Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

5 Small Launch Vehicles
Pages 37-40

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 37...
... Missions that call for multiple satellites in common orbit planes can accrue cost benefits with multisatellite launches on higher performing launch vehicles. Satellites that must carry on-board propulsion for orbit maintenance or attitude control can sometimes effectively exploit lower performance, lower cost launch vehicles to place them into low initial orbits and then use their own propulsion systems for final orbit insertion.
From page 38...
... It is this superior cost efficiency of the Delta II, along with its excellent reliability, which makes launching multiple satellites on a single Delta II an attractive alternative to multiple smaller launch vehicles when possible. In fact, early experiences (failures)
From page 39...
... U.S. LAUNCH VEHICLES Delta II 7920/253,2755047/49 Delta II 73201,750350/0 Pegasus XL2251418a/23b Taurus XL/Orion 38945240/0 Taurus/Orion 38860223/3 Athena 32,200300/0 Athena 2700221/1 Athena 120016l/2 Conestoga 1229 220 12 0/0 Conestoga 1620 540 18 0/1 FOREIGN LAUNCH VEHICLES CZ-2D (China)
From page 40...
... This is currently not the case: There is a significant gap in capability between the Pegasus/Athena/Taurus launch vehicles and the Delta II. Plans to fill this gap by numerous suppliers are encouraging, as are the efforts by launch vehicle suppliers to provide a range of fairing sizes to accommodate a larger percentage of potential missions.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.