Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

APPENDIX C: Survey Responses
Pages 1-76

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... G CSP EQUAL TRCOAT AL N Y GO TO HD,MG N R G ALWAY l l | WATER | 32 l l | REQ | S NG AZ SAME HD N G NG AR N MAKE HD MG SAME CP G ~ ALWAY EQUAL B2 S NG CA N Y ALREADY HD MG Y SAME CP G NG COMPLIAN B2 VIS T CT Y INT Y HD MG CP EI R CSP NG MEMBE B2 WHITE VIS R ONLY TOPCO CO Y Y _ B2 Y PRIME CP EI G NG ONLY DE Y Y MG SAME CP G A SAME FL CP EI _ VIS Existing Policy REP OC Z REP OC REP REP OC REP Z OCSP REP Z SPOC ZSPOC REP SP ZOC REP Z SPOC 1 .;
From page 2...
... | | ' 'OC | VOC Plan | :lolts | Box Girder :nteriors| Edges Painted System Why Prep Why GAN Y ALREADY HD N G CS NG | COMPLIAN | l l l l | En | Y l I ADDRESSE | | SAME | CP | G | A D IL N ' <340 G Y Y CPEI Y NG : 1 1 1 1 1 IVIS 1 1 IN N Y SHOP B2 N G A ONLY IA N USE MG B2 CP EI G NG | I WEA.ST SOLID | BORNE l l l l l KS N Y PRIMER HD MG Y EM = CP EI G CS NG ONLY B2 ZN VIS KY N Y <350 MG,B1 IZ CP R,G A CS E l l I NG LA Y INT <350 B2 N N A | R ONLY l l l l l l l MA N Y NO PROB HD MG Y CP EI G CS l l l l I | | VIS | I WELDI MD N <350 B EXr CP EI R G NG VIS Existing Policy z SPOC REP SP z REP Z SP OC REP SP ZOC REP OC REP Z OC SCOP REP SP OC REP Z OC 2
From page 3...
... | All | lOC | VOC Plan | 301ts | Box Girder Interiors | Edges Shop Limits Painted System ~ Why ~ Prep ~ Why ME | Y | ~| | ID MG | Y EXI ~| CP | R | A NG | | 3 | | WHITE I l Ml | Y | r | SAME l l EXI | CP El | R | CS NG MN | N | r | MEET~ \1GZn T Y | IZ | CPEI T R MO N r WILLBE GB2 Y IZ CPEI G NG | COMPL OR | l l | ANPOPTLY l l l l l l MT N WEA ST TYPE 3 PRIME CP VIS R NG NC | Y l| <350 | HD | Y | EXI' | CP VIS | R G NG ND | Y l | CHANGE | HD MG | Y | Y | CP | G C5 NG NE | N l | CURRENT | B | N l l | R G | NG NH | Y l | <350 | MG B2 Y EXT ~ CP El j G NJ Y Y CHANGE HD MG Y EXT CP VIS G A l l | MHARNU F | B2 | | WHITE | NM | N |, | EMQAUAEL | B2 | Y | SAME | CP | R NV l N | B2 | Y | SAME | CP | R | ALWAY NY | Y l | <350 | Bl | Y | | CP | N | ALWAY | Existing Policy REP SP OC REP REP SP ZOC REP SP ZOC REP SP REP OC z REP OC OC REP OC Z REP OC SPZ OC 3
From page 4...
... MG T N l l | G | CS SC | N 1 ~| CHANGE l l l l | | S CSP SD Y Y NOT G CSP ADDRESSE D TN MAY Y <340 MG B2 SAME CP G ALWAY S TX UT NO PLAN B2 PRIME CP R,G CSP NG VA N Y MAKE HD.MG PRIME EI G NG COMP B2 R/ TCOAT VE Y Y HD MG NO USE R ALWAY SNG WA N Y B2 EXT CP EI R NG WHITE VIS Wl | Y | Y | MEET | HDB | DONT 1 | | G T CSPNG Existing Policy REP MOST Z LITTLE REP Z SPOC REP Z SPOC REP OC REP SPOC REP SP ZOC REP Z SP OC REP REP Z SPOC REP OC OC REP SP 4
From page 5...
