Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Stakeholder Interests and Issues
Pages 17-20

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... Input from local stakeholders was sought through and decisions. As described in Review of Secondary Waste Disposal Planning for the Blue Grass and Pueblo Chemical • Open discussion at the July NRC and CAC meetings.
From page 18...
... at the CAC meeting, the CAC chair expressed the hope that A comparison of the CAC statement presented by the the NRC study would be placed on a shelf and not actually CAC chair at the NRC Hydrolysate Committee meeting be used. She emphasized that from the CAC's perspective, if (see Appendix B, Exhibit 3)
From page 19...
... Discussion during a conference call with staff from the sound working relationships that PCAPP and the CAC the PCAPP public affairs office, the CDPHE, and the CAC have been developing over many years. It would aim to indicated that chemical materiel activities at PCAPP were not ensure regular, open communication throughout operations, a significant concern.2 The public affairs officer noted that enhancing the probability that program goals can be achieved interest levels varied over time, according to activity levels despite differing priorities.
From page 20...
... PCAPP staff have developed a sound work- holder consultation in the determination of the need for ing relationship with the CAC and local stakeholders that offsite shipments, advance planning on associated regulatory serves as a foundation for establishing a credible consulta- and plant issues for such shipment should be expedited. tion process.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.