National Academies Press: OpenBook

Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report (1969)

Chapter: Appendix B: Communications Subsystem

« Previous: Appendix A: Survival Subsystem
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 44
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Communications Subsystem." National Academy of Engineering. 1969. Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18456.
×
Page 49

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

APPENDIX B COMMUNICATIONS SUBSYSTEM PART 1, ELECTROMAGNETIC COMMUNICATIONS Two approaches to underground communication should be considered: one in which a radio communications system would be set up for ordinary conversation during routine mining operations and which would have some possibility for surviving for emergency communications after a disaster; and one in which electromagnetic beacons would be provided to working crews so that they could signal their survival if all else failed. Standard Radio Communications A practical system might consist of mobile radio trans- mitters for use by individuals or working crews. The signals from these transceivers would be relayed by telephone wire to the surface after being converted from the transmitted frequency to a phone line frequency by one or several relay stations under- ground. To be practical, the relay stations would have to have a range of 1, 000 to 2, 000 ft over which they could receive the transmissions from the portable transceivers. It would in fact be preferable to have several shorter-range repeaters rather than a single long-range repeater, because several would provide overlapping coverage and a greater chance of partial survival of the system in case of a disaster. The critical question in the use of such a system is whether a portable transceiver can be built that has a range adequate to meet the purposes. On the basis of published results of attempts at radio communications in mine openings, it is not clear if this might be possible. Further careful studies of radio transmissions, particularly as a function of frequency and antenna orientation, will be required to evaluate this. One approach might be to use high enough frequencies that the radiated energy would travel through the mine openings as a guided wave. Typical mine openings have dimensions of the order to several meters; and therefore, the wavelengths would have to be of the order of several meters--corresponding to frequencies - 22 -

- 23 - in the 100- to 200-MHz range. It is believed there is no experience with the use of such frequencies underground. At such frequencies, there are a number of practical problems, such as a difficulty in refracting waves around corners in the mine openings and scatter- ing caused by the variable cross section of the wave guide. However, in view of the lack of experience with these frequencies, some experimental work should be done, particularly since standard transmitters in this range are available. The other approach is one of brute force, in which the radio communication is done through the material between the transmitter and the repeater. In the extreme, if the range becomes great enough, this reduces to the problem of communicating directly to the surface with electromagnetic waves. Ordinarily, though, the range of a radio transmitter along the seam being mined should be considerably greater than the range to the surface. Range of radio transmissions is determined largely by the so-called skin depth, which is the distance over which the radio signal is reduced by a factor of about 2/3 because of heat loss in a conducting medium. Bituminous coal seams are reported to have a conductivity range from 10~2 to 10"^ mhos per meter, whereas the rock overlying a bituminous coal seam normally has a conductivity of 10" * to 10 mhos per meter. Removal of coal and backfilling of mined-out areas with rock rubble probably decreases the overall conductivity by a factor of 2 or so. The net result of these probable electrical pro- perties for coal and overburden is that radio range in a coal seam is probably three to ten times greater than the range through the over- lying structure. At frequencies around 1 MHz, where it may be possible to use standard portable transceivers, a skin depth will be of the order of 300 ft in coal and 50 ft in the overburden. In a distance of seven skin depths, a radiated signal is reduced by a factor of 1, 000 by attenuation, and this constitutes a practical limitation for detection with a sensitive receiver. Thus, it might be possible to transmit at MHz frequencies through a coal seam, if the field can be radiated in such a way that it sees only the electrical properties of the coal, and not the combined properties of the coal and the surrounding rock. Perhaps it would be feasible to generate horizontally polarized waves with the transmitter to accomplish this.

- 24 - If experimentation shows that the effective conductivity is too high to permit operation at MHz frequencies, consideration might be given to ELF transmissions in the vicinity of 10 kHz. The attenuation at this frequency is lower by a factor of 10, allow- ing about ten times the distance of transmission for the same radiated power as at 1 MHz. However, antennas such as might be used on a portable transceiver in a mine opening are very inefficient at these lower frequencies. There is probably an optimum frequency not too far from 1 MHz where the increasing inefficiency of antennas at lower frequencies offsets the increasing penetration obtained. The costs of such a communication system are as follows: Standard transceivers in the 1 - to 10-MHz range or in the 100- to 300-MHz range cost from a few hundred to a thousand dollars. If a nonstandard frequency range is to be used, and particularly if it is to be a low frequency, a portable transceiver could cost from $2, 000 to $5, 000, for small quantities. The repeater station will cost about $10, 000 to about $35, 000, depending on how standard the ultimate system would be. Installation of armored telephone cable in existing ventilation shafts would cost about $1 per foot, or about $3 per foot if new holes had to be drilled. There would also be operating costs involved in maintenance of the surface-based switchboard. Careful consideration should be given to the feasibility of such a system, even if initial experiments seem to be negative, inasmuch as the system would provide continuous underground communication for standard operations, as well as emergency communications. A very important advantage of a continuous system is that monitors could be placed in the mine to record the levels of carbon monoxide and methane (and possibly temperature) with warnings transmitted instan- taneously to the surface switchboard. This would provide the operator a chance to prevent a disaster if explosive gases build up in an unoc- cupied part of the mine, and it could give surface personnel the infor- mation they need to guide survivors to the surface after an explosion. The radio relay system does not, of course, provide the full answer, even if it works in some mines. Other mines will be too small to warrant the use of such a permanent system, and if such a system is available, it is too complex to assure that after an explo- sion, everyone underground will have communications. The system should be backed up with an emergency beacon system.