... G | INC NB | N | | N/A | HD B2 | Y PRIME | CP | R G ONT | Y l | N/A | HD | N | | N I _ NF I r | NO PLAN | HGMG | N I T | G NS l l l l l l l l l SAS N N NO USE G NG Existing Policy REP Z SPOC OC REP OC SPZ REP Z SPOC REP Z SPOC REP SP OCZ REP REP OC Bl=Black with tolaant pnmer, B2=Black wl~ system pnmer, EM - oxy mastic 5
From page 6...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continuec! Synthesis 257 su~vey responses Paint-Nev' (Table A)
From page 7...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Paint-New (Table A) | Paint-Existing Type VOC | Appi | Prep Slip | Spec | Costs ~ Typ ~| VOC | Appl | Prep | Spec ID I IL I M300/ <340 1 S I SP10 B I STATE I 1.50 ~1 1 1 SP10 I I WBA/WBA l l l | | SP | SP3 | IN | IZNN | | PWAS l | 2.50 | REP IZNN | SP2 HL&AS l I I OC ~ ~aSulfonate 1 l | | T ~l l l l l | IA | IZ/WBA <350 | S | SP10 | B | AL T I R 1 350 | S
From page 8...
... l l l l l | SUR TOL.EP/WBEP l l l l NC WBAIWBA/ <240 S SP6 N/A STATE REP WBA/WBA/WBA <240 S B R SP6 STATE | | WBA l l l | | Z Ot ALKYDJALKYD | <350 | | SP3 l l l l l l l | OR iBA l l l l | ND T WPU/PU | MR | SP10 | - T STATE | T REP WPU/PU 1 | MR | SP6 | STATE | OC. EM/PU l l l l NE | IZ/WBAOR <360 | MR | SP10 N/A | STATE | | PP/( XPRIMER/WBA <360 | SP2 | STATE PU l l l l I I EPI {IMER/MCU NH IZ OR <420 MR SP10 B M300 OR REP ZNMCU/MMCU/ SP6 OZ/EP/PU NEPCOAT MMCU SP2 OR 3 MCU/MMCU/MMCU SP11 OR 6 NJ IZ/EP/PU MR SP10 B STATE 2.00 OZ/EP/PU <500 P MR SP10 NM I SP l l SP10 | UP | STATE | 3-4 | PU EM/PU SNPOT | S SP6 l NV | IZ/EP/PU <420 | S 1 SP10 l l l | EM M/PU | SANDBLA | | OH l l l l l l l l l l Costs 8
From page 9...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses r Paint-New (Table A)
From page 10...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, conDnued Synthesis 257 survey responses Paint - New (Table A) Paint - Existing [ | Type VOC ~ Appl ~ Prep Slip ~ Spec ~ Costs | Type ~ VOC ~ Appl ~ Prep ~ Spec Wl | iZ/EP/PU NO | MR | SP10 B | STATE | | OZ/E P/PU | <420 | MR | SP10 | STATE LIMIT l l l l l l l l l l WV | IZ/VAR NO | PA I | SP10 B | STATE | | REP ~Z/EM | NO | PAI | SP6 | STATE L I LIMIT l l l l l I I LIMIT I l l l l l l I | OC( SUFORPP | NO | PAI | SP2 | STATE ALB | WS l l l | | OC AMCUCA SULFONATE WBA BC | IZ/EP/PU l l l | | SEV OZ/EP/PU ~UF ~ IZ/EM M | S SPI0 ~ZP~EPIZ/EM/EM EM TIE MATCH ONT | OZ/VN N/A | MR | SP10 | AGENC | 51.50/S | RE OZ/VIV N/A | N/A SP6 | AGENCY | | M | SP ~ EM/AEM , NF | IZ/PUIPU | MR | SP10 l | AGENC' | NS SAS | MCU/MCU/ | MCU MB Costs 1 13.64/sm PROV FORC $5.00 10
From page 11...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Z=zinc; MCU-moisture cure urethane; PU=polyurethane; IZ=inorganic zinc; OZ=organic zinc; A -- aluminum; EM= epoxy mastic; WP=watff, E~epoxy; WBA=water home acrylic; WBVA= watt home vinyl acrylic;V=vinyl; 11
From page 12...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Metallizing (Section I B) | Yes | Shop~ eld | Current | Areas | N~unber | Service | Type | Prep | Spray | Coated | Spec | Repair AK | N AL | N l l l l l l l l l l l AZ | N l l l l l l l l l I I _ CA | N I ~l l l l l l l I _ CT Y SIF Y BEAR 10 9 Zn,8-10 SP5 SP10 FLAME S LATEX AGENCY TOUCH l l l | G/B N&E l | | ~MIIL0 M ~| | EARC | S/P PP/PI I AWS | TUCPOOAF1 CO | N l l l l l l l l l l | _ DE | N l l l l l l l l l l I _ [D ~ N ~_ IL | N l l l l l l l l l I I _ Y F Y BEAR NEW Zr , 3 SP5 ELECT S P MAN REC I I I T l l | MIL | | ARC l l l IA | N l I ~l l l l l l l I _ KS | N l l l l I 1 l l l l I _ KY | N l I r l l l l l l I I LA | N l l l l l l l l l I I _ MD | N l | TEST SE( T l l | | MIL | | FLAME | SEPOX P | I _ MA | N l l l l l l l l l I I _ ME | Y | S l | BEAR | O | 7+ | Zn,8MIL | AW5 | MR | SPHEN' iLIC | ZN RICH | AWS Cost F 16.95 SqFt 35.00 50/B EAR 12
From page 13...
... NCHRP Web Document 1 l, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses Metallizing (Section I B)
From page 14...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continuect Synthesis 257 survey responses Metallizing (Section I B) I T | Cun ent | Areas | Number | Service| Type | Prep | Spray | Coated | Spec | Repair VE N S Y BEAR O OZn, 6 MIL SP5 SP10 FL ZnCr or AGENCY Zn EXPA DEV MANUF REC AWS PAINT WA IN I l T 1 T 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wl | N l l l l l l l l l | | WV | Y | S l | POT BEAR | 0 | IN PROG l l l l | AWS ALB | Y | SF | BEAR l | =tSYRS | Zn7MtL | SP5 | NOT S | ASWCY S | METALLIZE | l l l I 101NTS l l | | ORP | GIS9 | GALCACON | _ BC Y F Y BEAR UNK >10 YRS Zn Zn/AI SP5 FL P EP/PU or V AGENCY RAILS PE!
From page 15...
... NCH~ ~b ~oc~e~ 11, co~i~ed S~s 257 ~ ~_~ ~^ I O ~1 ~m ~S-= ~mbin~on Fi@ld ~r Y O ~CF~LP~ ~5 ~S~6 I I 1 1 I'~G I 1 I Y ]
From page 16...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses [ Galvanizing (Section I C) [ | Yes ~ Cum ~t | Numbr | Service | Combinatio' | Field | Length | Re,oair ME INSERTS 55' COLD GALV L MN | Y | Y | 0 | 20+ | CF INSERT B | N || PAINT [ MO T T T | | CF | N 11 [MS T T l l l I 1T MT | N T 1 7 T 11 | NC | Y T 7 7 r |T Zn RICH l ND | NN l l l l l ll | NE | Y | Y l | | INSERTS | N | | Zn RICH [NH 7Y 1 7 7 1 1 1 T INI TN 1 7 7 1 I T I !
From page 17...
... EM ZRICH TOUCH UP r Yes | Oamnt | Number | Service ~ Combination Field LN l l l l l l BEAM 104' BEARINGS 40' ~1 1 1 1 1 1 Y | N | | CF INSERTS BS | N | 10 MET t I Y I NONE | 30-50 | RAILS | >N | 4U | Y | 100 | 15 | GIRDERS | Y | 6(y BEARINGS _ I Y 1 20 1 30 1 N 1 N 1 3o CF= Cross frames; BS = bearing steel; BWS = bearing weathering steel Repair I Cost _ wi WS WV WY ALB STATE GALVACON OR METAL NONE 0.40 BC PEI QUE YT NB ONT NF NS SAS MB NT UNK 0.25 GALV 0.75/ LB Wea~ering Steel (Section I D)
From page 18...
... | Use | Painted | Areas | FHWA | Number | No Perf Sat | Problems | No.Perf Unsat | Remedial Act | ALT T 1 w z I | | LL BUT I | RTM | I EXP.
From page 19...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses Weathenng Steel (Sff:tion I D)
From page 20...
... [ | | Painter | Areas | FHWA | N~unber | r o.PafSat | P~bl~ns | No.PerfUnsat | Remedial Act ALB UP 75 73 BC Y ~ Z UNK UNK UNK N P IZ/PU PEI = L QUE L YT NB I Y I P I W I 1 31 1 1 ] 1 R ~1 21 1 P~ ONT | Y | Y | Z | N | 20 | ' D | N NF = ~ ~=~= Mo~torium N N N N N 20
From page 21...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses Powder Coating (Section I E)
From page 22...
