Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 Connection Between Health Equity and History, Federal Policy, and Data
Pages 77-132

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 77...
... GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURES AND POWER This section provides a brief overview of federalism and available policy levers and the unique governing aspects for American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) people.
From page 78...
... EOs can advance and contribute to health equity. For example, EO 139851 Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government is focused on advancing equity.
From page 79...
... For example, it informed Supreme Court attitudes toward slavery as a state right. In Dred Scott v.
From page 80...
... . Federal civil rights law provides a set of minimum standards on which states can build by enacting further protections (Pepin and Weber, 2019)
From page 81...
... . ACA's Medicaid expansion was also challenged in court, and the Supreme Court found that although the federal government could withhold new funds for that expansion, it could not take away existing Medicaid funds (Cornell Law School, n.d.-a)
From page 82...
... .  10 The Code of Federal Regulations Title 25 contains the codified federal laws and regu lations that are in effect as of the date of the publication pertaining to American Indians (Native Americans)
From page 83...
... This is important to understand as policy makers contemplate the contribution of federal policies to health inequities. "Invasion is a structure not an event" (Wolfe, 1999, p.
From page 84...
... Historical trauma (trauma persisting from previous generations) coupled with some of the highest contemporaneous traumas for AIAN people have resulted in substantial health inequities (see Chapter 7)
From page 85...
... federal law and do not have self-governance rights. Some have engaged in a movement to have their status as Native people revived (though not all Native Hawaiians agree this is the best path -- some argue for complete independence from the United States, federal recognition and Indigenous status, or more control over Native Hawaiian assets, such as crown and ceded lands)
From page 86...
... Not all policies are designed to address health inequities -- a policy or program could be simply neutral. In addition, most policies do not intend to increase inequities; it is an unanticipated outcome.
From page 87...
... . Racism systematically excludes, Black, AIAN, Latino/a, and other targeted people from power, status, and other social, economic, and political resources and opportunities, which contributes to health inequities (Baah et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2019)
From page 88...
... . Theory and empirical research suggest that these historical and contemporary federal and state laws disadvantage people from minoritized groups shape racial and ethnic health inequities through various social, economic, physical, and psychological mechanisms into lowquality neighborhoods, schools, and jobs and other circumstances, including chronic and acute psychosocial stressors (Bailey et al., 2017;
From page 89...
... . STATE OF HEALTH INEQUITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Despite data gaps that prevent accurate and full documentation of health and well-being for many racially and ethnically minoritized populations, data that are available suggest persistent and sometimes growing health inequities.
From page 90...
... Racial, ethnic, and tribal health inequities take on many forms, such as higher rates of chronic disease and premature death. Despite progress to narrow the gaps in some racial, ethnic, and tribal health outcomes, there are still ongoing and persistent inequities tied to the social and structural determinants of health.
From page 91...
... . This heterogeneity applies to other population groups as well (e.g., the AIAN, Black, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander [NHPI]
From page 92...
... examined years of potential life lost by race and ethnicity in Washington State and found that relative to non-Hispanic White people, non-Hispanic Black, AIAN, Asian or other Pacific Islander, multiracial, and Hispanic decedents had significantly higher rates. Disparities were reduced, but not eliminated, when controlling for sociodemographic factors, and controlling for place-based risk factors did not further lessen differences.
From page 93...
... FIGURE 2-2  Pregnancy-related mortality ratio (per 100,000 births) by race and ethnicity 2017–2019.
From page 94...
... . Racially and ethnically minoritized people are more likely to experience certain birth risks and adverse birth outcomes compared to White people.
From page 95...
... NOTES: AIAN = American Indian or Alaska Native. Persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race but are categorized as Hispanic for this analysis; other groups are non-Hispanic.
From page 96...
... . A study found that African American children had the highest prevalence of risk factors, whereas Asian children had the lowest (the sample size for Pacific Islander children was too small, so their data were not included in this study)
From page 97...
... . Several studies and papers find that these inequities are not fully explained by socioeconomic status, and several studies point to structural racism as a contributor (Churchwell et al., 2020; Javed et al., 2022; Mazimba and Peterson, 2021)
From page 98...
... . Black, Hispanic, and AIAN people make up disproportionate shares of SSI enrollees compared to White people (Musumeci and Orgera, 2021)
From page 99...
... . Furthermore, much of the discussion surrounding racial and ethnic health inequities mirrors that on the effect of sex/gender on health outcomes, including the importance of research that distinguishes between females and women from males and men, the historical role and power dynamics between men and women, and the role of policy across the same multiple domains that impact health outcomes.
From page 100...
... Given the co-occurrence and mutual reinforcement of these three factors, racially and ethnically minoritized LGBTQ+ people often experience greater health inequities than their heterosexual and White counterparts (Hatzenbuehler et al., 2013; IOM, 2011; NASEM, 2020b) , which plays out in sexual and reproductive health.
From page 101...
... . Passing, implementing, and enforcing laws and policies that prevent discrimination and advance equity are necessary, but LGBTQ+ racially and ethnically minoritized communities have many strengths that can be leveraged to advance health equity.
From page 102...
... . Rurality is a strong predictor of poor health outcomes and health inequities (James et al., 2017)
From page 103...
... citizenship status, immigration status also plays a powerful role in limiting access to federal programs that can address key SDOH and increasing risks to immigration enforcement actions that may more directly impact health status (NASEM, 2015, 2018b)
From page 104...
