Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Executive Summary Astrobiology is a scientific discipline devoted to the study of life in the universeâits origins, evolution, distri- bution, and future. It brings together the physical and biological sciences to address some of the most fundamental questions of the natural world: How do living systems emerge? How do habitable worlds form and how do they evolve? Does life exist on worlds other than Earth? As an endeavor of tremendous breadth and depth, astrobiology requires interdisciplinary investigation in order to be fully appreciated and examined. As part of a concerted effort to undertake such a challenge, the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI) was established in 1998 as an innovative way to develop the field of astrobiology and provide a scientific framework for flight missions. Now that the NAI has been in existence for almost a decade, the time is ripe to assess its achievements. At the request of NASAâs Associate Administrator for the Science Mission Directorate (SMD), the Com- mittee on the Review of the NASA Astrobiology Institute undertook the assignment to determine the progress made by the NAI in developing the field of astrobiology (Appendix A). It must be emphasized that the purpose of this study was not to undertake a review of the scientific accomplishments of NASAâs Astrobiology program, in general, or of the NAI, in particular. Rather, the objective of the study is to evaluate the success of the NAI in achieving its stated goals of: 1. Conducting, supporting, and catalyzing collaborative interdisciplinary research; 2. Training the next generation of astrobiology researchers; 3. Providing scientific and technical leadership on astrobiology investigations for current and future space missions; 4. Exploring new approaches, using modern information technology, to conduct interdisciplinary and col- laborative research among widely distributed investigators; and 5. Supporting outreach by providing scientific content for use in K-12 education programs, teaching under- graduate classes, and communicating directly with the public. The committeeâs assessment of the NAIâs progress in these five areas is presented in Chapters 2 to 6, respec- tively. In evaluating the success of the NAI in achieving these five goals, the committee was requested to address the following considerations:
ASSESSMENT OF THE NASA ASTROBIOLOGY INSTITUTE a. Has the NAI developed, as envisioned, as an evolving experiment in cutting-edge, distributed, collaborative science and education in astrobiology? b. Does the NAI provide a unique and useful complement to other Astrobiology program support mechanisms (e.g., individual grants to principal investigators), and if improvements need to be made in this area, what are they? c. Are the research, training, and public educational activities of the NAI appropriately balanced in terms of investments and outcomes, services to NAI members and external partners, and activities that engage and support the wider astrobiology community and the needs of young professionals? d. What other activities or roles not currently undertaken by the NAI might be appropriate in the future? The committeeâs responses to these four criteria can be found in subsections in Chapters 2 to 6. Specific rec- ommendations and suggestions as to how the recommendations might be implemented can be found in the final subsection of each of the same chapters. Information on the origins of NASAâs Astrobiology program and the NAI; a summary of comments on the role, status, and scientific importance of astrobiology from previous NRC reports; and some information on the budgetary history and the impact of recent cuts to the Astrobiology budget can be found in Chapter 1. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Overall, the committee is unanimous in finding that the NAI has fulfilled its original mandate. The NAI has played a key role in supporting the development of astrobiology and has positively affected NASAâs current and future missions. The committee recommends that the NAI should continue to be supported. Specific findings and recommendations are organized according to the five goals and four criteria listed above NAI Goal 1âInterdisciplinary Research Although the committee was not charged to undertake a review of the NAIâs scientific contributions, it is difficult to evaluate the NAIâs success in conducting, supporting, and catalyzing collaborative interdisciplinary research without some brief mention of the NAIâs scientific achievements. Consideration of the NAIâs major scientific contributions reveals that some are highly interdisciplinary but that some are not. In the committeeâs view, interdisciplinarity must be viewed as the orientation and emergent quality of an overall enterprise and not as a requirement or expectation levied on every piece of work produced by that enterprise. Thus, with respect to the goal of conducting, supporting, and catalyzing collaborative interdisciplinary research, the committee finds that the NAI has: â¢ Successfully promoted interdisciplinary science; â¢ Stimulated many scientific achievements; â¢ Successfully integrated life sciences into NASA programs; â¢ Often effectively leveraged ongoing and new research; â¢ Contributed to the establishment of new astrobiology programs worldwide; and â¢ Supported programs that are widely distributed throughout the United States. The committee makes the following recommendations: â¢ The NAI should institute better measures of performance and progress to improve the accountability of its nodes in promoting astrobiology as a field of interdisciplinary and collaborative study; â¢ The NAI should improve the tracking and critical assessment of its publications; and â¢ The NAI should encourage and cultivate interactions with non-NAI astrobiology teams and organizations throughout the world.