... N ClIFUP TVeb Ijocu~nen~ ll~conIi ~ cd Syntbesk 257 survey responses tang (Soon I ~ ~_1 ~ ormolu- ~ of ~1 ~at Time ~ Fig n1 lamI- 1 1 1 I I I N H0N ~S .
From page 23...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Powder Coating (Section I E) Time to First | | Use | Current | Type of member | Type oPpowder | Thickness | Rcpair | Ma~r~t N l | N l l l l l l NB N ONT N NF N I NS~T OF= ~I Cost 23
From page 24...
... NCH~ Weh ~oc~e~ 1 1, co~ed Sy~es~ 237 s~ey ~onses ~n~ (S-on F) ~I ~@ ~mbin~on I S-l Y Y T Y l G Y Y Y G P Y N G
From page 25...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Concrete (Section F) Use Prefer Alternate Combination Steel MN N G MO G P MS MT SITE SP P WS NC ND Y _ _ N P WS G NH N G NJ N G P NM NV N NY y <100 OH Y SPAN L G P WS M OK .
From page 26...
... NCH~ Mob Pocket 1 1, coated Sots 257 ~ ~ and (S-on F) P^ ~_- ~mbln~on S-1 .
From page 27...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Expected Life Section G) Paint New Repaint AK 25 yr 25 yr AL 25Y 15-20 AZ 30 30 AR CA 20 20 CT 25 25 CO DE 20-25 20-25 FL 15-20 15-20 GA 20 20 HI 15 10 ID IL 20 20 1N 15 Y 10Y KS 30 20 KY LA 2~25 20-25 MD 15-20 Y 12-15 MA 20 Y | Metai | Galv | Wr~ering | Powder | Conuetc | Determine T 1 1 1 7 25 yr 1 75 1 N 1 1 75yr 1 POLICY 75 | 75 1 1 75 1 COST COMP | 50 1 1 1 50 1 POLICY 1 1 1 1 1 20 POLICY 50 N 50 60 50 POL & DESIGNER POLICY 75 75 POLICY 20 60 50 POLICY 25 Y 50 Y 50 Y N 50 Y DESIGNER ~POLICY 20 50 20 50 POLICY POLICY 15 N BR PT TEAM POLICY Maintenance Costs Overcoat 25yr 10-15 N Y Y 5 1~12 10 10 10 Y y 10 5+ 5-10 M y y y y y y Y CONC SHORT SPAN LONG -- WS y y CONC IF POSS 27
From page 28...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses Expected Life Section G3 20 1S 20 8+ 15 8 10 lO-15 5-7 15 NOT YET 20 10 Paint New | Repaint ME 70 Y | 15 Y MI 45 Y | 30 Y MN 25 Y | 15 Y MO 15 l 15 MS 1 MT ~ 50 1 50 NC 30 25 ND 30 20 NE `10 30 NH 25+ 20+ NJ 25 20 NM 25 NV 50 N 25 UNK NY 20 OH 20 Y 15N OK 30Y 20Y OR 25-50 Y 25-50 PA ~ 20-25 15+ RI 20 Y 20 NOT YET SC 20 12 3~35SD 20 20 TN 20-25 20 TX 20 N 20 N | Metal | Galv | V eathering | Powder | Connete | Detennine T30 T30 13~: 1 Tso 1 15 Y 50 POL & DES 15 Y 30 Y 30 Y 75 N 75 Y POLICY 8 60 60 POL & DES 75 75 POLICY 30 40 75 25 75 DESIGNER 5 ~ 1 1 30 1 POLICY 50 50 50 BOTH ST AND CONC ALT 30 POLICY 40 .
