Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix G: Energy Intensity Comparisons for Water, Rail, and Highway
Pages 196-200

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 196...
... (2013) .1 These average energy intensity values represent the two-way transport average of upstream and downstream transport (upstream transport may require more energy to account for barge movement against downstream current velocities, and downstream transport energy may benefit from the river current)
From page 197...
... reported that unit grain trains moving from Iowa to New Orleans, Louisiana, had route-specific fuel efficiency of 640 ton-miles per gallon, 54 percent better than energy intensity for an average train. Analysis of Selected Major Waterway Corridors The committee examined route comparisons across major waterway corridors with respect to metrics important to modal performance: (a)
From page 198...
... Btu per Ton Moved Difference Using Water Mode Rail average value 650 294 191,100 Water (using Davis et al. 2014 average value)
From page 199...
... The calculations for typical corridor-scale routes show that barge movements on the Ohio River and Lower Mississippi River use more energy than rail transport for the same origin– destination pairs, if system-average energy intensities are assumed, but that typical corridor-scale routes on the Upper and Lower Mississippi River and the Columbia River corridors may be more energy efficient than rail transport.
From page 200...
... 2008. The Mississippi River System Shallow Draft Barge Market -- Perfectly Competitive or Oligopolistic?


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.