- 25 - Emergency Beacon System The requirements for this system would be a high degree of reliability in all respects, even with the compromised channel capacity. It must be rugged, reasonably inexpensive, and utterly reliable. The use of an audio-frequency electromagnetic beacon has been suggested and seems quite feasible. An electromagnetic field would be generated with either a grounded wire or an induction coil by the trapped miner, and then, surface personnel would search for such beacons. A frequency between 500 to 1, 000 cps would assure penetration, even under the most adverse conditions. The beacon would consist of a battery, a buzzer, and a key to interrupt the signal. Power would be applied to either a grounded wire or to a coil of wire. Surface searchers would spot the source of the field and then communicate with the trapped individuals by laying out a large coil on the surface and transmitting downward with high power. The underground receiver would have a bandwidth of only a few hundred Hz, which would make the construction simple. Two-way communication could be effected by having voice transmissions down- ward, and the keyed code transmissions upward (the trapped individuals would not need to know code, because the proper response could be indicated by the downward voice transmission). Preliminary computations indicate that a coil antenna would be preferable in the mine to a grounded wire antenna. With a current of 0. 1 amp applied to a 500-turn 50-ft periphery coil (which could be unspooled from a small reel and which would weigh about 10 lb), the field would be readily detectable with sensitive equipment on the sur- face at distances of about a half mile from the spot over the beacon. A 60-ft grounded wire in the mine would provide about the same electric field at the surface for the same power consumption, but it suffers from several disadvantages .compared to the coil source: 1. Electric fields are detected with electrodes driven in the earth, so the search would be slower. 2. The electric field will be shorted out in the mine if the opening in which the wire is laid has rails in it.

- 26 - 3. The laying out of a grounded wire requires more participation by the trapped individual than does lay- ing out the coil; for example, in a ventilated area of the mine, the wall rock may be locally dried so that it provides poor contact. The individual would have to choose a spot with good contact properties, and it may be necessary to provide some sort of meter on the equipment to assure that sufficient current is being driven into the ground to be seen by surface searchers. Surface search equipment would consist of a search coil, if the source is a coil, connected to a sensitive turned voltmeter. Search is simplified if it can be assured that the frequency being sought is known within a few percent. If several beacons are being sought, there may be confusion from overlapping signals; and it would be desirable to have each beacon in a mine provided with a distinct frequency, per- haps separated by as much as 5 percent. The search equipment should best be operated by experienced personnel, to avoid confusion and save time. It is obvious that dry runs are essential to provide experience in locating underground beacons. A beacon should have a life of at least 48 hours; at a current of 0. 1 amp, a power supply with a capacity of at least 5 ampere-hours would have to be provided. A weight of a pound or two per ampere- hour is reasonable, so the full weight of the coil, the transmitter/ receiver and the batteries would be in the neighborhood of 20 Ib, with a volume of 1/2 to 1 cu ft. The equipment is obviously not man-portable, but would have to be placed at strategic locations in the mine or hung on mine cars. The possibility of an 8-oz 10-cu-in. beacon that would be man-portable is not foreseen at this time. The cost of a beacon system might be up to $200, without a receiver, and possibly $50 more with a receiver. The cost of the search equipment could be high, depending on how many sets are developed and who operates it. Estimates are the receiving and location equipment would cost between $10, 000 and $50, 000. The voice transmitter would cost about $2, 500 to $10, 000. A program should be carried out to evaluate the desirability of various modifications of a beacon from the human and mine engineering aspects.