From page 29...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continues! Synthesis 257 survey responses Expecied Life Section G)
From page 30...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses QA/QC Section [1, Question 1-14) | Accept | ~ C | Cert | PU ,ISHED | Proficienc | lAs | New | hnpact | QA | hnsp Cont | SSPC Inter~st | Partnering L I I I I Iytest I I I I I I I | AK | TCCTR | I SUAL | ACT.LAB | N | N | N | SPEC Y FOR | N N | Y L I I | RESULT I I I I | | n | ENFORCE ACCEPT | | AL | C AL l | _ | N | N | IA | N | | Al | VIS INSP SP N | N | NOT l l l l l l l l l | ENF I I FORM, | AZ | CTR l l l l l | Y | Y l 11 | SPEC ENF QCQA | N N | Y | AR | TALCTRC | I iSUAL | AL | Y | Y | CA | T,AL | I tSUAL l | N | | Y | | Al I TEST l l | CT | AL,CTR | I IOQC | NEPCOAT | N l | N | Y | | Alll | SPECENF QC | Y Y | Y [ CO | C,AL l | N | N= | N | N | | Al | SPEC ENF TO QA | N N | Y | DE T TCAL | I ISUAL | VARIES T N | N T I | | NONE T SPECENF N | Y Y l FL T,C, USUAL USU Y Y Y N Al II SPEC ENF N Y Y Y l | CTR,AL l l l l l l l l l l l | GA l A,LC, | ISUAL | USUAL | Y l | Y | Y | N | Al | N | Y Y | N Hl | C | ONE | NOT SP | N | Y | N | Y | MUST | OTHER | SPEC ENF TO | Y | Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IL T,C, USUAL PERF N Y Y N AI QA QA N N Y l | CTR l l l l l l l l l l | | | IN | T C AL CTR l l | N l | N l | | Al | SPEC ENF | Y | Y | IA CTR, C VARIES N N N Y N AI SPEC ENF N NY Y | AL l l l l l l l l l l | | KS T C AL USUAL N Y N N AI II SPEC ENF N N Advant Y y y MIX RES y y y y 30
From page 31...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses KY LA MD MA ME MI MN MO MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA Rl Accept T,C T,AL C CTR AL T C CTR AL CAL C CTR AL TCCTRAL TCCTRAL TC TAL C~ .
From page 32...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses QA/QC Section 11, Queshon 1-14)
From page 33...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses QA/QC - Environmental and Workff (Section II, Question 15-19) Environmental Woricer | None | Soil l Air | Water | Vsible | Coo~clor | Agency | Train Emissions Agency | TSP | PM10 AK FORMAL OSHA FORMAL OSHA OSHA NACE | TEt | TEt l AL Y Y OSHA AGENCY N/A [ AZ l | Y | Y l | Y | OSHA&SPEC | AGENCY&SPEC | OSH ~ AR CONT RESP FOR CONTR RESP AGENCY RESP MAINT PER REC.
From page 34...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, cont~nuect Synthesis 257 survey responses QA/QC - Environrnental and Worker (Section II, Question 15-19) i I Envl~onrnental | Worka None Soil Air Water Visible Contractor Agency Train.
From page 35...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses QA/QC - Environmental and Worker(Section II, Question 15-19) Environmental Workff | None | Soil |Air | Water | V sible | Contractor | Agency | Trai' Emissions Agffncy | TSP | PM10 l l l l l NY | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | SEP PAY rrEll | WRITTEN | LEA)
From page 36...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continucc! Synthesis 257 survey responses QA/QC ~ Envin~nrnental and Worker (Section 11 Question 15-19)
From page 37...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Funding (Section m) j ~ FHWA ~ Bonds ~ Special Use Taxes ~ Genend Fund ~ Capital Ouday ~ Privitization ~ Tolls ~ O AK VERY LlhIITED AZ Y Y AR Y Y CA | Y l | Y l | Y | | Y CT ~ ~ GAS TAX DE FL GA Y Y HI Y Y .
From page 38...
... NC~P Web Document ~1, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Funding (Section m) FHWA Bonds Special Use Taxes Gen~l Fund Capital Outlay Privitization TollsOther MO Y Y Y MS MT MAINT CONST = | =STAIE | STATE & NC Y ND NE NH | Y l | Y NV ~ Y ~ = ~= OH Y Y OK OR | Y _ ~1 ~ 1 1 1= TN Y YNEW Y MAIN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UT VA VE WA | Y l l l l 1 ~3 Const vs Maint y y y y N _ N N N N Y Y Y ISTEA Y Y Y Y Y N N 38
From page 39...
... NC~ Web Docker- 1 1, complied Sy~es~ 257 sat responses Funded (S=lon ~ 1 1- I ~ Use III ~ ~ ~ Y Y Y Y tin 1 1 1 1 I I I I BC Y Y 1 ~I I I I 1 I I I Q~ Y Y Y Y Y Y NS ~s~s 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 tam I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 tam 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 ~1 ~ .
From page 40...
