Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
References Als-Nielsen, B., Chen, W., Gluud, C., and Kjaergard, L. 2003 Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(7), 921. Ba, H., and Sosnowy, C. 2006 NASA international space station EarthKAM program evaluation report. Unpublished report submitted to the NASA e-Education Department. Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center, New York, NY. Banilower, E.R., Boyd, S.E., Pasley, J.D., and Weiss, I.R. 2006 Lessons from a decade of mathematics and science reform: A capstone report for the local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research. Barron, B. 2006 Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193-224. Benson, Penick, and Associates, Inc. 2001 Science, Engineering, Mathematics and Aeronautics Academy (SEMAA): Summa- tive evaluation of model, Cuyahoga Community College original site (1993-2001). Unpublished report prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. BESTâBuilding Engineering and Science Talent 2004 A bridge for all: Higher education design principles to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering, and math, building engineering and science talent. Avail- able: http://www.bestworkforce.org/PDFdocs/BEST_BridgeforAll_HighEdFINAL.pdf [ Â accessed March 2007]. Csikszentmihali, M., Rathunde, K., and Whalen, S. 1993 Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press. 132
REFERENCES 133 Davis, H., Davey, B., Manzer, R., and Peterson, R. 2006 Digital learning network evaluation tool development: Reduced gravity module. ÂInternal evaluation prepared by Technology for Learning Consortium, Inc., for Robert M. Starr, Program Manager, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. Davis, H., Palak, D., Martin, J.H., and Ruberg, L. 2006 NASA explorer schools evaluation brief 4: Evidence that the model is working. NASA-sponsored report prepared by Classroom of the Future Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, Erma Ora Byrd Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, Wheeling Jesuit University. DeSimone, L.M., Porter, A.S., Garet, M.S., Yoon, K.S., and Birman, B. 2002 Effects of professional development on teachersâ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112. Engle, R.A., and Conant, F.R. 2002 Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learnersâ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483. Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology 1993 The federal investment in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology educa- tion: Where now? what next? sourcebook. Report of the expert panel for the review of federal education programs in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED366502.) Available: http://www.eric. ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/15/41/fc.pdf [accessed February 2007]. Garet, M., Birman, B.F., Porter, A.C., DeSimone, L., Herman, R., and Yoon, K.S. 1999 Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower program. (Prepared under contract EA97001001 by American Institutes for Research for the U.S. Department of Education Office of the Under Secretary.) Available: http://www. ed.gov/inits/teachers/eisenhower/designlessons.pdf [accessed February 2007]. Gutbezahl, J. 2007 NASA space science education/public outreach: Summative evaluation report, March 1998-June 2007. Prepared for the NASA Science Mission Directorate by Program Evaluation and Research Group at Lesley University. (In collaboration with Susan Baker Cohen, Sabra Lee, and Jodi Sandler.) Available: http://science.hq.nasa.gov/Â research/NASA_2007_Summative_report.pdf [accessed February 2007]. Hall, G. 2007 A review of the literature and the INSPIRE model: STEM in out-of-school time. Paper prepared for the National Research Council Committee to Review and Evalu- ate NASAâs Pre-college Education Program, Washington, DC. Available: http://www. nationalacademies.org/bose/NASA_PreCollege_Eval_Study_Homepage.html [accessed February 2007]. Hernandez, V., McGee, S., Kirby, J., Reese, D., and Martin, J. 2004a NASA explorer schools evaluation brief 2. A program in the making: Evidence from summer 2003 workshops. Report sponsored by NASA (NES/EB2/2-2004) and pre- pared by Classroom of the Future Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, Erma Ora Byrd Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, Wheeling Jesuit University. Available: http://www.cet.edu/research/pdf/EPHernandez04.pdf [accessed February 2007]. 2004b NASA explorer schools evaluation brief 3. A program in the making: Year 1 annual report. Report sponsored by NASA (NES/EB3/7-2004) and prepared by Classroom of the Future Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, Erma Ora Byrd Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, Wheeling Jesuit University. Available: http://www.cet. edu/research/pdf/NES-EB3.pdf [accessed February 2007].
