A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research (1997) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix D: Responses to Dear Colleague Letter
Appendix D: Responses to Dear Colleague Letter
Pages 119-120
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 119... ...
Total respondents (all grant recipients) BCRP study section members BCRP study section chairs Denied funding for at least one application Overwhelmingly positive Positive with suggestions for improvement Mostly negative, major criticisms No.
|
From page 120... ...
. su emission No mechanisms to resubmit or improve grants not funded Training grant applications should request and evaluate training environment, mentors, other key factors in training program Time from submission to notification about funding too long 46 8 3 3 Grants Management Annual report requirements too long, not well reviewed, 13 oversight too rigid Human volunteers regulations too burdensome No flexibility in spending across budget categories Peer/programmatic review Concerns about funding out of priority score order Lack of continuity in study section members 8 3 10 3
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.