- 27 - After this evaluation, parametric trade-off studies, development of prototype beacon and surface equipment, and tests of the prototype should be conducted. Tests of the prototype system should be conducted in all major coal producing areas of the United States to assure pene- tration of the different overlying formations with sufficient strength that the signal can be detected from a point over the beacon. None of this can be done currently with off-the-shelf equipment. It all could be done with existing components on an experimental basis, but not much of the available equipment could be operated with assured safety in a mine. In'particular, great care must be taken that any radio transmitter used underground will not detonate explosives.

- 28 - PART 2, SEISMIC COMMUNICATIONS Accurate location of and subsequent two-way communication with trapped miners following a mine accident is an integral part of the proposed system and of utmost importance to a successful rescue. A seismic approach using acoustic waves propagated through the rock and soil between the trapped miners and the surface appears to be feasible. An interim system consisting entirely of presently available instruments is described and its performance predicted. The system is not expected to be optimum, but will be adequate to provide, during the anticipated five-year research and development program, a capability that does not now exist. System Considerations One prime consideration is that the system have sufficient sensitivity that it can detect the miner-generated seismic signals at distances comparable to the dimensions of the area of possible entrapment. Another prime consideration is that the system be capable of locating the source of the signals with a precision commen- surate with the requirements for safe and efficient rescue operations. Accuracy of only a few hundred feet will be required if each section of the mine is equipped with refuge chambers. The mine map can be used for exact location of the chambers and seismic signals will be used only to determine which of the chambers are occupied. If the mine is not equipped with chambers, location accuracy of approximately jf 50 ft will be required. Although highly desirable, the ability to establish two-way communication between the miners and the surface is of secondary importance. Other important features of the surface system should include: • Quick and simple deployment • Portability • Battery-powered operation • All-weather operation • Computational simplicity and speed • High reliability--long shelf-life

- 29 - • Dual service for location and communication • Adaptability to widely varying seismic velocities, topography and geologic structure • Minimum maintenance • Capability of continuous operation for extended periods • Reasonable cost The subsurface part of the system should have the following features: • High reliability--long storage life • Nonexplosive and spark-proof design • Lightweight and rugged construction • Capability of being operated by one man • Requirement of little or no training for operation • Availability at multiple key locations in the mine • Minimum maintenance requirements • Capability of continuous operation for extended periods • Unit cost that makes storage of multiple units below ground economically feasible System Description The interim system is based on miner location and communication by means of seismic compressional pulses (P-waves) generated by striking the mine roof or walls with a hammer. Location is accomplished by an analysis of the relative arrival times of seismic signals at various elements of a large seismometer array. Two-way communication is achieved through a simple code based on sequences of hammer blows.

- 30 - Surface System Four subarrays of 19 seismometers each are deployed in a square approximately 1/2 mile across the diagonal. Each subarray is approximately 40 ft in diameter. All seismometers are perma- nently connected in parallel by shielded, polyur ethane-jacketed cable. Seismometers are 28-Hz natural-frequency instruments weighing about 2 lb each. Each seismometer subarray is laid out on a hexagonal grid with approximately 5-ft spacing between instruments. A battery-powered preamplifier in watertight case is located at the subarray center. This single channel output is transmitted by 1, 320 ft of 2-conductor shielded cable back to the recording equipment at the center of the large square array. Cables are laid out and picked up using portable breast-reels commonly used for seismic exploration work in areas not accessible by trucks. The four cables from the seismometer subarrays are plugged into an aluminum suitcase-mounted instrument package consisting of: • 60-Hz notch filters • 36 db per octave high-cut filters (variable gain in 6 to 12 db stops for up to 10 steps) • Power inverter and batteries Another aluminum suitcase contains a 4-channel strip-chart recorder. Paper speed is variable from 5 mm/sec to 200/sec. A plotting board with necessary straightedges, templates, and compasses is provided. Up-to-date maps of the mine workings on a scale of 1 in. = 200 ft are provided and can be mounted on the plotting board beneath a transparent worksheet. Specially constructed circular slide rules may be necessary to speed the computations when topography is rough and to allow for widely differing seismic velocities in different geographical regions. The array command post (CP) should also be provided shelter in case of bad weather--the back of a covered truck or simply a canvas tent. Battery-powered lamps must be provided for array deployment and computational work at night. Walkie-talkie radio or sound-powered phone communication will be required between the array CP and the rescue operations CP. A magnetic compass will be necessary for array orientation and location when array sites have not been previously selected and surveyed in. Spare batteries, extra rolls of strip-chart paper, and certain spare parts should be available at the array CP.

