Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences examines how to update human subjects protections regulations so that they effectively respond to current research contexts and methods. With a specific focus on social and behavioral sciences, this consensus report aims to address the dramatic alterations in the research landscapes that institutional review boards (IRBs) have come to inhabit during the past 40 years. The report aims to balance respect for the individual persons whose consent to participate makes research possible and respect for the social benefits that productive research communities make possible.
The ethics of human subjects research has captured scientific and regulatory attention for half a century. To keep abreast of the universe of changes that factor into the ethical conduct of research today, the Department of Health and Human Services published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in July 2011. Recognizing that widespread technological and societal transformations have occurred in the contexts for and conduct of human research since the passage of the National Research Act of 1974, the ANPRM revisits the regulations mandated by the Act in a correspondingly comprehensive manner. Its proposals aim to modernize the Common Rule and to improve the efficiency of the work conducted under its auspices. Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences identifies issues raised in the ANPRM that are critical and feasible for the federal government to address for the protection of participants and for the advancement of the social and behavioral sciences. For each identified issue, this report provides guidance for IRBs on techniques to address it, with specific examples and best practice models to illustrate how the techniques would be applied to different behavioral and social sciences research procedures.
Table of Contents
|1 Introduction and Background||13-32|
|2 Rationales, Definitions, and Procedures Related to Research Not Involving Human Subjects and the Proposed Excused Category of Research||33-58|
|3 Determining Minimal Risk in Social and Behavioral Research||59-88|
|4 Informed Consent||89-108|
|5 Informational Risk in the Social and Behavioral Sciences||109-134|
|6 Improving the IRB Process||135-148|
|Appendix A: Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ("Common Rule")||149-152|
|Appendix B: Table of Committee-Recommended Levels of IRB Review and Oversight||153-158|
|Appendix C: Acronyms||159-160|
|Appendix D: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members||161-168|
Committee Chair Susan Fiske provides some insights into the report, Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. The report examines how to update human subjects protections regulations so that they effectively respond to current research contexts and methods.
The National Academies Press and the Transportation Research Board have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to offer a variety of options for reusing our content. You may request permission to:
For most Academic and Educational uses no royalties will be charged although you are required to obtain a license and comply with the license terms and conditions.
For information on how to request permission to translate our work and for any other rights related query please click here.
For questions about using the Copyright.com service, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
22 Rosewood Drive
Danvers, MA 01923
Tel (toll free): 855/239-3415 (select option 1)
Loading stats for Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences...