Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

4 Plenary Discussion
Pages 37-44

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 37...
... Lieberman, Stanford University James Glimm, State University of New York, Stony Brook Daniel Gorenstein, Rutgers University 37
From page 39...
... There will always be a caveat concerning maintaining current conditions because we are all subject to the vagaries of the federal government, state governments, donors, and so forth. QUESTION: Is the declining pool of employables an argument for more money?
From page 40...
... Between the David report update and MS 2000, the mathematics community will be provided a great deal of information. It is up to us to use it as best we can, both for our own planning and for convincing others.
From page 41...
... QUESTION: Where can one get national data on teaching load, class size, travel support, levels of computer support, and levels of secretarial support for mathematics departments?
From page 42...
... Their fraction of the undergraduate students may be three or four times the national average for undergraduates as a fraction of the total student body of the university. Their total contribution to the national pool of mathematics majors is a respectable percentage.
From page 43...
... It depends on the resources one has. For example, at a liberal arts college where all teaching is done by faculty, it makes sense to teach calculus in small sections.
From page 44...
... Another aspect is that arts and letters is a separate college. Some of them are requiring mathematics for all graduates.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.