 28...
... A more complete discussion of the the assessment. Chapter 4 includes a more complete planning activities associated with this step can be discussion on identifying and screening potential found in Chapter 4.
From page 29...
... Chapter 7 has a more complete discussion about assessing the ecological hazards of alternatives. Inputs: List of potential alternatives and preliminary data on each alternative from Step 3 and physicochemical properties from Step 5.
From page 30...
... In addition, this step is Outputs: List of safer alternatives and supporting intended to determine whether human health, documentation for each, including actions needed to environmental, and social equity impacts might occur offset trade-offs or detect unintended consequences. at a place or time other than the point of use of the List of unacceptable alternatives, including chemical of concern.
From page 31...
... , a qualitative assessment might be sufficient to inform substitution decisions. Goal: Use additional life cycle assessment methods Chapter 10 has a more complete discussion of this to estimate energy consumed and materials emitted step.
From page 32...
... Inputs: Results of evaluations of each alternative. Outputs: List of acceptable alternatives and Step 9.3: Economic Assessment supporting documentation for each, including actions Goal: Assess economic impacts associated with needed to offset trade-offs or detect unintended each alternative if an economic analysis is within the consequences.
From page 33...
... , or even potential Several frameworks include ranking or recommendations for regulatory action. Chapter 11 categorizing alternatives to select the best ones for includes a more complete discussion of this step.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.