Physician Perspectives and Workforce Implications Following the Repeal of Roe v. Wade Proceedings of a Workshop–in Brief (2023) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Physician Perspectives and Workforce Implications Following the Repeal of Roe v. Wade: Proceedings of a Workshop - in Brief
Physician Perspectives and Workforce Implications Following the Repeal of Roe v. Wade: Proceedings of a Workshop - in Brief
Pages 1-5
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 1... ...
Reproductive Health, Equity, and Society held a virtual public workshop to consider the current impacts of CHANGES IN EXPERIENCES PRACTICING SINCE OVERTURN OF ROE V WADE the Dobbs ruling on practicing physicians and potential Victor J
|
From page 2... ...
-- who currently practices in Seattle, Washington, but explained that she would be providing IMPACTS ON FIELDS BEYOND OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY perspectives from her time at an academic institution in Brindis noted that much of the attention surrounding Tennessee -- described how, following the Dobbs ruling, the impacts of the Dobbs decision has been focused on she was unsure how to counsel patients because the the obstetrics and gynecology fields, but that many of implications for medical practice in Tennessee were the changes in state laws related to abortion care and the unclear as was the timeline for when changes would go challenges navigating those changes are also relevant into effect. Possible legal risks and penalties were also to other areas of medicine -- cardiology, for example -- unclear, adding further complexity and uncertainty.
|
From page 3... ...
Department of Health and Human Services to reaffirm that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act Thompson emphasized that the taskforce, known as a (EMTALA) requires emergency medicine departments committee at her Tennessee institution, was actually in to stabilize patients even if the treatment includes place before the Dobbs ruling, so its operations had been abortion care.
|
From page 4... ...
Verma responded that any kind of legislative provided an overview of the trends and potential effects interference affects the ability to provide timely care, of the Dobbs ruling on the physician workforce. Resneck explaining that she may not be allowed to provide care in said that state laws restricting access to abortion care certain situations because the patient's condition is not have put physicians in an "impossible position" because considered serious enough, but that it can develop into they are attempting to provide care and comply with a more complicated and dangerous situation.
|
From page 5... ...
Brierley, Brierley Consultancy, LLC; Ned Calonge, Colorado School of Public Health; Judy Chang, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Ellen Wright Clayton, Vanderbilt University; Cat Dymond, Atlanta Birth Center; Michelle Bratcher Goodwin, Georgetown University Law Center; Barbara Grosz, Harvard University; Vincent Guilamo-Ramos, Duke University School of Nursing; Lisa Harris, University of Michigan; Paula Johnson, Wellesley College; Justin R Lappen, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; Monica McLemore, University of Washington Schools of Nursing and Public Health; Robert Moffitt, Johns Hopkins University; Rebecca R
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.