134 NASAâS ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM Hidi, S., and Renninger, K.A. 2006 The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. Hopkins, R. 2007a Implementation plan. SpaceRef.com Newsletter. Available: http://www.spaceref.com/ news/viewsr.html?pid=24700 [accessed July 2007]. 2007b Strategic communications framework implementation plan. Available: http://images. spaceref.com/news/2007/StratCommPlan.2007.06.26.pdf [accessed June 2007]. Horn, J.G., and McKinley, K.H. 2004 Evaluation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration aerospace education services program (NASA-AESP). Technical report submitted to NASA by Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University. 2006 The final report of a study of the aerospace education service programâs role and impact among selected partners. Report prepared for NASA by Oklahoma State University. House, E.R. 2006 Blowback: Consequences of evaluation for evaluation. Keynote address to the Ameri- can Evaluation Association, November 4, Portland, OR. University of Colorado professor emeritus. International Technology Education Association 2000 Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author. Kerlinger, F.N., and Lee, H.B. 2000 Foundations of behavioral research: Fourth edition. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College. Kuhn, D., and Franklin, S. 2006 The second decade: What develops (and how)? In W. Damon and R. Lerner Â(Series Eds.) and D. Kuhn and R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: ÂCognition, perception, and language (vol. 2, 6th ed., pp. 953-993). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Lach, M. 2007 Federal STEM education programs: Educatorsâ perspectives. Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, May 15. Available: http:// democrats.science.house.gov/Media/File/Commdocs/hearings/2007/research/15may/ lach_testimony.pdf [accessed October 2007]. Lawrenz, F. 2007 Summary and critique of selected evaluations of NASA educational programs. Paper prepared for the National Research Council Committee for the Review and Evaluation of NASAâs Pre-College Education Program, Washington, DC. Available: http://www. nationalacademies.org/bose/NASA_PreCollege_Eval_Study_Homepage.html [accessed September 2007]. Lipstein, R., and Renninger, K.A. 2006 Putting things into words: The development of 12-15-year-old studentsâ interest for writing. In P. Boscolo and S. Hidi (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice (pp. 113-140). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. McGee, S., Hernandez, V., and Kirby, J. 2003 NASA explorer schools evaluation brief 1: Evaluation framework, evaluating the quality and impact of the NASA explorer schools program. Report sponsored by NASA (NES/EB1/7-2003) and prepared by Classroom of the Future Center for Educa- tional TechnologiesÂ®, Erma Ora Byrd Center for Educational TechnologiesÂ®, ÂWheeling Jesuit University. Wheeling, WV: Classroom of the Future. Available: http://www.cet. edu/research/pdf/EPMcgee03.pdf [accessed February 2007].
REFERENCES 135 Moiser, C.I. 1947 A critical examination of the concepts of face validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 7, 191-206. Mundry, S. 2007 Alignment of the NASA explorer school model with models for school improvement and reform. Paper prepared for the National Research Council Committee for the Review and Evaluation of NASAâs Pre-College Education Program, Washington, DC. Available: http://www.nationalacademies.org/bose/NASA_PreCollege_Eval_Study_ Homepage.html [accessed April 2007]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1992 NASAâs strategic plan for education: A strategy for change, 1993-1998. (EP-289, O Â ffice of Education.) Washington, DC: Author. 1995 Partners in education: A strategy for integrating education and public outreach into NASAâs space science programs. Washington, DC: Author, Office of Space Science. Available: http://spacescience.nasa.gov/admin/pubs/edu/educont.htm [accessed Febru- ary 2007]. 1996 Implementing the Office of Space Science (OSS) education/public outreach strategy: A report by the OSS-space science advisory committee education/public outreach task force. Washington, DC: Author, Office of Space Science. Available: http://spacescience. nasa.gov/admin/pubs/edu/imp_plan.pdf [accessed February 2007]. 2003a NASAâs education enterprise strategy. Available: http://education.nasa.gov/pdf/ 55377main_32915-Education_508.pdf [accessed February 2007]. 2003b NASA 2003 strategic plan. Available: www.nasa.gov/pdf/1968main_strategi.pdf [ Â accessed February 2007]. 2003c Space science education and public outreach: Inspiring the next generation of Âexplorers. (NASA Space Science Education and Public Outreach annual report for federal fiscal year 2003.) Report submitted to the Office of Management and Budget, SeptemberÂ 24. Washington, DC: Author. 2006a NASA education strategic coordination framework: A portfolio approach. Adopted by the Education Coordinating Committee, February 24. Available: http://education. nasa.gov/pdf/151156main_NASA_Booklet_final_3.pdf [accessed April 2007]. 2006b Explanatory guide to the NASA science mission directorate education and public outreach evaluation factors. Available: http://science.hq.nasa.gov/research/SMD_EPO_ Guide_v2.pdf [accessed February 2007]. 2006c National SEMAA office performance report: 4th quarter, FY-2006. July 1, 2006- Â eptember 30, 2006. Prepared by Paragon TEC Contract No. NAS3-02123, ÂCleveland, S OH. 2007 NASA organizational chart. Available: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/hq/pdf/182318main_ NASA_Org_Chart_July-2007.pdf [accessed July 2007]. National Research Council 1994 NASAâs education programs: Defining goals, assessing outcomes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1995 National science education standards. Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineer- ing Education National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2006 Americaâs lab report: Investigations in high school science. Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, S.R. Singer, M.L. Hilton, and H.A. S Â chweingruber (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