- 31 - Subsurface System The subsurface system 'will consist of an instrument for conversion of seismic motion to audible acoustic energy, a hammer, and a code chart and instructions for its use. The conversion of seismic energy to audible acoustic energy has been accomplished with a single seismometer, operational amplifier, thresholding circuitry, audio oscillator, and ear-plug speaker. These devices have been successfully used for personnel intrusion detection. Total weight is about 4 lb and the seismometer is equipped with a spike that may be driven into the mine roof for best reception. Any tool could be used for hammering. If available, a 10-lb hammer would be preferable. The signaling code and instructions for using it should be pasted inside each miner's helmet. System Operation Deployment A station wagon, 3/4-ton truck, or similar vehicle can transport the entire surface system. All elements of the system are portable and can be hand-carried into rough country if necessary. When the vehicle reaches the array CP at the center of the square array, several operations should be carried out simultaneously. The four cables should be laid out their full 1, 320-ft length at right angles to one another. If sufficient help is available, these cables can be laid and the seismometers carried to the subarray locations simultaneously. This operation requires 8 men and about 10 minutes; fewer helpers will increase the time proportionately. Each subarray can be laid out and connected in about 10 minutes. Subarray size and configuration are not critical, and pacing off distances between seismometers will provide sufficiently accurate subarray layout. While the subarrays are being laid out, another man can be setting up the CP equipment and checking continuity of cable connections as they are connected at the subarrays. After array deployment, all personnel should return to the array CP because their movement within or near the subarrays would constitute a major noise source. Ideally, array positions would have been surveyed-in for all likely locations over the mine workings when the system was installed. Tests could then be quickly performed to determine the proper subarray size and configuration for maximum noise rejection. Subarray velocities could also be accurately measured at that time by hammering at selected points in the mine.

- 32 - Although such site selection and calibration prior to an accident is desirable, it is not essential. Rough asimuth setting at the array center and the use of cables cut to the correct length (1, 320 ft) will permit rapid array deployment with enough con- figuration control to permit signal detection and a preliminary rough estimate of the miners' location. It is expected that after signal detection and rough location, the array would be moved so as to be centered over the estimated location and substantially reduce in size. Location The 4-pen recorder is operated at low speed (5 mm/sec) until a signal is observed. When signals are observed, the operator switches to high speed (200 mm/sec) in order to permit accurate (jfO.OOl sec) measurements of relative arrival times. With a 200-ft paper roll, the recorder can operate continuously for 2 hours at low speed with 40 high-speed runs of about 3 seconds duration each. If a signal is observed on three or four of the seismometer subarray outputs, the operator can get a rough location estimate. Since the array is large with respect to the mine depth, the seismic ray paths will be approximately horizontal in the subweathering rock. A quick computation will tell the operator whether the source is inside or outside the square array. If it is inside the array, the method of intersecting hyperbolas must be used for source location. If it is outside the array, an assumption of plane waves may be used and the outputs used in pairs to find the intersection of two straight lines along the two asimuth estimates. Once the rough location estimate is obtained, it will probably be necessary to move the array and reduce its size. Time required to pick up seismometers and cables will be the same as for deploy- ment. Thus with an 8- to 9-man crew, the array could be moved and back in operation in about 45 minutes. Reduction in array size (to a 500-ft square) will tend to minimize effects of irregular topography, geologic structure, and inhomogeneities. Since the source will almost surely be within the smaller square array, the intersecting hyperbola method will be used to obtain the best location estimate. Knowledge of mine depth and rock velocities in the area should give location precision of +25 ft.

- 33 - Communication The smaller array will probably have one or more subarrays with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that provides good communication capability. If not, the four subarrays may be moved to a point above the best location estimate and combined to give a single output with an improved SNR. When ready to communicate, a series of hammer blows on the ground surface will tell the miners that they have been located, that they should stop sending their location code and start sending the prearranged coded message regarding their condition, etc. Messages may also be sent by the surface array crew and picked up by the subsurface system. Information transfer by a pulse-coded system will necessarily be slow and may require repetition to ensure correct reception. A fairly good description of the following sub- surface conditions could probably be transmitted in about 15 minutes: • Condition of air • Condition of barricades • Number and seriousness of injuries • Adequacy of food and water supplies • Adequacy of first-aid supplies • Adequacy of breathing or other survival equipment • Number of survivors in that location • Estimate of survival time The prearranged code, taped inside every miner's helmet, would permit a selection of up to about six different messages to report on each category. After the general description of their situation, a more detailed but slower communication could be conducted by morse code (also inside the helmet). The miners could be advised to start walking out and given a route to follow.

- 34 - System Sensitivity Although no experiment has been conducted to measure the signal amplitudes obtainable at the surface with a hammer source in a mine (and vice versa), the signal amplitudes obtained in exploration seismology indicate that hammer blows should be easily detectable at ranges of 5, 000 ft or more. Seismic signals have been recorded by down-hole seismometers with a very high SNR at depths of 5, 000 ft. An experiment in shallow refraction seismology has shown good signal amplitudes from hammer blows obtainable with single seismometers at ranges of Z50 meters. Since this energy is refracted twice at the base of the low-velocity weathered layer and must penetrate that very absorbent layer twice, this range is very encouraging. Another experiment using a hammer source for shallow reflection exploration has demonstrated a good SNR for reflections from depths of 450 ft recorded at 300 ft offset with single seis- mometers. Since even the strongest reflections usually correspond to reflection coefficients of 0. 1 or less, under the assumption of energy loss through spherical spreading only, the same signal level should be observed at a distance of 10, 000 ft when the direct wave, rather than a reflected wave, is recorded. Scattering and absorption (especially of the higher frequencies) will reduce this range. The elimination of one of the two passages through the weathered layer when recording a mine-to-surface or surface-to-mine transmission should tend to increase the effective range. Use of seismometer array can greatly enhance the SNR if the arrays are properly sized and configured. By connecting all 19 seismometers in each subarray in parallel, the output is simply the sum of the 19 seismometer outputs. A uniform hexagonal array, such as the one recommended, has the property that its sum response is very low for plane waves whose (apparent) wavelength is equal to or less than the array diameter. Since most of the coherent noise recorded by the array will be propagating in the low-velocity weathered layer, it will exhibit relatively short (40 to 100 ft) wavelengths. The signals from within the mine will propagate almost horizontally (except, of course, when a subarray is almost directly overhead) at the pre- vailing subweathering rock velocity. Thus signals will exhibit apparent wave lengths of 300 to 700 ft. A 19-element array can give roughly an 18-db SNR improvement through simple summation when the noise is isotropic and propagating at apparent wavelengths equal to the array diameter.

- 35 - Any spatially random noise will increase in RMS by a factor of VN"! Thus, a 19-element array will give about a 13-db SNR improvement if the noise is spatially random. Most seismic noise in the signal band (25 to 50 Hz) is expected to appear spatially random even over the very small dimensions of the subarrays. However, strong coherent noise may appear, which results from coupling of acoustic waves in the air with the earth. The recommended subarray size is designed to attenuate such coherent noise energy. With the extrapolation from hammer-reflection seismic experi- ments and the improvements in SNR available through use of seismo- meter arrays, it appears that detection ranges of 5, 000 ft or more can be expected. This range will depend on the ambient seismic noise level and the types and conditions of the intervening rocks and soils. Measurements of seismic velocities and characterization of the ambient noise field in the 25- to 50-Hz band at each mining region prior to emergency use of the system is recommended. Optimum subarray size could be determined, signal velocity more accurately measured, and detection range determined. Then in an emergency, better SNR and better location precision could be obtained. The single seismometer used in the subsurface system will be the same type as that used in the surface system. It is expected that ambient noise levels in the signal band will be much less in the mine and use of arrays unnecessary. Range for surface-to-mine signal transmission will never exceed the mine depth--usually 400 to 600 ft. Good transmission can probably be achieved to much greater depths. There are three considerations when estimating the cost of this system. First is the cost of acquiring the instruments. Second is the cost of installing the system including training of mine personnel and operators. Surveying and measurements of seismic velocities are also installation expenses. The third system cost is the annual cost for inspection and maintenance.

- 36 - System Deployment and Ownership Surface System It is anticipated that the surface system be owned by the Bureau of Mines. It is important that the system can be quickly transported to the site of a mine accident. But because of the system cost, as few systems should be constructed as needed to give a quick reaction capability. Systems might be located in areas of high-density mining activity so that no mine is more than 50 miles from a system. All installation, training, inspection, and maintenance might be performed by a section of the Bureau of Mines specially set up for that purpose. All trained system operators and instructors for miners' classes could be Bureau of Mines personnel where feasible--mine safety engineers where not. Subsurface System The number of subsurface devices required for adequate protection will depend on the size of the mine, the number and distribution of underground crews, and the number and distribution of shafts and refuge chambers. The Bureau of Mines should set the requirements for the number, distribution, and type of subsur- face devices.

- 37 - REFERENCES Gough, D. I. , "A New Instrument for Seismic Exploration at Very Short Ranges, " Geophysics, Vol. 17, No. 2, April 1952. Meidao, Tsvi, "Hammer Reflection Seismics in Engineering Geophysics, " Geophysics, Vol. 34, No. 3, June 1969. Graebner, R. J. , "Seismic Data Enhancement - A Case History, " Geophysics, Vol. 25, No. 1, February l960.