... NC~ ~b ~oc~- 1 1, co~i~ed S~s 257 ~ ~ ~i~ Ch~a (~n ~lnd ~ndn_ ~CS ~ S1~1 W_~ Y Y Y I" IN I I I" 1" N N N N CA Y Y 1Y I IY I I- 1N CO Y N N Y Y N N Y N ~ 1 Y 1 Y I Y I I Y I _ Y Y Y Y N N Y N N KS Y Y N N KY Y Y Y Y N N LA Y Y N N N N ~ Y Y Y Y WS N N Y Y Y N N I Y I Y 1 ~I 1 B= ~T~ N ~ wo~s~ _~ BY A~Y F~ 40
From page 41...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses Design Criteria (Section W)
From page 42...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Design Criterla (Section IV) lointless Continuous LLCS Rep Steel Warranty T Current N | N ~ WA | Y l I T T I WV N WY .
From page 43...
... Maintenance ~pes (Section V 1~, 10) BMS Imple Irnped PM RM DF CDM REM REH PRM MM ~ - Y ~Y ~Y ~Y ~Y Y ~Y' CA ~ Y ~ Y ~ ~ Y Y ~ DE T N T N T LACK OF STAFF r | Y | Y T Y I T T I GA 1Y 1Y 1 1 1Y 7Y 1Y T 7Y I 1Y | N | N ~ ~ ~| N | N | Y | Y | N ~ N IL | Y | Y I I I | Y | Y | Y I _ T ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I N T N 1 N | N IA Y ~Y Y Y Y KS ~ N ~ N W9, 1 :=1 ~ MA | Y I 1 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MD I Y I Y I BSR ~LY I Y 1 Y I Y I Y I Y I Y I Y ME | Y | Y | 1 1 Y 1 Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y ~ Time l.5YR UNK IMMED AS FUNDS BECOME AVAIL.
From page 44...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Ml MN MO ND NE NH NJ N.M. NV NY OH OK OR PA RI _~ TN TX Impel Gail l leg DATA UNTO BASE FOR MORE ACCESS DATA COLL PONTIS NOT READY BUILDING DATA BASE .
From page 45...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance types (Section V 14, 10) | BMS | Irnpl' | lmped | PM | FtM | DF | CDM | I;tEM | REH | PltM | MM L VE | Y | Y l | | Y | Y | | N | N | N | N LWI IY IY I TY rY IY I 7 IY 1 IY LWA IY IY 7 T rY 1Y TY 7 I TY 7Y twv 1 1 7 TY rY 1Y IY IY IY IY 7Y WY | N I T T r 1 T T 1 1 7 ALB | Y | N T RESOURCES T r 1 T T 1 T 7 ~ BC | Y | N | UND DEV | PEI QUE I 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 ~ IYT I I 1 7 1 1 7 1 T I 1 1 !
From page 46...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Issues Section (Section V Question 11) Env Issues OSHA Funding Uncertainty High costs AK 1 1 1 AL I I I 2 AZ 1 1 3 AR 1 1 2 3 3 CA CT 1 1 2 2 1 CO .
From page 47...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Issue; Section (Section V ,Ouestion 11) Env Issues OSHA Funding Uncertainty High cost MN I I I 3 1 MO 1 2 1 3 1 MS l l l | | = MT NC 2 2 ND 2 2 2 NE NH NJ 1 1 NM 1 1 1 1 1 NV 1 2 3 2 NY 2 2 1 3 2 OH 2 2 2 OK*
From page 49...
... NCH~ Huh Docket 1 1, coated Sy~esk 257 sty rc~onses Ghan_= Few (~on ~ Moon 1~ ~1 ~Subs_ Ion Fl=ibiliV ~_mOndidon In_ Hand 1 2 ]
From page 50...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Factors (Section V, Question 12) ent type Subst te Confi tion Fl xibili T In n Condition Contarn l | | Cond | | e ty |e pomade l l MN 1 3 1 MO 1 1 3 1 2 MS MT 1 3 3 2 NC 1 1 3 .
From page 51...
... NCHRP Web Document 11, continuer! Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Factom (Section V, Question 12)
From page 52...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continued Synthesis 257 survey responses AK AL AR AS CA CN CO DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IO KS* KY LA MA MD ME MI Maintenance Mitigation Factors Section V, Question 13)
From page 53...
... NH Nl NM NV On PA RT .~r sn TN TX Ia VA VF WT WS wv Maintenance Mitigation Facton; Section V, Question 13) 1 1 l 2 2 2 2 Fmic~inn~ 53 l 2 2 _ 2 _ = _ l _ _ _ 3 2 Repaint vs Overcoat 1 1 1 Urgency _ 2 2 .
