Practices for Permitting Superheavy Load Movements on Highway Pavements (2015)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

30 REFERENCES 1. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act; Sec- tion 32801: Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Lim- its Study, U.S. Congress Legislation (MAP-21 §32801) [Online]. Available: http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Freight/sw/ index.htm [accessed May 30, 2014]. 2. Oversize/Overweight Permit Manual: United States & Canada, Specialized Carriers & Rigging Association, Centreville, Va., www.scranet.org, 2012 [Online]. Avail- able: http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/pdm/ super_heavy_load_analysis_background.htm#i1000221 [accessed June 7, 2014]. 3. Bilal, M.K., M. Irfan, A. Anwaar, S. Labi, and K.C. Sinha, A Synthesis of Overweight Truck Permitting, FHWA/IN/ JTRP-2010/12, Division of Research, Indiana Depart- ment of Transportation, West Lafayette, 2010. 4. Fu, G. and C. Fu, NCHRP Synthesis 359: Bridge Rating Practices and Policies for Overweight Vehicles, Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2006, 138 pp. 5. Pavement Design Guide, Texas DOT On-Line Manuals, Section 5: Super Heavy Load Analysis Background, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Jan. 1, 2011. 6. WASHTO Oversize-Overweight Limit Agreement [Online]. Available: http://txdmv.gov/oversize-weight- permits/multi-state-washto [accessed June 9, 2104]. 7. Subcommittee on Highway Transport (SCOHT), Meeting of the American Association of State Highways and Trans- portation Officials, Denver, Colo., Oct. 17–18, 2013. 8. AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition: A Manual of Practice, American Associa- tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Wash- ington D.C., 2008. 9. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study, Technical Steering Committee Report, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Dec. 1986. 10. Papagiannakis, A.T., R.C.G. Haas, J.H.F. Woodrooffe, and P. LeBlanc, “Effects of Dynamic Load on Flexible Pave- ments,” Transportation Research Record No. 1207, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 187–196. 11. Woodrooffe, J.H.F., D. Middleton, R. James, and J. Billings, NCHRP Report 671: Review of Canadian Experience with the Regulation of Large Commercial Motor Vehicles, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. 12. Impacts of Canada’s Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Research and Interprovincial Agreement, IBI Group and ADI Ltd., Canadian Trucking Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Oct. 1994. 13. Heavy Vehicle (Mass, Dimension, and Loading) National Regulation Subordinate Legislation 2013 No. 77, under the Heavy Vehicle National Law as applied by the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 and by the law of the Australian States and Territories, 2012. 14. European Commission Mobility and Transport website, Brussels, Belgium [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa. eu/transport/modes/road/weights-and-dimensions_ en.htm [accessed June 9, 2014]. 15. Dimensional and Mass Limitations and Other Require- ments for Abnormal Load Vehicles, 8th ed., Department of Transport, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, 2009. 16. Administrative Guidelines for Granting of Exemption Permits for the Conveyance of Abnormal Loads, 1st ed., Department of Transport, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, 2009. 17. Roux, M.P. and M.J. Kemp, Project DOT/11/2007/INM: Revision of TRH 11, Report CSIR/BE/ISO/ER/2008/ 0402/B, Counsel for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa, 2008. 18. Oregon DOT Superheavy Vehicle Road User Assess- ment Fees, Salem, Oct. 1, 2010. 19. Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study (HCAS) Final Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1997. 20. Balducci, P. and J. Stowers, NCHRP Synthesis 378: State Highway Cost Allocation Studies, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 65 pp. 21. AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures, American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Washington, D.C., 1993. 22. Documentation for Using the State HCAS Tool (NAPCOM), Office of Transportation Policy Studies, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., May 2000. 23. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May 2000. 24. Chen, X., J.R. Lambert, C. Tsai, and Z. Zhang, “Evalu- ation of Superheavy Load Movement on Flexible Pave- ment International,” Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2013, pp. 440–448. 25. Oh, J.H. and A.J. Whimsatt, Seal Coat Damage Evaluation Due to Superheavy Load Moves Based on Mechanistic- Empirical Approach, Texas Transportation Institute Report 0-5270-1, TTI, College Station, 2010. 26. Hajj, E.Y., Analysis Procedures for Evaluating Super- heavy Load Movement on Flexible Pavements, FHWA Report DTFH61-12-R00055, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C., n.d.

31 27. Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Asphalt Institute Manual Series-1 (MS-1), Asphalt Pavement Association, College Park, Md., 1981. 28. Thickness Design for Concrete Highways and Street Pavements, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill., 1995. 29. “Flexible Pavement Design System (FPS) 19w,” Texas Department of Transportation, Austin [Online]. Avail- able: http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/pdm/ fps19w_design_parameters.htm [accessed Aug. 12, 2014]. 30. Everseries Pavement Analysis Programs, Washington Department of Transportation, Olympia, 1999.