APPENDIX C MINE RESCUE DRILLING SUBSYSTEM The purpose of this subsystem study is to design a drilling system for rescuing trapped coal miners in conditions most likely to be found in the United States. The same system can be used to rescue men trapped in other underground workings. In the past six years, men have been trapped in salt mines, potash mines, and tunnels. Although coal mines probably have the highest safety standards of all underground workings, the hazards are greater because most coal seams produce explosive methane gas; coal dust suspended in air is explosive; the coal will burn; coal naturally occurs in fairly weak sedimentary formations in which roof falls are common; and more tons of coal are produced than any other mineral. Thus more men are employed in producing coal, creating a greater exposure to accidents than other underground work. The rescue drilling system should be designed for the charac- teristics of the greatest volume of coal, recognizing that conditions may occur that fall outside the system capability. A study probably would show that 90 percent of the United States coal production comes from areas having the following characteristics: 1. Rather flat-lying bituminous coal seams less than 1, 500 ft below the surface. 2. Overlain with moderately low-strength rock in a multitude of relatively thin layers (a few inches to a few tens of feet) of varying strength. (The highest strength rock will be quartzite of approximately 25, 000-psi compressive strength, which in a very few areas may be as thick as 60 ft. ) 3. Overlying formations that will produce a relatively low volume of water (less than 100 gal/min). - 38 -

- 39 - 4. Mountainous areas making access to some drilling sites difficult. 5. Served by secondary highways where limited bridge capacity or underpass clearance may restrict movement of massive machinery. 6. Where rescue volunteers, mechanically skilled and unskilled, are abundant in time of emergency. The skills currently do not include large-hole drilling ability. • 7. Where cuttings disposal from drill rigs is not problem. 8. Where massive earth-moving machinery is likely to be available from surface mining operations. 9. Unconsolidated surface material (which will require surface casing) of less than 40-ft thickness. Mines in these areas will have the following characteristics: 1. Be within 100 miles (two-hours driving time) from commercial airports. 2. Be well surveyed and mapped and staffed by skilled engineers who can, in a reasonably short time, locate a surface site directly above any point underground. 3. Employ miners that are trained, if escape seems impossible, to enter refuge chambers if provided or to seek refuge in a deadend entry, barricade themselves, and wait for rescue. RESCUE DRILLING SYSTEM Given the above conditions, the mine rescue drilling system should:

- 40 - 1. Provide a highly mobile probe and search drill that would: a. Drill a 6- to 8-in. hole (probably 63/4 in. to take advantage of commercial technology in this size range) to 1, 500-ft depths with a capability of being extended to 2, 500-ft depths. b. Be transported in military aircraft. c. Drill reasonably straight holes with no more than 6-in. deviation per 100 ft depth. d. Drill 12, 000-psi rock at the rate of 100 ft per hour (or more) and strong quartzite at 20 ft per hour. e. Have maximum traveling dimensions of 8-ft width and 10-ft height. f. Have a hoist with a capacity of 2, 500 ft of 1/4-in. wire rope. (This can be a separate unit. ) g. Drill with air circulation. 2. Provide a rescue drill capable of: a. Drilling an 18- or 28-in. hole to 1, 500-ft depth with a desired capacity of being extended to 2, 500-ft depth. b. Drilling with air circulation. c. Setting casing for either hole size to a 500-ft depth. d. Drilling 12, 000-psi and weaker rock at the rate of 17 ft per hour and 25, 000-psi quart- zite at the rate of 6 ft per hour (penetration rates). e. Have hoist drum capacity of 2, 500 ft of 3/8-in. wire rope.

- 41 - RESCUE PROCEDURE The rescue drilling subsystem can be used independently of the total system and will improve the chances of rescue when drill- ing is required. Use of the total system, however, greatly increases the chances for survival and rescue. In a mine equipped with refuge chambers and seismic or electromagnetic location and communication beacons the exact location in which to drill can be easily determined. If the mine is equipped only with beacons, it will be possible to locate a drill within 50 ft of the survivors, in most cases close enough for rescue. As soon as it is recognized that the emergency situation will require the drilling apparatus, a report should be made to the Bureau of Mines in the normal manner. If the mine is equipped with location beacons, Bureau of Mines equipment will locate the survivors. If the mine does not have beacons, the mine management would be instructed to select the most likely areas where men may be trapped or barricaded. Survey crews would be dispatched immediately to locate a drill site on the surface. Since the drilling rigs described here are available and can be in use prior to the rest of the proposed system, the following discussion applies to mines without refuge chambers or location beacons. The simplification or elimination of the steps below if the other subsystems are in use is obvious. Bulldozers would clear a trail to the drilling site. In inclement weather, a supply of rock aggregate would be needed for the road. If the trapped men are in a refuge chamber, a rescue hole can be drilled immediately. Even when beacons are in use, but not chambers, it may be prudent to drill a probe hole to confirm that the workers can be rescue from this location. If neither beacons or refuge chambers are in use, trapped men must be located by probe holes. Meanwhile, if needed, the small exploratory drill rig would be sent to the site. If the men must be located by probe holes, a search would be conducted in an area of about 50-mile radius for other mine exploration drill rigs that would be requisitioned to