From page 54...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, continuer! Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Mitigation Factors Section V, Question 13)
From page 55...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ i, continuec! Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Policy (Section V, Question 1~21 Policy Replace vs Paint Zone & Spot Pt Need Priontization Waste Reduction Solid Hazardous AK N N N N AL REP OC N N AR N N AZ Y REP N Y AR AR N N CA CT AR AD CO YOC RN N N N N N DE Y OC N Y AR AD N N N RN FL REP OC N AR GA REP N N AR AD Y REP N Y AR N N ID IL OC AR AD IN OC REP N N AR AD IA N AR AD KS REP N N AR N Y Y KY N N AD AR N LA N N AR N N MA COMB N AD AR N MD N ~D DEP ON COST Y AR AD Y Y Y EVAL BENE Recyclable N PERMIT N N _ N Y Y Y N Y Y _ y y N y y 55
From page 56...
... NE 0C R N N AR N NH | N | Y | Y | N| Y| Y | Y Nl REP N N AD ARYY Y . NM OC N N N N NV N N ~ AD AR ~ NY OC REP N N AR ADYY Y ST REP ONPOTTION OH REP N N AR N OK N N AR N N N OR AR AD ENV Y SOME PA Y COMB Y ALT BID RARELY N RATED Y Y Y IN BSI Rl OC N AR N N SC REP N N N N Y SD ALL AR N N Recyclable N Y N Y N Y CONT OPT N N N y N y N y N y y Y Y 56
From page 58...
... NCHRP Web Document ~ I, cont~nued Synthesis 257 survey responses Maintenance Numbas (Section V, Ouestion 22-31) | Numba Steel | Number Lead | Bridge Budget | Painting | Estimat' iNeeds | Reconis | Adequate | Pn~dictive | Aspects ~ 1 1const IMaint I 1 1 I T I AKI 430 1 375 1 20M 1 .8M 1 50K I 50K I AS I Y T Y I N AL| 1327 | _ | 36M | 13.5 | 3M | UNK | AGBMS | Y | N | Y AZT | UNK | 30M 1 IM l l I T I AR 2140 1700 UP TO DIST 34 M PROJ CAl l l l l l I I _ CTT 2500 | 2000 1 6M 1 .9 M 7 .9M | 1 1 PONT 1 N 1 N co 1- I I I T I I I I I _ DE | 202 | 113 | 13M | NONE | 3M | OPTRHOER | | N I _ FL | _ | 85% l l | | PRO| N| N| Y 8M 8MAS PROY N N GA I 1800 | 1200 1 45M 1 20M T | 1 PONT 1 1 1 _ | 2 | 2 | 1.5M 250K l 100/c | 50K | PONTIS | NOT CEP IL 1 3679 7 2730 7 319M ~63M 1 2M 7 20M Ft IR IOYR | PONT 1 1 CAPPS 1 N IN | 2423 | 400 r 3.5M NONE l 0 | 520K | PROJ | OK | | N IA | 1331 | 28 T 32M ~1 | | PROJPONT | DEV | N | N KS | 965 | 505 T 10M ~| SM | PROJ | | N | N KY | 3000 | 2700 T VAR VAP' | UNK | UNK | N | N | N | N LA | 625 T 4oo T 100M | SM T 50M T N T I I MA MD 1300 1000 40M 11M 500K Z 8M PONTIS N Need N N 58
From page 59...
... ~Y ~N NM | 900 I 9S I 1 5M I l l l l l l NV 207 106 VAR VAR VAR NO ES PROJ N N Y NY 13521 4156 300M 20M ST FOR OTHER BMS GEN EXCEPT N PROPOSE l l l 60 MCONT l l | PROP | FOR EXIS nNG | | D OH 5571 2530 l59M 19 4M l5M BMS PROJ N OK 2237 1987 45M 1 7M 1 SM 48M PROJ PRIORTIZE BUT N N PONTIS NO OPT E l l l l | | DBASE l l l OR | 450 | 300 | 40M 10M | 3M | 68M | PONT | | Y | Y PA 8272 3600 300M 1 SM UNK UNK AGENCY FOR OLD STR N N l l l l | | PRO | DIFF TO ~RJFY Rl 1 438 1 95% 1 79M 1 1 1 PONTIS Need 59
From page 60...
