Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
63 Appendix D Review of the Document This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Councilâs (NRCâs) Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that assist the authors and NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The contents of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. The following individuals participated in the review of this report: R. Stephen Berry, University of Chicago; Judith Corley-Lay, North Carolina Department of Transportation; Norman Dofflemyer, Maryland Department of State Police; Gongkang Fu, Illinois Institute of Technology; Lidia Kostyniuk, University of Michigan; Gerard McCullough, University of Minnesota; Bernard Robertson, BIR1, LLC; and C. Michael Walton, University of Texas at Austin. Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the committeeâs conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by National Academy of Sciences member Susan Hanson, Clark University (emerita), and National Academy of Engineering member Maxine Savitz, Honeywell, Inc. (retired). Appointed by NRC, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of the report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.