- 42 - supplement the Bureau's rig. These could be small diamond drills, truck-mounted rotary exploration or blasthole drill rigs, or (for mines less than 200 ft deep) down-the-hole percussion drills from nearby quarries, road jobs, or mines. Until most mines are equipped with location beacons, an inventory or census of drill rigs and how they are equipped could be maintained by divisional offices of the Bureau of Mines. It is assumed that the Bureau's rig could be on site drilling within three or four hours. Perhaps three or four holes requiring three to six hours each would be needed to make contact with miners. It is also assumed that in a well-planned operation miners may be contacted within 25 hours. Electric heaters, food, blankets, lights, telephones, medical supplies, and barricading materials would have been packaged to be inserted through a 6-in. hole. Instructions on survival and communi- cation would have been prepared. It should be noted that the discovery hole may have to be resealed except for a few hours each day to protect the men from dust created by the rescue drill. Pumps and high-pressure air ventilation lines may have to be lowered into the discovery hole to maintain a respirable atmosphere for men below. The discovered miners would be asked for information on mine conditions and locations where others may be found. Their advice would be sought for precise location of the bottom of the discovery hole and for suggestions on the relative position of the rescue hole to follow. The heavier rescue rig would have been dispatched to the drilling site. It may start drilling even before the exploratory hole has found men on the chance that a hundred feet or so of hole may be drilled in a location to which the men may be able to travel. In any event, there is no reason for the rig to stand idle. The drillers could be improving their techniques, and should a short move be necessary, it would require less than two hours. Such preliminary drilling would also give data on drillability, wall stability, and in-situ water conditions that may be helpful at another location.

- 43 - The large-hole rig would be equipped to drill either an 18- or 28-in. hole below the surface casing. By the time the men are located, it would have been decided whether they will be brought up in a harness or in a capsule. Harness recovery can be made through an 18-in. hole if indications are that: 1. The hole walls are stable. 2. The hole walls are fairly smooth and straight. 3. There is not a large volume of water flowing into the hole. 4. No men are injured requiring that they be strapped to a stretcher. The hole wall condition could be examined by a down-hole still camera taking pictures every 5 ft or by continuous inspection with a remotely controlled television camera. The large hole would be drilled in one pass. It the men are in a rather confined area, the last 10 ft of drilling must be done very slowly, particularly if the coal is overlain by a weak formation. This slower drilling rate, where required, would be at 2 ft per hour. Equipment for hoisting men out of the hole is also required. For the 18-in. hole, a harness system that holds a men upright if he loses consciousness, protects him from falling rocks, and maintains him in a position of minimum cross-sectional area (one arm above the head) is required. A coat of grease prior to beginning the ascent would also be helpful. A capsule should be designed for use in the 28-in. hole. It should be pointed at each end to prevent catching on rock shelves or "dog-legs" in the hole. The capsule should be capable of completely enclosing an injured man strapped to a stretcher. Both the top and bottom of the capsule must be jettisonable so that the passenger can be raised or lowered independently if the capsule gets caught. Both the harness and the capsule should be equipped with a microphone and speaker for communication and a mask and fresh-air line in case the air in the hole is not respirable. For safety reasons the men would be pulled to the surface by hand.

- 44 - THE EXPLORATORY DRILL RIG The exploratory drill rig would be truck-mounted. It would be capable of applying 30, 000 lb pulldown and gravitational thrust, not including the weight of the drillstring in the hole, on the bit. This probably would require a ballast box because the rear end of truck rigs is not that heavy. It would be capable of 'Lifting another 10, 000 lb of drillstring weight. It would drill a 9-in. surface hole to about 75 ft maximum depth and set 7 5/8-in. casing to rock at that depth or as required. It would drill a 6 3/4-in. hole below the casing to coal or about 1, 500 ft maximum. It would have a 5-in. flush OD drillpipe approximately 30 ft long. Flats would be milled at the tool joints to accommodate breakout wrenches and provide a means to suspend the pipe during trips. The derrick should have a magazine to accommodate three pieces of pipe and the other can be stored on the ground or a horizontal rack. Help will be available to load pipe into and out of the derrick magazine as required. The rig should also be able to handle three 30-ft-long sections of 7-in. pipe to be used for the 9-in. surface hole. This will keep the air requirements to less than 1, 000 CFM for the surface hole for 3,000-fpm annulus velocity. All of the air can be at 40 to 50 psi. The only time higher air pressure may be desired is to blow water from the hole. In any event, even with the air pressure at 100 psi, this would have to be done in stages as the bit is lowered. Fifty horsepower should be provided for the rotary drive. It should have four forward rotary speeds of about 25, 50, 75, and 150 rpm and one reverse speed of about 30 rpm. There are approximately ten manufacturers of truck-mounted rotary drill rigs and many of them make rigs that would require very little modification to do the exploratory work. These include:

