Review Criteria for Successful Treatment of Hydrolysate at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant (2015) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Summary
Summary
Pages 1-7
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 1... ...
Also, 1 BGCAPP is called a pilot plant because some of the processes used for destroying the agent have never before been used in this application, or 4 Letter Report: The Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant's used in combination with each other. Water Recovery System, 2012, and Assessment of Supercritical Water Oxida 2 The mustard stockpile at BGAD will be disposed of onsite using an tion System Testing for the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot explosive destruction technology; it will not be processed through BGCAPP.
|
From page 2... ...
believe should guide decisions regarding potential offsite shipment. Several conference calls were also conducted, both Should SCWO or WRS problems develop, substan- with CAC/CDCAB representatives and with PEO ACWA and tial storage capacity exists at BGCAPP, allowing time to BGCAPP public involvement officials.
|
From page 3... ...
Recommendation 3-1. In collaboration with the CAC/ Recommendation 4-5. As a backup plan, BGCAPP should CDCAB, the Program Executive Office for Assembled consult with KDEP concerning whether the RCRA RD&D Chemical Weapons Alternatives should institutionalize a permit could be modified to allow the temporary offsite transparent consultation process that builds on the existing transport of GB hydrolysate (i.e., until the SCWO can be foundation and working group structure to ensure meaning- brought back on line) or for the temporary or permanent ful stakeholder input into analyses, evaluations, and decision offsite transport of SCWO effluent should the WRS process criteria related to potential offsite shipment of hydrolysate be shown to be irreparable.
|
From page 4... ...
The main risk of SCWO efflu- necessarily result in offsite shipment. However, if modificaent shipment would come from a substantial increase in the tions made during systemization to achieve these goals do number of offsite shipments and the associated increase in not result in improved performance, then consideration of the likelihood of a crash.
|
From page 5... ...
. Underperformance and Failure Risks, Systemization, and Contingency Options for the Water Recovery System Finding 7-1. BGCAPP scientists and engineers have identified a number of challenges that may be encountered in the The WRS consists of three SCWO effluent storage tanks, operation of the SCWO system at BGCAPP and are taking a pretreatment system to remove suspended solids, three RO appropriate corrective actions to address these challenges.
|
From page 6... ...
Should the decision be made to ship hydrolysate or SCWO Finding 7-13. Since many WRS process details are effluent offsite, additional infrastructure would be needed to unknown, including the amount of solids in the SCWO efficiently and effectively transfer the material for shipment. effluent, the amount of solids that settle in the SCWO effluent Infrastructure additions would likely be minimal but might storage tanks, and coagulant requirements and effectiveness, include additional piping, leak containment, agent monitors, successful operation of the current WRS direct filtration waste loading areas, truck loading docks, new rail/roadways multimedia pretreatment system is uncertain.
|
From page 7... ...
2013. Assessment of Supercritical Water Oxidation System Testing for would be created in the decision process if these measures are the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.