Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

III. Biochemistry Programs
Pages 35-58

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 35...
... Fourteen programs were initiated since 1970, and each of 10 universities -- Boston University, University of California {San Diego) , Harvard University, University of Kansas, Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, University of Pittsburgh, SUNY at Buffalo, West Virginia University, and University of Wisconsin (Madison)
From page 36...
... For measures 04-07, which pertain to characteristics of the program graduates, data are presented for only approximately two-thirds of the programs; the other third had too few graduates on which to base statistics.4 For measure 12, a composite index of the size of a university library, data are available for 88 programs; for measure 14, the total university expenditures for research in the biological sciences, data are available for 104 programs. The programs not evaluated on measures 12 and 14 are typically smaller -- in terms of faculty size and graduate student enrollment -- than other biochemistry programs.
From page 37...
... Although in both figures there is a significant positive correlation between program size and reputational rating, it is quite apparent that some of the smaller programs received high mean ratings and that some of the larger programs received low mean ratings. Table 3.4 describes the 234 faculty members who participated in the evaluation of biochemistry programs.
From page 38...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.
From page 39...
... 90 .14 .10 .13 .07 50 49 16 .16 NA 42 42 177 59 63 128 54 51 14 41 42 13 41 .77 14051 174 56 59 59 .61 NA NA 49 .51 NA 45 1.0 0 5487 67 45 .75 NA 56 .00 NA 22 .54 NA 46 1.00 18977 67 66 .73 18053 54 65 .62 6547 80 49 4 7 49 .84 15581 344 60 61 78 .89 6232 71 62 47 48 .69 8706 217 53 50 64 .83 8706 217 59 50 64 NA .12 .08 .11 .11 .10 .11 . 2 3 NA NA .20 NA .12 .08 .13 .09 .13 .12 .08 .0 6 .12 .13 .29 .24 .15 .10 .07 .0 5 .05 .07 .06 .05 NA .12 .11 .12 .06 .04 .07 .08 .06 .06 .11 .07 NA .06 .11 .06 .08 .06 .09 .07 .08 .07 .09 .0 6 .11 .07 .08 .0 6 .07 .06 .13 .11 .14 .07 .08 .06 .08 .07 .08 .06 .08 .07 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 40...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.
From page 41...
... 2.5 1.7 1.1 0.5 0.4 .88 10714 109 .15 .13 .07 .09 48 50 48 47 53 61 54 52 49 040. 4.9 2.7 1.1 1.8 3.0 1.00 34979 224 .04 .06 .06 .05 74 71 50 76 78 6 7 91 65 6 7 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 42...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 43...
... 1.8 1.2 1.2 0.4 NA .25 NA 32 .15 .12 .20 .06 41 40 52 43 33 43 44 060. 1.4 1.0 NA 0.2 NA .00 NA 15 .16 .14 NA .05 36 35 39 22 41 42 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 44...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 45...
... (16) 65 47 47 27 43 42 300 73 73 64 47 47 29 43 43 73 48 48 153 57 53 126 54 55 250 68 63 NA NA 44 41 46 43 51 44 51 41 41 42 Survey Ratings Standard Error ._ (08)
From page 46...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 47...
... (11) .10 .06 NA .07 09 .06 .10 .07 .09 .07 .12 .07 09 .08 .07 .07 ·09 .08 .17 .06 .08 .07 .07 .07 .14 .13 .14 .07 .11 .10 .13 .07 tog .07 .11 .08 .09 .05 .10 .07 .17 .19 NA .05 .10 .08 .09 .07 .11 .09 .11 .06 .06 .07 .07 .06 .12 .08 .08 .07 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 48...
... 6 41 6 41 14 45 24 .94 49 67 6 NA 41 13 44 27 .95 51 67 10 .33 43 45 11 NA 43 20 47 .30 7. 44 NA NA .15 6.0 38 50 NA NA .27 6.6 43 40 .24 6.6 41 41 NA NA NA NA 5.5 57 NA 5.7 54 54 NA NA 5.7 54 5.2 61 NA 33 .59 5.8 54 53 .12 6.0 37 50 .35 5.2 46 62 .23 6.3 41 46 NA NA NA NA .75 .58 45 51 NA NA .77 .68 47 59 .87 .67 55 57 NA NA NA NA .88 .56 55 50 NA NA 1.00 .62 66 54 NA NA .95 .67 62 57 .83 .67 52 57 NA NA .83 .58 52 51 1.00 66 .73 .35 44 34 .74 .63 44 55 .77 .55 47 49 NA NA NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 49...
... (14) NA -1 .0 39 0.3 51 0.3 51 —0.6 42 NA NA NA NA 0.4 52 —0.2 46 2.0 68 -0.3 45 —0.4 44 NA —0.4 44 —0.5 44 NA 1.6 64 NA .55 NA 46 NA NA 34 44 56 46 .0 0 6799 40 22 4 7 44 .48 6799 61 43 47 47 .77 5802 104 56 46 51 NA NA .53 3077 46 42 .63 3674 50 43 .50 NA 44 41 59 46 67 47 41 .89 2405 80 62 41 49 2 40 290 72 29 43 77 48 59 46 26 43 70 48 NA 98 51 NA NA NA .8 5 12514 60 56 NA NA .67 6914 52 48 .31 2127 35 40 NA NA .39 3199 39 42 .53 4151 46 43 .70 5757 53 46 .70 6064 53 46 44 Published Survey Ratings Articles Standard Error (15)
From page 50...
... NA NA NA NA 6.3 .75 46 45 NA 5.3 1.00 60 66 NA NA NA NA .80 49 .84 53 .69 40 NA NA 5.7 .85 54 54 .67 38 NA (07) NA NA NA NA 70 60 NA 70 60 NA NA NA 30 31 63 55 54 48 NA NA 64 56 50 45 NA 61 55 51 54 .83 51 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 52...