- 45 - 1. Winter Weiss Division of Smith Intl. (Porter Drill) 2. Schramm 3. Bucyrus Erie 4. Robbins 5. Ingersoll-Rand 6. Joy Manufacturing 7. Davy 8. Gardner-Denver (Mayhew) 9. Chicago Pneumatic (Reich Drill) Hole deviation will be difficult to avoid. An Eastman multishot survey tool can be run into the hole at completion to locate the bottom of the hole with reasonable accuracy. Most coal mines are laid out on a room and a pillar or a panel mining plan. The exploratory hole will be aimed at a mine entry about 20 ft wide between two coal pillars that may be 30 to 80 ft wide. If the entry is missed, it will probably be by not more than a few feet. The miss will be known immediately on the surface because the depth to the coal will be known. If the drillstring does not fall into the cavity or if coal comes out with the air circulation, obviously the drill has deviated into (or has been directed into) the pillar. If there are miners in the entry, they will hear the drill. The depth into the pillar (or distance from the entry) will be so slight that unless the miners are injured they may dig their way into it. If the drill penetrates a coal pillar, it may be possible to with- draw the bit and use a whipstock to bend the drillstem into the entry. All of these drilling and survey tools should be maintained by the Bureau of Mines and used periodically. This will keep the tools in shape and train the crew.

- 46 - THE RESCUE DRILL RIG The rescue drilling rig must be able to handle large-diameter bits through the rig floor. The drillpipe would be 8-in. diameter either with oil-field-type threaded connection or with flanges. Pipe will be in 15- to 20-ft lengths. The swivel should have an opening of sufficient size to pass 4-in. cuttings. Reverse air circulation would be used. A 10- to 15-ft-deep cellar would be dug by hand. A 36-in. casing set and grouted in this cellar. A rotating seal must be developed, which would be attached to the top of this cellar casing. The lid must be removable for trips. The rotating center part must be designed to pass the pipe and tool joints or flanges as they pass into the hole. Air would be introduced into the annulus through the stationary part of the lid. An air flow of 2, 000 CFM would provide more than 5, 000-fpm velocity up through the drillpipe, which would be adequate. At this volume, the flow across the bottom of the 28-in. hole may not be as high as would be desired. However, the velocity through the pipe must not be too high or it would cause erosion or damage to the swivel. Three 1, 500-CFM, 100-psi air compressors at $60, 000 each would provide a flow rate of up to 4, 000 to 5, 000 CFM. The 100-psi air pressure is higher than would be needed for drilling but could be useful in removing up to 200 ft of water head that could build up while drilling is shut down. Planning of the drilling must not overlook the fact that all surface equipment must be stopped when the life support (6-in. ) hole is open for supplying the men below and talking to them. The noise and dust of drilling would interfere with these operations and cause a hazard to them. The rescue rig would have speeds of approximately 3, 8, and 15 rpm forward and 5 rpm reverse. The hoist on the rescue rig should be capable of lifting 10,000 lb.

- 47 - Baskets with a 16-in. outside diameter to surround the lower section of the drillstring should be provided as drill collars. These would be 10 ft long and be filled with lead shot for a weight per collar of about 15,000 lb. Four collars would be required. The additional drilling thrust would be provided by weight of the bit, drillstring, and swivel and by rig pulldown. All rigs, for probe and rescue, should have roller stabilizers for each bit size.

1 1 ! 1 I

4 1 TN23 .M56 1969 c.l Mine rescue and survival interim report /

Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report Get This Book
×
 Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Mine Rescue and Survival: Interim Report describes a mine rescue and survival system that could be developed from existing technology in about one year. The system could potentially save all coal miners who have died of carbon monoxide poisoning following explosions or fires. The proposed system consists of a survival subsystem using improved emergency breathing devices and refuge chambers, a communications subsystem using seismic or electromagnetic devices to locate and communicate with survivors, and a rescue subsystem of large- and small-hole drilling equipment and rescue teams.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!