136 NASAâS ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM 2007a Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st ÂCentury: An Agenda for American Science and Technology. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2007b Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning K-8, R. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, and A. Shouse (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2007c Portals to the universe: The NASA astronomy science centers. Committee on NASA Astronomy Science Centers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Penuel, W.R., and Means, B. 1999 Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: An analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. (Research through a grant from the National Science Foundation, ESI-9802033.) Prepared by SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Presidentâs Commission on Moon, Mars, and Beyond 2004 A journey to inspire, innovate, and discover. Available: http://www.aura-astronomy. org/nv/Journey%20to%20Inspire%20Innovate%20and%20Discover.pdf [accessed July 2007]. Renninger, K.A. 2000 Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C.Â Sansone and J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Renninger, K.A., and Hidi, S. 2002 Interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield and J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). New York: Academic Press. Rosenberg, S.L., Heck, D.J., and Banilower, E.R. 2005 Does teacher content preparation moderate the impacts of professional development? A longitudinal analysis of LSC teacher questionnaire data. Prepared for the National Science Foundation by Horizon Research, Inc. Available: http://www.pdmathsci.net/ reports/rosenberg_heck_banilower_2005.pdf [accessed February 2007]. Rosendahl, J., Sakimoto, P., Pertzborn, R., and Cooper, L. 2004 The NASA office of space science education and public outreach program. Advances in Space Research, 24, 2127-2135. Rossi, P.H., and Freeman, H.E. 1993 Evaluation: A systematic approach, fifth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Schwerin, T. 2006 NASA education portfolio: Data call. Prepared by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, conducted under NASA Grant NNG04GE83G (May 31). Available: http:// www.strategies.org/Portfolio/Final/ExecutiveSummaryReport.pdf [accessed June 2007]. Shadish, W., Cook, T., and Campbell, D. 2002 Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Supovitz, J.A., and Turner, H.M. 2000 The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 37, 963-980. Tai, R.H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., and Fan, X. 2006 Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. Available: http://www. sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/312/5777/1143.pdf [accessed October 2007].
REFERENCES 137 Torgerson, D.J., and Roberts, C. 1999 Understanding controlled trials: Baseline imbalance in randomized controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 319(7203), 185. Torgerson, D.J., and Torgerson, C.J. 2003 Avoiding bias in randomized controlled trials in educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 36-46. U.S. Department of Education 2006 10 facts about K-12 education funding. Available: http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/ fed/10facts/index.html [accessed June 2007]. 2007a Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. (May). Available: http://www.ed.gov/ about/inits/ed/competitiveness/acc-mathscience/index.html [accessed February 2007]. 2007b Overview. Available: http://www.ed.gov/about/landing.jhtml?src=gu [accessed June 2007]. Weiss, C. 1998 Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Weiss, I. 2007 Federal STEM education programs: Educatorsâ perspectives. May 15, 2007. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education of the House Committee on Science and Technology. Available: http://democrats.science.house.gov/Media/File/ Commdocs/hearings/2007/research/15may/weiss_testimony.pdf [accessed June 2007]. Westat 2001 NASA education program evaluation review (NEPER): Final report. Unpublished paper (August). Rockville, MD: Author. Westmoreland, H., and Little, P. 2006 Exploring quality standards for middle school after school programs: What we know and what we need to know. A summit report. Harvard Family Research Project; Cambridge, MA. Available: www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/content/projects/afterschool/Â conference/summit-2005-summary.pdf [accessed March 2007]. Winterton, J. 2007 Federal STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education pro- grams. Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Research and Science Education of the Committee on Science and Technology (June 6). Available: http://democrats. science.house.gov/Media/File/Commdocs/hearings/2007/research/06jun/winterton_ t Â estimony.pdf [accessed June 2007].