... 52 TABLE 3 ~ 2 Summary Statistics Describing Each Program Measure -- Biochemistry Number of Programs Measure Evaluated Program Size 01 Raw Value 139 Std Value 139 02 Raw Value 136 Std Value 136 03 Raw Value 136 Std Value 136 Program Graduates 04 Raw Value 9 5 Std Value 9 5 05 Raw Value 9 4 Std Value 94 06 Raw Value 9 4 Std Value 9 4 07 Raw Value 9 4 Std Value 94 Survey Results 08 Raw Value 138 Std Value 138 09 Raw Value 126 Std Value 126 10 Raw Value 109 Std Value 109 11 Raw Value 138 Std Value 138 University Library 12 Raw Value 88 Std Value 8 8 Research Support 13 Raw Value 115 Std Value 115 14 Raw Value 104 Std Value 10 4 Publication Records 15 Raw Value 133 Std Value 133 16 Std Value 133 ~m~ ~ ~ Standard Mean Deviation 19 11 50 10 20 18 50 10 25 21 50 10 a47 a28 50 10 6~0 a7 50 10 .81 .12 50 10 56 ~ 14 50 10 2~6 1~0 50 10 1~7 .5 50 10 1~2 .2 50 10 e7 .4 50 10 .2 1~0 50 10 .63 .22 50 10 8419 6463 50 10 92 50 50 90 10 10 7 10 39 42 6 42 43 6 10 41 43 all e23 37 41 6~9 6~5 37 42 .67 .72 38 43 .33 .47 34 44 1~4 1~8 37 41 1~1 1~3 37 41 .9 1~0 39 43 .2 .3 39 41 - 1.0 ~ ~ 6 38 42 .35 .44 37 41 2950 3195 42 42 13 26 41 43 42 43 13 15 45 46 10 13 44 46 13 15 44 45 .27 e33 43 45 6~2 6~0 47 50 .74 .79 44 48 e52 .55 47 49 2~0 2~3 43 47 1~5 1~6 45 48 1~0 1~1 43 48 .4 .5 44 46 ~.5 ~e 3 43 45 .52 .60 45 49 4445 5614 44 46 34 47 44 45 44 45 16 47 15 47 20 47 .39 47 5~9 51 ~3 52 .58 51 2~5 49 1~7 50 1.1 48 ~5 46 ~0 48 .65 51 6462 47 63 47 46 18 49 19 49 24 49 .57 54 5.8 52 .85 53 .61 54 2.7 51 1.8 52 1.2 52 .6 49 .3 51 .70 53 7267 48 73 48 47 8 9 21 25 52 55 22 27 51 54 27 35 51 55 .67 .76 57 60 5.7 5.4 54 58 .88 .90 56 58 .64 .67 56 58 3.0 3.4 54 58 2.0 2.1 56 58 1.2 1.3 52 57 .8 1.0 53 58 .7 .9 55 57 35 64 40 61 52 63 .88 65 5.2 61 .94 61 .73 62 4.0 64 2.4 64 1.4 61 1.3 65 1.6 64 .77 56 9120 12650 16796 51 57 63 .83 .88 59 61 94 152 50 57 51 55 224 65 65 NV1-~: ~canaaralZea values reported in the preceding table have been computed from exact values of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported here. Since the scale used to compute measure 16 is entirely arbitrary, only data in standardized form are reported for this measure.
From page 53...
... 53 TABLE 3.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 139 Programs in Biochemistry Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Program Size 01 .48 .57 .26 .03 -.07 .09 .58 .54 .38 .53 .40 .08 .33 .62 .58 02 .72 .47 .16 .23 .27 .63 .67 .14 .63 .46 .35 .46 .66 .65 03 .29 .17 .15 .18 .60 .61 .26 .59 .48 .32 .27 .59 .55 Program Graduates 04 .11 .27 .39 .70 .70 .04 .70 .54 .42 .50 .59 .62 05 .28 .34 .15 .21 .22 .17 .02 .16 .03 .11 .12 06 .66 .24 .27 .18 .2S .09 .28 .12 .20 .22 07 .35 .36 .14 .34 .16 .33 .29 .33 .34 Survey Results 08 .96 .21 .96 .63 .62 .69 .83 .83 09 .27 .92 .61 .58 .64 .79 .79 10 .21 .10 .17 '.03 .31 .28 11 .64 .60 .69 .84 .85 University Library 12 .21 .56 .67 .66 Research Support 13 14 Publication Records 15 16 .30 .48 .47 .71 .71 .98 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies.
From page 54...
... FIGURE 3.1 Mean rating af scholarly quality of faculty (measure 08) versus number of faculty members (measure 01)
From page 55...
... r = .73 O O +/+++++++++/+++++++++/+++++++++/+++++++++/++++++++~/+++++++++/+++++++++/+++++++++/+++++++++/+++++++++/ 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81 100 121 Measure 02 (square root scale)
From page 56...
... 56 TABLE 3.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Biochemistry Respondents N % Field of Specialization Biochemistry 179 77 Molecular Biology 33 14 Other/Unknown 22 9 Faculty Rank Professor 118 50 Associate Professor 82 35 Assistant Professor 34 15 Year of Highest Degree Pre-1950 21 9 1950-59 40 17 1960-69 108 46 Post-1969 60 26 Unknown 5 2 Evaluator Selection Nominated by Institution 191 82 Other 43 18 Survey Form With Faculty Names 210 90 Without Names 24 10 Total Evaluators 234 100
From page 57...
... indicate a oaf idle interval of ~.5 canard errors arm the reported Man (x} of each prearm.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.