Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix B: List of Recommendations from Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs: The Department of Energy's Office of Science and Technology
Pages 52-54

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 52...
... KINGSBURY, Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, California GARETH THOMAS, University of California, Berkeley RECOMMENDATIONS Linkage of Peer Reviews to Management Decisions As part of the documentation provided to peer review program management during the process of selecting projects for review, OST program managers should be required to clearly identify the upcoming decision or milestone for which the results of the peer review will be used.
From page 53...
... Addressing the Backlog of Peer Reviews OST should consider adopting a triage approach that would allow far greater numbers of technologies to be peer reviewed. This approach would involve a formal prescreening of projects by peer reviewers based exclusively on the written documentation on the project in effect, a "mail review" of projects, followed by a formal meeting of the panel to discuss and rank them.
From page 54...
... . Evaluation and Improvement Mechanisms OST management should develop an effective evaluation and improvement process for the peer review program that includes regular benchmarking against other peer review programs and the collection of activity and performance metrics.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.