Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Pages 295-296

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 295...
... Such analytic techniques as systems analysis and decision theory appear to permit design approaches with those characteristics. Application of these analytic techniques requires, however, that each information-gathering or testing procedure be described quantitatively with respect to its ability to identify potentially toxic chemicals; and the current art of toxicity testing and priority-setting does not readily permit such quantitative descriptions with great precision.
From page 296...
... In the light of that impediment, the following may be considered as characteristics of a system that would advance the state of the art of priority-setting: · Use of explicit, detailed, and formal decision-making procedures in selecting and ranking chemicals for testing, such as are illustrated in the approach described in this report, which is based on principles of systems analysis and decision theory. · Validation and quantification of the performance characteristics of all tests and other information-gathering procedures used in the testing programe · Development of relevant data bases, including those related to the production and use of chemicals, to the potential for human exposure, to structure-activity relationships, and to toxic activity.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.