Skip to main content

Review of the Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation Review #2 (2018) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix D Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings
Pages 49-51

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 49...
... , Bill Bates, project leader, SRNL, with Michael Stone, SRNL, and Thomas Brouns, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory • Perspective Regarding Congressional Interests About Cleanup at the Hanford Site, David Bearden, Congressional Research Service • Perspective from Government Accountability Office's Reports on Treatment Options for Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Site, David Trimble and Nathan Anderson, U.S. Government Accountability Office • Independent Assessment of Challenges Concerning Cleanup at the Hanford Site, Robert Alvarez, Senior Scholar, Institute for Policy Studies Public Comments • John Greeves, independent consultant • Suzanne Dahl, Washington State Department of Ecology • Geoff Fettus, Natural Resources Defense Council • Ian Pegg, Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America PUBLIC MEETING #2: RICHLAND, WASHINGTON, FEBRUARY 28-MARCH 1, 2018 Invited Presentations • Introductory Remarks on DOE-ORP, Jon Peschong, DOE-ORP Presentations by Washington River Protection System's Contractors • Introduction, Jason Vitali • Hanford Low-Activity Waste Historical Overview, Dave Swanberg • System Plan 8 Baseline Case SLAW Sizing, Jeremy Belsher • History of Supplemental LAW Treatment Reviews, Dave Swanberg • History of Supplemental LAW Cost Comparison, Dave Swanberg • Advanced Glass Program, John Vienna 49
Read the entire page →
From page 50...
... Public Comments • Paul Flaherty, CHC Consulting, LLC, who made an oral presentation and submitted a written comment on behalf of Knauf Insulation • Vince Panesko, Retired from the Hanford Site • Don Alexander, Retired from DOE Submitted Written Comments at the Public Meeting • John Vienna, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory • John Williford, Chrysalis Technology Group, Ltd. • Tom Carpenter, Hanford Challenge Submitted Written Comments to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine • Darryl Siemer, a consulting scientist who is retired from the Idaho National Laboratory, submitted a number of comments via e-mail 50
Read the entire page →
From page 51...
... • Analysis Results, Sharon Robinson (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) • Summary, Bill Bates Stakeholder Presentation • Alfrieda Peters, Yakama Nation Public Comment • Mark Hall, Hanford Solutions and a former DOE employee Submitted Written Comment to the National Academies • Tom Galioto, long-term Tri-Cities resident, a former Hanford employee, and a current member of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB)
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • northwest national
  • michael stone
  • bill bates
  • dave swanberg
  • idaho national

  • submitted written
  • washington state
  • sandia national
  • steam reforming
  • thomas brouns

  • feed vector
  • preliminary trls
  • george guthrie
  • supplemental law
  • alex smith

  • waste forms
  • written comments
  • river national
  • don alexander
  • government accountability

  • law treatment
  • paul shoemaker
  • hanford solutions
  • robert alvarez
  • glass program

  • susan leckband
  • manager wtp
  • analysis approach
  • concerning cleanup
  • agency regional


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.