... Not all federal agencies collect and report high-quality and accurate data on these minimum racial, ethnic, and tribal population categories, which is a significant barrier to achieving data equity. This lack of data also contributes to health inequities, as policy decisions are not fully informed by the data.
From page 105...
... Update terminology deemed to be inaccurate or archaic, including removing "Negro" from the Black of African American definition; removing "Far East" from the Asian definition -- replacing with "East Asian"; removing the phrase "who maintain tribal affiliation or com munity attachment" in the AIAN definition; and removing "Other" in the Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander definition. The committee provides input on these proposed changes in Chapter 8.
From page 106...
... Accurate data are necessary to inform knowledge and action on racial and ethnic health inequities and their social determinants. The first major barrier is that data on OMB-defined historically underrepresented groups are not disaggregated (Panapasa et al., 2011)
From page 107...
... . In addition, adequate granular/detailed data are not collected on the minimum OMB categories (such as Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander)
From page 108...
... Moreover, health surveys and other federal data collection efforts tend to include only some of the measures needed for an intersectional analysis of racial and ethnic health inequities. For example, although the National Health Interview Survey, the nation's leading source of population health data from CDC, does collect information on sexual orientation identity, it does not include other measures of sexual orientation (e.g., sexual behavior)
From page 109...
... Collecting tribal affiliation is more appropriate, as it does not denote tribal citizenship and is cognizant of the historical context of disenrollment, descendants, and federal initiatives that separated AIAN people from their communities; however, it must be respectful of AIAN data sovereignty (Urban Indian Health Institute, 2020)
From page 110...
... In particular, national health surveys and other federal research efforts (e.g., clinical trials -- see Chapter 5) fail to include measures of historical and contemporary structural, institutional, community, and interpersonal racism and xenophobia, which shape racial and ethnic health inequities (Brown and Homan, 2023)
From page 111...
... . This undermines the ability of policy makers, researchers, and program officials to identify how historical and contemporary structural and social inequities shape racial and ethnic health inequities and, in turn, thwart action on these root causes at the federal, state, territorial, tribal, and local levels (Rodríguez, 2021)
From page 112...
... . To benefit Black, AIAN, NHPI, and other minoritized communities and advance health equity, race and ethnicity data collection efforts have to explicitly inform the equitable allocation of health-promoting resources to underresourced communities through laws, policies, programs, and community efforts.
From page 113...
... In addition, the data can be used for multiple purposes: provider payment (see Chapter 5 discussion on value-based payment) , a primary source for clinical trials and health services research, quality improvement initiatives, and incentives to improve individual behaviors.
From page 114...
... ,28 the national organization that promulgates recommendations on clinical preventive services, has launched an initiative to address structural racism that can serve as a model for other regulatory agencies. Given the intrinsic deficiencies in representation of racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials (see Chapter 5)
From page 115...
... This includes measures to identify and track strategies to demonstrate progress in addressing health inequities regarding clinical preventive services.
From page 116...
... In addition, the Equitable Data Working Group (established under EO 13985) studies and provides recommendations to the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy to identify inadequacies "in existing Federal data collection programs, policies, and infrastructure across agencies, and strategies for addressing any deficiencies identified" and "support agencies in implementing actions, consistent with applicable law and privacy interests, that expand and refine the data available to the federal government to measure equity and capture the diversity of the American people" (The White House, 2021)
From page 117...
... . Given a delay of more than 2 years in the release of detailed-origin population counts from the 2020 census, community organizations have pushed for timely dissemination as an important aspect of data equity (AAPI Data and National Council of Asian Pacific Americans, 2022)
From page 118...
... However, the chapter also shows the rich information that has been collected that points to the mechanisms for how the social and structural determinants of health have contributed to health inequities and are therefore key areas to focus federal action to advance health equity. Chapters 3–7 take deeper dives into SDOH and how they can positively and negatively impact health equity via federal policies: economic stability, education access and quality, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and the social and community context.
From page 119...
... 2021. Developing a database of structural racism–related state laws for health equity research and practice in the United States.
From page 120...
... 2020. Cardiovascular health in American Indians and Alaska Natives: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
From page 121...
... 2020. Call to action: Structural racism as a fundamental driver of health disparities: A presidential advisory from the American Heart Association.
From page 122...
... 2019. Trends in clinical research including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander participants funded by the U.S.
From page 123...
... 2011. Structural racism and health inequities.
From page 124...
... 2014. Systematic review of health disparities for cardiovas cular diseases and associated factors among American Indian and Alaska Native popula tions.
From page 125...
... https://www. governing.com/now/how-american-style-federalism-is-dangerous-to-our-health (accessed March 11, 2023)
From page 126...
... 2014. Structural racism and myocardial infarction in the United States.
From page 127...
... 2022. Trends in collection of disaggregated Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander data: Opportunities in federal health surveys.
From page 128...
... 2011. Efficacy of federal data: Revised Office of Management and Budget standard for Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders examined.
From page 129...
... 2022. Measuring structural racism and its association with racial disparities in firearm homicide.
From page 130...
... 2015. Joint effects of structural racism and income inequality on small-for-gestational-age birth.
From page 131...
... 2017. The Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander national health inter view survey: Data collection in small populations.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.