... NC~ ~b Doc~e~ 1 1, co~i~cd Sy^sL 257 s~ey re~onses _~ I1 ~ ~ st ~1 Num~ ~1 1 ~nd~ | ~0m^ ~ 1 ~^ I I I .
From page 61...
... Delaware Takes priority Florida usually include painting with repair/construction contract Georgia | in house bms runs br mains ant Not inmate v ith other mains. ant Hawaii no comment Idaho Illinois I items ass.
From page 62...
... safety is top priority. but cyclical and preventative corrective work is highest planned work North Carolina | given top priority North Dakota not integrated Ohio | _ Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania called demand mains.
From page 63...
... lfs~r. in eggs involoved done as soon as possible Prince Edward Island l Ouebec Yukon Terntones New Brunswick funds are diverted from routine mains to do CBM Ontario Usu.
From page 64...
... PM act have low priority due to limited resow ces Massachusetts | - ~ Michigan | Spot painting of newly p unfed bndges(2-5) yt us to extend service life Minnesota | Work is done to minimize but rep;urs or to exh Id life of structure 64
From page 65...
... Missouri Have sp. crews that work statewide painting bridges Montana | n/a Nebraska Thru BMS recommendations are made for overlays, painting or repairs, done to prolong life of structure Nevada pm is mainly cleaning duties and minor erosion channel air New Jersey n/a New York pm mnsists of cyclical act, cleaning, painting, lute bearings, sealling PCC decks, filling cracks.
From page 66...
... British Columbia could be called routine mains done by main. contractors Prince Edward Island Quebec Yukon Tenritones l New Brunswick | washing of bridges and goosing of bearings Ontario prey.
From page 67...
... ser. Fife and life cycle cost Alaska remaining life, funding sources, cost comparison Arizona | If rehab = 6o3/o oPre~olacernent~ repl strongly or iidered Arkansas Amount of Federal participation California Cost, load capacity of st.
From page 68...
... Other factors incl lead paint removal, service life, lenght, location/site restraints Rhode Island South Dakota Safety coed. servicability, economics, funding available South Carolina Tennessee Cost effectiveness Texas Utah Gen.
From page 69...
... j Prince Edward Island l l Quebec Yukon Territories New Brunswick Cost, funds available, traffic,loads alignment, age and capacity Ontario Prepare life cycle to present value, Financial analysis for competitive options Newfoundland Rehab. 50% of repl Nova Scotia l l Saskatchewan Level of service.
From page 70...
... Impact of defer is considered. Delaware but only if repVrehab is upcoming Florida Georgia Hawaii n Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa n Kansas Kentucky Not a fommal policy funding based Louisiana Y money Maine Life cycle costs Maryland Limited funds and manpower cone.
From page 71...
... for near future New Jersey Cost and if future rehab/repl planned New York N May deferred because of priorites, lack of funds, but sch work but no formal policy New Hampshire Y Depends if on 10 yr plan and where New Mexico N North Carolina North Dakota Amount of funding available Ohio If other work is scheduled, such as 4 laning will delay br work until then. Oklahoma Defer paint if sch for repl within 10 years Oregon Cost Pennsylvania Y age condition, nut.
From page 72...
... Prince Edward Island Quebec Yukon Territories New Brunswick Y May be deferred to coincide with other maintenance activities. Ontario Y Avail.
From page 73...
... forges alone. Once identifiedd, scope is determined by const and design forces Delaware Florida Georgia | maj = modularjt repl.,deck repl.
From page 74...
... Alberta ~ $50000 cost incl rehab or repl as option British Columbia rel cost is sole diffbet major and minor rehab involves qtr. modification.
From page 75...
... memo r, jackingto rapt bearings. nailing is detened and minimal work done | Ontario | Maj work done under a capital program oontnu Routine main covered under main.
From page 76...
... Conclusions not reported Continuous ongoing performance panel testing of various materials Research analysis of plastic flame coat and metallizing underway Evaluating use of clear epoxy sealers for use on weathering steel to seal out moisture l Evaluation of multiple overcoat systems on poorly adhered existing paint Coating project to isolate galv. baseplates from caustic grouts Coatings are field tested prior to inclusion on approved list L ab evaluation of overcoat materials with test patches on bridges Kentucky Maryland Missouri New Hampshire Michigan New Jersey Norm Carolina North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Washington Virginia Alberta British Columbia Ontario 76


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.