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Suggestions as to how these recommendations might be implemented can be found in Chapter 2. NAI Goal 2âTraining the Next Generation of Astrobiologists The NAIâs commendable effort to train the next generation of astrobiologists faces many challenges. The continuation of funding beyond the 5-year lifetime of NAI teams is not guaranteed. Young researchers seeking to establish themselves outside the protective environment of NAI teams face particular challenges when trying to accomplish interdisciplinary research within the highly discipline-oriented organization of research universities. The pool of resources for training new researchers is limited. Nevertheless, with respect to the goal of training the next generation of astrobiology researchers, the committee finds that the NAI has: â¢ Trained graduates who are now employed in academic and other positions; â¢ Promoted the establishment of new programs and faculty positions in astrobiology at several universities; and â¢ Not been sufficiently proactive in countering the negative effects on training and education programs caused by recent cuts to NASAâs Astrobiology budget. The committee recommends that the NAI should work toward developing more consistent educational and training opportunities. In addition, the NAI should ensure more stable support of graduate students and postdoc- toral researchers in astrobiology. Suggestions as to how this recommendation might be implemented can be found in Chapter 3. NAI Goal 3âLeadership for Current and Future Space Missions Although the NAI has not played a significant role in the selection or execution of NASA missions, the field of astrobiology provides the intellectual and scientific foundation for much if not all of NASAâs current robotic solar system exploration missions and many of its astrophysical activities relating to the search for and character- ization of extrasolar planets. The NAIâs influence has been indirect and has come through the actions of individual scientists affiliated with NAI teams. This is probably the most appropriate vehicle for the NAIâs involvement in NASAâs flight program. Thus, with respect to the goal of providing scientific and technical leadership on astrobiol- ogy investigations for current and future space missions, the committee finds that the NAI has: â¢ Encouraged astrobiologists to provide needed recommendations and expertise to NASA for mission planning; â¢ Promoted the participation of astrobiologists in the science teams for current and future missions; â¢ Organized activities, such as focus groups, that have strongly influenced NASA missions; and â¢ Identified astrobiology questions that underpin most of NASAâs current flight programs. The committee believes that the NAI must remain clearly focused on supporting NASAâs spaceflight missions, and so its highest-priority recommendation is as follows: Because its most critical function is to ensure that its research activities clearly contribute to NASAâs current and future spaceflight activities, the NAI should be more proactive in identifying future astrobiology missions. In addition, the NAI should actively encourage a partnership between astrobiologists and their engineering counterparts to help define future NASA missions. The committee also recommends that in selecting new nodes, the NAI should give more weight to the potential contribution of the proposed research to future NASA missions. Suggestions as to how these recommendations might be implemented can be found in Chapter 4. NAI Goal 4âUse of Information Technology The NAI experience with information technology has been mixed. Those aspects of the application of informa- tion technology within the control of NAI Centralâe.g., its extensive and informative Web page with its archive
ASSESSMENT OF THE NASA ASTROBIOLOGY INSTITUTE of astrobiology seminars and research resultsâare second to none in NASA. But those aspects of the utilization of information technology outside the direct control of NAI Centralâe.g., the use of collaborative work tools by the researchers affiliated with NAI teamsâhas been less successful. The lack of success most likely results from social rather than technical factors. Thus, with respect to the goal of exploring new approaches using modern information technology to conduct interdisciplinary and collaborative research among widely distributed investi- gators, the committee finds that: â¢ The substantial efforts by NAI Central to improve communications among NAI members have achieved some significant successes; and â¢ The NAI has been less successful in promoting the use of collaborative work tools by the researchers affiliated with its participating teams. The committee recommends that the NAI should vigorously pursue new approaches using modern informa- tion technologies to increase the effectiveness of the NAI nodes. In particular, additional efforts by NAI Central are needed to ensure that new communications tools are used to enhance the effectiveness of interdisciplinary and collaborative research and training. Suggestions as to how this recommendation might be implemented can be found in Chapter 5. NAI Goal 5âEducation and Outreach The publicâs interest in the subject matter of astrobiology has enabled the effective leveraging of funds, part- nerships, and expertise far greater in scope than those made available by the NAI itself. Thus, with respect to the goal of supporting outreach by providing scientific content for K-12 education programs, teaching undergraduate classes, and communicating directly with the public, the committee finds that the NAI has: â¢ Successfully promoted astrobiology as a field with broad-based public appeal; â¢ Developed effective programs for outreach to the general public; and â¢ Enabled minority educational activities. The committee makes the following recommendations: â¢ The NAI should be more strategic in exploiting synergies among nodes in K-12 education, minority educa- tion, and teacher training; and â¢ The NAI should address the specific requirements for teaching astrobiology at the undergraduate level. Suggestions as to how these recommendations might be implemented can be found in Chapter 6.